So, is there actually a point to WWE NXT? - 2010-10-12 9:01 PM
The supposed concept for NXT is that the winner gets a WWE contract (although obviously we know they wouldnt be wrestling on NXT or FCW if they werent contracted).
So far we have had two winners:
Season one - Wade Barrett
Season two - Kaval
So by the rules of NXT they should be the only NXT guys to have 'WWE contracts' yet every single person from season one is on the RAW roster.
Not only that, but Alex Riley from season two is a regular on RAW as The Miz signed him as his personal butt monkey, or whatever the position is.
Now though, two more season two guys are teasing joining The Nexus on RAW (Husky Harris & Michael McGuilicutty ... or however its spelled)
So the question now is, how many more will show up from season two, and how many of the women from season 3 will end up with contracts?
Its quite laughable really, but we have seen it before with the losers of Tough enough and the diva searches being signed, and usually outlasting the actual winners.
I just dont even understand why people bother voting anymore.
So far we have had two winners:
Season one - Wade Barrett
Season two - Kaval
So by the rules of NXT they should be the only NXT guys to have 'WWE contracts' yet every single person from season one is on the RAW roster.
Not only that, but Alex Riley from season two is a regular on RAW as The Miz signed him as his personal butt monkey, or whatever the position is.
Now though, two more season two guys are teasing joining The Nexus on RAW (Husky Harris & Michael McGuilicutty ... or however its spelled)
So the question now is, how many more will show up from season two, and how many of the women from season 3 will end up with contracts?
Its quite laughable really, but we have seen it before with the losers of Tough enough and the diva searches being signed, and usually outlasting the actual winners.
I just dont even understand why people bother voting anymore.