RKMBs
http://www.latimes.com/health/la-me-0118-porn-condoms-20120118,0,5973988.story
 Quote:
Weinstein said gay porn performers have been using condoms for years.

he must be an expert on gay porn.
It's in the same nanny-state category as telling people where they can smoke, or wanting to "sin-tax" cigarettes or soft-drinks or hamburgers.

At least in this case a "sin-tax" would be for an actual sin.

I wonder if this law can possibly last. If so, they'll just succeed in driving the porn industry (and the California tax revenue they pay) to Nevada or some other state.
Do they have to leave the state? They could just film in San Fran or someplace close by.
Well, in the article, they're targeting the San Francisco area next, for enacting similar laws.

Nevada, the home of bunny ranches and legalized prostitution, seems like a good match for the porn industry, if it leaves California.
Wait, are we talking about porn made in L.A. or condoms? Because I don't see a downside to a "buy American" philosophy for both.
Who cares if they use condoms. It's not like I watch porn to look at dicks. As long as I can see pussies being pounded, it's gonna be worth it.
© RKMBs