http://www.8newsnow.com/story/14460188/c...president-obama

Don't you just love weasel words?

Apparently JLA does.

Apparently Pariah didn't click on either link.

Read more and post less, Corky.

HOW CAN YOU ARGUE ABOUT POLITICS WHEN NIC CAGE HAS BEEN ARRESTED?!

What? Who would dare arrest Nic?!

He rides ghosts for a living!

Arguably, it has nothing to do with racism andveverything to do with making fun of a political opponent for being an idiot. After all, liberals referred to President Bush as a chimp on a regular basis.

For example, we have this from the Huffington Post:

• Prior to reading this new study I was under the mistaken impression that Bush was a parrot, because of his apparent inability to say anything about Iraq except 'progress is being made', which he repeats mechanically every time the topic is raised. But now the scales have fallen from my eyes: Bush is a chimp. It seems so obvious now, watching him speak.

Were all those references racist?

Assuming that, yes, "chimp" = "racist", now google the terms "Bush chimp" and then "Obama chimp" in image search. You get approximately 77,000 more images of the former than the latter. That an approximate 38% difference.

Most likely, in each case, the posters of same were doing so in an attempt to insult a political foe.

And, if we follow your argument that depicting a president as a chimp is racist, then it would seem that there are at least 38% more racists on the left than the right. That's a pretty big difference.

Oh please, Gordon. It's a very well known and understood social 'no-no' to compare black people with monkeys. It's not like they used images of fat, lazy cats, sleeping hippos, or Dodo's looking clueless. They used monkeys specifically because he's black. And they did it to his parents. Don't know about Obama, but I'd punch this bitch in the mouth just based on playground rules. No one on the Right should waste their time trying to defend what is, so obviously, a bad apple in the Republican organization.

But, I assume your (and Wondy's, and Pariah's, and BSAMS's and Rex's and all the rest of the SuperRightwing Friends) mind is already made up based on insta-political bias. Just thought I'd throw some reality in here for e moment before Dave comes running in with fifty mentions of the words "Liberal Media"...

A brillion points.

Obama's mother is white. His mother's whole side of the family is white. Remember Obama going on about how his white grandmother was a racist (even though she helped raise him)?

So calling a white woman a monkey is racist but calling a white man isn't?

Look, I agree with you that her joke was rude, stupid and disrespectful to the office of the president. And maybe her intent was racist. Even if not, she should fucking know better.

But if we're going to start throwing around the race card (again) let's at least be willing to analyze the whole thing and consider the context of recent history too.

Or are we going to engage in another game of "it's okay when our side does it but not theirs"?

I don't remember anyone sending pics of Bush around with swastikas on his forehead (although, I'm certain some Leftwing nutjobwhomod did). It would be wrong either way. So, again, don't waste time defending what is obvious racism coming from the extremist Right. This is exactly what we bash Muslims about. If there is a less-than-extreme side to your group, then make that the loudest voice. Otherwise, it looks like you're just defending the lunatics, which just paints your entire race or group as wrong. Don't be afraid to slam some nutjob like this woman, or Wondy, just because they have an 'R' by their name...

I'm not sure I care enough either way. racist emails? so fucking what? are we that thin-skinned as a society? now, ethnic slurs in the middle of a national news broadcast, yeah that'd be a problem. but ultimately free speech is free speech, however racist or fucktarded it might be. seriously, unless some high-level state or federal politician is responsible for this it's a nonissue. there will always be racists and bigots and fucktards around you. either call them out on it yourself or learn to fucking deal with it.

Exactly. Each party should take responsibility for its more extreme elements, rather than trying to cover them in a blanket of complicity..

That's way too much work to defend this chick. If she isn't racist, she's the stupidest bitch to walk the face of the earth if she thought this exact thing wouldn't happen to her after sending out those emails. Either way, she has no place in politics as she's displayed her inability to think before she acts.

How come it's not racist to endlessly --for years--call Bush a chimp, but it's racist to (one time)jokingly show "an Obama family portrait depicting [Obama's] parents as chimpanzees"?
(I see now reading the rest of the topic that G-man and the Doctor have both commented on this as well.)


It's not a portrayal I, or an overwhelming majority of Republicans would make of Obama. There are so many legitimate issues on which to attack Obama.
About his marxist past, about his marxist/terrorist associates (David, Ayers, Wright, Khalidi, Wright...), marxists in his administration (Van Jones, Dunn, Lloyd, Sunstein, Jarett..), and just the failures of his presidency, ignoring the priorities of those who voted for him in pursuit of a radical-leftist agenda(the various stimulus, omnibus bills, banning offshore drilling that further cuts jobs and makes us dependent on foreign oil, weak foreign policy in Libya, Egypt, Iran and elsewhere, policies that have created enormous pending inflation).

Davenport is a moron for giving this kind of free "Republicans are racist" ammunition to the Democrats, and should justly be fired or resign.

Yeah, but in all seriousness, the GOP leaders did call her out:

• County GOP Chairman Scott Baugh has called for the resignation of Marilyn Davenport, an elected member of the party central committee who sent the email to some committee members and others last week. Baugh said he received it Friday afternoon and quickly responded with an email telling Davenport it was "dripping with racism and is in very poor taste." He said the issue should be referred to the Orange County GOP's ethics committee.

So why is this being used as some sort of evidence that anyone but her and her handful of supporters feel this way? If one is going to argue (as JLA seemingly tried to) that this is endemic to the participant's party then, racist or just assholery, he or she needs to explain why similar crap on the other side (including some of the stuff hurled at Condi Rice) isn't evidence of an endemic problem on the other side.

You forget quickly.

Your personal idol, Whomod, used to post that kind of crap all the time. There was one in particular I recall from the "It's not about oil or Iraq.." topic, that showed Bush standing with Lieberman and several other moderate Democrats who voted with Bush on a few issues, and it showed them all standing in suits with swastika armbands, with a word balloon saying something like "You guys are Democrats, but if you play along we'll let you stay a while."

You say "it's wrong either way", but you always find a way to overlook it or excuse it, when it comes from the liberal/democrat side.

And simultaneously, you ignore that no one, ABSOLUTELY NO ONE, among Republicans here or elsewhere endorses the monkey-parents-family-photo e-mail this one lady sent. And yet you still label it "right-wing extremists" (I guess you got Chuck Schumer's memo).

This is not right-wing extremist, it is just plain stupid. And the woman who sent it should be fired immediately for her lack of judgement.

For all your crap, that is very well established.



I don't know if you delude yourself to believe you're objective, or whether you maliciously slander your opposition out of purely infantile defiance.

But the result is pitiably the same: you slander truth, you support lies, and you enable evil with what you choose to support against all evidence.

...wow...

To be fair to Pro:

• I don't think he's ever claimed to be objective any more than any of the rest of do.
  
  I read his post to specifically say he had little doubt that whomod had done such a thing.
  
  
   Quote:

  I don't remember anyone sending pics of Bush around with swastikas on his forehead (although, I'm certain some Leftwing nutjobwhomod did)
  (emphasis added)

Uh...

He also said...



So despite that no one, ABSOLUTELY NO ONE on the Right defended this lady, all republicans are slandered by him as supporting her unless we say otherwise, which we all DID already say we condemn despite the ' "R" next to [her] name'.

So, as in the Rep Giffords shooting four months ago, we're [Republicans] all guilty till proven innocent. And then even when we clearly never supported or believed what this lady did, we're [Republicans] all racist "extremists", and he's still waiting for some of us to condemn it, despite that we ALL already did.

So, despite a few phrases of pseudo-moderation in Pro's quoted remarks, he's a partisan weasel, just like always.

And don't forget that despite Prometheus' quoted comments above about Whomod's extremism, BSAMS quoted a topic a while back from the Iconoclat forum where Pro was on his knees worshipping every word Whomod writes.

So Pro's a lying cocksucker piece of shit, talking out both sides of his mouth. And is more liberal-extreme than the "right wing extreme" rhetoric he manufactures out of thin air.

Or as I put it in my signature:

Again, to be fair, one of the sources said one or two people on the county committee who are friends of hers did defend her.

Granted, they did so under a theory of "she's a nice old lady who didn't mean it that way." Which is not the same as defending racism. However it is an attempt at a defense.

Again, that in no way tars the entire party, especially given that the leadership called for her resignation. But someone did defend her.

So you can't really say that "absolutely no one" defended her.

Why can't we all just set aside partisanship and politics and just make fun of the woman for being an idiot?

Jesus, guys. It's like you're not RKMBers anymore.

We used to be a family!

If only Pro could be as objective as WB and G-man.


I'll agree with the "it's wrong whoever does it".

Who the fuck pissed into your corn flakes this morning?

As for the story, one might be able to defend her if it wasn't for her history of defending others. The chimp thing, standing by itself, I wouldn't see as racist as there were many Bush chimp pictures. It is a political meme. But, you throw in the White House watermelon patch & such and it does look terribly racist. It could only get worse if they had him eating fried chicken while cashing a welfare check. Bitch needed to be removed and, from here on out, ignored.

What proof have you that there was any specific intent towards racism?

As has already been pointed out, someone being compared to a chimp (see also: Bush) can just as easily attribute to a lack of intelligence and/or charisma.

Would you say it's a racist statement that Obama resembles a chimp moreso than Bush even though it's a true statement?

If she had said something along the lines of "Obama is a filthy monkey--and here's proof," then I'd be more than making fun of her. I'd be calling her a racist.

But quite frankly, I don't see much difference between this and the attacks lodged against Bush.

I will say though that she was stupidly short-sighted. She should have known that oversensitive tards would make a big deal out of it.

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wow. I snapped you like a dry twig. How easy. Get your act together, David. You're starting to remind me of Tommy and his Yellow Liberal Ass-Bug...

I guess Prometheus concedes that there is no apparent racist intent on Davenport's part.

I'm sorry. Since when do you and I speak directly to each other? Why on earth should I bother dancing with you? The facts speak for themselves, and any illusion of objectivity from your part is merely an attempt to deflect from my point. And kid, if you didn't get it the first time, I'm not bothering to explain to you now. Pariah talking to me. Give me a break...

Is this the point where I post a series of laughing graemlins to make myself feel better about my position even though it doesn't really serve my side of the argument in any way shape or form?

Yes?

As much as I hate political correctness, it's ingrained into our society to the point that I couldn't see how someone could write or even read a statement like such in regards to Obama and not have even a moment of thought of, "Hey! That sounds a little racist." At least not without being a little racist themselves, which, then, they wouldn't fucking care. Again, either way, the chick is stupid. Anyone trying to defend her is being equally stupid or blindly partisan to the point that you have to defend anyone with your same, overall, political beliefs even if you think she was wrong/stupid for what she did.

AGAIN: Who's defending her?

Absolutely no one. Why do you act like anyone is?

While I appreciate the distinction you try to make, I still disagree.

No one defended what she did. They just said she did something indefensible but she's still a nice lady, so give her a break. They defended her overall character, not her actions.

Just making sure since, you know, it's your favorite thing to do when you decide to run away from an argument without conceding a point you can't back up.



I never defended her emails. I only pointed out that there's not enough evidence of racism despite Promethues' willingness to label as many people apart of the tea party as he can as some kind of discriminatory backward redneck.

Pariah, you seem to be under an illusion of debate with me, here. Re-read the thread. You have made no points. You have proven nothing. In fact, every element disproves pretty much anything you have tried to offer in discussion. And yet, you still insist on posting at me as if you and I have some unfinished business. We don't. I made my point, crystal-clear. Again, if you have reading or comprehension issues, take it up with a doctor or Army medic or drug-smuggler with a heart-of-gold. Personally, I don't care. Meanwhile, you are wasting your time trying to prod me off my point. It stands. My conviction is sincere. So, you might as well just withdraw back to your insignificant little corner of the internet you lurk when not boring us with your cries for attention. Thanks man.

If you bothered to notice, G-man and I are not in agreement here.

Leave me the fuck out of your lovers' quarrel.

Your "conviction" is non-existent.

You slander all Republicans, when it's just one odd lady, who every Republican condemns. You have no conviction or facts, only blanket smear of all Republicans.

You've presented no facts, only empty

EVERY Republican, on these boards and elsewhere, has condemned what this lady posted, as perhaps not racist, but certainly poorly thought out and stupid.

Only you, and lying cocksuckers like you, try to slanderously assert that a few/some/most Republicans agree with or defend what she did.
The facts are she is universally condemned for posting what she did. So you lie, to insinuate otherwise.

If exposing your clear hypocrisy can be interpreted as "snapping" me.
I think this is your attempt to save face after being humiliatingly exposed.

You did praise Whomod as the greatest most wonderful bestest EVER poster on RKMB, behind our backs on the Insurgency boards. And to our faces, you say he's a nutjob.
Far from objective, you're a complete liberal-indoctrinated partisan zombie for the Left. And you accuse me and others of being "right wing extremist"? Oh kettle, thou art black.

The closest thing you have to an intelligent and logical response is .

I skinned you and hung your hide out to dry, and you didn't even get it.

Yeah, they acknowledged her behavior is indefensible, but tried to let her save the slightest bit of face by saying she's not a bad person despite her clear bad judgement on this incident.

So?

whomod and pro are buddies topic






Here's Pro, condemning Whomod's left-wing craziness here, and praising it elsewhere for being great posts and "a legend" on RKMB.

i.e., he has a double standard. He condemns "right wing craziness" (which isn't even right wing, just one crazy lady who is roundly condemned by the right) while he praises left-wing craziness of the Whomod variety as "the best" on RKMB.

Hypocrisy anyone?

Apparently you didn't or you'd show some proof of your assertions instead hiding behind lengthy responses of why you choose not to respond to me. The irony can be cut with a knife.

Awesome! Keep going. I'm on a roll here.



Except that everyone other than you and Dave, the Tea Partyer inherently understands the common sense and rational logic concerning the subject. Thus, if you can't grasp the basics of why it's inherently racist, then I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince you. You either comprehend it, or you don't...

Except there's nothing "inherent" about it. Comparing someone to a chimp need not refer to race--as the people who've compared Bush to an ape will tell you.

This was mentioned even before I entered the thread. But despite the fact that I'm not the only one who brought it up, you still ignored it.

Yeah, I think most people are generally looking at this from a pretty moderate position. The chimp thing alone, unless you are a full on left-wing loony, doesn't necessarily come off as racist. As plenty of us have said, it is a political meme used by both sides to present their opposition as a doofus or lacking in character/ability. That said, this email doesn't reside in a vacuum. Her defense of other people's emails depicting such things as the White House watermelon patch lends credence to the speculation of racist motive. As such, it isn't so much her intent (which may not have been racist at all) as it is the reception of the email.

Personally, while I do defend the right of people to portray another as a chimp regardless of race when speaking to their lack of character or ability, I don't think that was necessarily the case with this woman. But, I think we can generally all agree that this woman is either stupid, racist, or both.

As for defenders, I'm sure they are out there and are probably right-wing nutters who spread emails about the White House watermelon patch and tell jokes about Obama health initiatives being a way for them to have more fried chicken for themselves. I deal with these people. I know they are out there. But, on the flip side, I don't think it is right to use them as the poster boys of this movement any more or less than using a bunch of left wing nutters as the poster boys for the left.

Reality: there are nutters. Reality: they are few and on both sides. Reality: the media really likes to try and blow smoke up our asses about their prevalence and use them to fearmonger in order to discredit that which they do not agree with.

Oh...And, calm the fuck down Wondy.

Wondy, don't take this personally because I think you can an okay guy, but you're sounding like you have a Beck-sized space bug up your arse.

She's stupcist!

she's a bothan.

many of her kind died to bring you this information.

You haven't proven that me or Pariah are different whatsoever from anyone else on these boards regarding this. Even Iggy says that the incident itself doesn't prove the woman is a racist. It's only in the context of other things she's said that he sees it pointing that way.


And by the way, where was all your self righteous liberal outrage when this was said...



Or this...



Ot this...




There are many MANY other examples of similar quotes from the Democrat ranks. Comments that cannot simply be interpreted as racist, but clearly and unquestionably are racist.

That you obviously have no problem with. Because you're a lying partisan hypocrite, who's only in it to slander your political opposition. Your mind is made up, so I won't continue to confuse you with facts that oppose that indoctinated viewpoint.

non sequitur.

yeah dude, you really need to dial it back like, six or seven notches. no offense, but it's getting pretty strident...

So to recap the liberal take, if Obama's idiocy is compared to an ape it's racist. If Bush's idiocy is compared to an ape it's not racist. I think this encapsulated the entire liberal stance. They can't compete on the playing field with ideas so they handicap their opponents by making anything about them off limits. Anyone that supports the double standard cannot be taken seriously.

I think WB's point about a double standard, under which liberals get to say horrible racist things about black republicans and the news is either buried or excused (both by the rest of the DNC and the media), is completely valid.

That being said, the validity of that point gets a bit lost in all the "lying partisan cocksucker hypocrate source of the evil in the world" stuff.

Dave, man, come on. You're going to have a stroke if you keep this up. It's Pro. He's a bald dude with liberal leanings who smokes too much pot. It's not David Warner in "Time Bandits" for Chrissakes.

No offense taken.
I know you see it that way, and maybe you envision me saying this with veins bulging on my forehead, but for the most part, I think I'm just calling this for what it is from Prometheus, with no embellishment necessary.

I'll go through the post you quoted:





I think I backed that up pretty well. Pro alleges that some/many/most Republicans share the racism of this lady or at least endorse it, or at least don't condemn it.

Which flies in the face of the facts. EVERYONE has condemned what she did, most have called for her firing or resignation. MYSELF INCLUDED! (See my first few posts here.)



Again, I backed this up, no hysteria on my part, just calling it for exactly what it is from Pro's end.



Again, no hysteria, every point I made has been backed up. Pro presents no facts, just



Again no hysteria on my part, just stating the facts.



Except for calling Pro a "lying cocksucker", which is a longstanding WonderBoy-ism signature line in heated political discussion, that I use on the most over-the-top liars.
Which Pro's partisanship certainly qualifies for, in the viciousness of what he alleges about "right wing extremists" all being racists, despite that they all condemned what this lady said in the harshest of terms, and called for her firing or resignation.

Myself included.

But despite Republicans universally condemning her actions in the harshest of terms, he clings to the "racist" label for all "right wing extremists" (a phrase that is parroted right from Chuck Schumer in its demagoguery of anyone he disagrees with as "extreme", and adding to that "racist".)

I actually think "lying cocksucker" is a restrained response to that blanket slander of conservatives on Pro's part, and on the part of a huge swath of those on the political left doing the same.

Perhaps you should just stick to your take?

Okay, point taken.

It's just ironic, because again, what I say is a relatively mild response, in proportion to him saying just because one Republican said this, that somehow implies some/most/all republicans are "racist extremists", despite that they all condemned her actions and called for her firing and resignation.

And needless to say, this is pretty much a weekly slanderfest on the part of the left, constantly raising the same racist/extremist allegations, against the evidence. In the Rep Giffords shooting, it was blamed on "right wing extremist" rhetoric, despite no evidence that he ever listened to any right wing commentators, and despite that friends, neigbors and school classmates described Jared Loughner as a "liberal pothead".

I could split hairs on what you said on many points (I said earlier that Pro's willingness to swallow and parrot liberal talking points whole and undigested enables evil, not that his opinion is the source of evil, just that he allows it to occur. Edmund Burke said something very similar, if you recall).

I'd tell Pro to shut up and take another bong hit, but I got yelled at for saying that a few months ago too.

Geez!

Shhh! You'll burst his bubble and I'm enjoying this faaar too much...

{eats popcorn and watches Dave spend another hour or so compiling quotes to try and support his crazy}

You can't be taken seriously, Pro.

Obama's idiocy wasn't brought up. It was his parents. Completely different things.



Correct.



No double-standard to worry over. Case dismissed.

And yet, you stridently respond to every one of my posts. Strange, huh?

Dave, please stop defending racist trash in your Tea Party. It demeans you.

stop fucking enabling evil, modmetheus! you slanderous bastard you!

I think you need another bong hit.

No one would care about Obama's parents to parody them, if not for Obama's idiocy.

I guess it's okay for Pro to fuck evil, as long as they don't have kids.

Does that make me racist against evil?

I have no sensitivity to these things.

<cricket>

but seriously though.

You go out of your way to admit a double standard before immediately denying it and you honestly believe that makes your position more valid than mine?

Wait...I thought we all did that?

And as usual...you guys are so fucking retarded for arguing this

what do you mean, 'you guys'?

What do YOU mean 'you guys'??

The aristocrats?

Just wait for the sequel!

Knut, when you say "you guys", are you talking about people whose skin color is different from yours?

...because that's racist, you know.

I know, and yes. Yes I am.

I am not right-wing, I hate both parties.

Fair enough, Rex.

BTW, who is your avatar?

buddy hackett.

Something many right wing tea partiers also say.

And rex often sounds like a Tea Partier when he posts.

And ironically, jumps on me for posting the exact same opinions of Obama and his socialist/authoritarian policies that Rex himself posts.

I sound like a tea partier to you because you have to put others into groups so you can judge them. Since you are weak you are trying to make it seem like we think alike when we don't.

Both of us agreeing that obama is a horrible commie bitch doesn't make us friends. The world is not black and white, people have differing opinions that don't fit the typical conservative/liberal ideals.

I am an individual. They is no need for me to attach themselves to others through political parties or quoting tv show talk hosts. When I have an opinion on something I state it. I don't warm over something someone said on TV or something written in a book. I have the ability to think for myself and confident enough in myself to not have to hide behind other peoples words or use them to prove a point I am unable to.

Yes, the truth and facts make weak people like you cry.

It's really odd to see Pro fall for this. He seems intelligent enough to not take the race bait, but for some reason does.

pro is more intelligent than that, but would you want to sound like you're agreeing with wondy?

To show you how much of a joke this is, here is video of liberlas yelling and cursing at a little girl speaking at a tea party rally:




This is real anger directed at a child, not a satirical photoshop. Yet there isn't much of an uproar. It shows you what a skewed reaction is when it's a right wing kid getting threatened vs a photoshopped picture of a lefty.

That was Pariah.

Why are you being such a prick to me here, Sammitch?
Who are you trying to impress?

Irony.

You're unemployed and live with your mom, Rex.
What an impressive model of strength and independence you are.

stop whining. I don't need to impress anyone. I'm trying to limit your ability (if not tendency) to give the rest of conservatism a bad name. seriously, when left and right on this forum can agree on something, and that something is you? tone. it. down.

Seriously, what the fuck?

It was already pointed out that his mom is white and he still falls for this shit.

Is this the weed talking or just his usual hatred of conservatives blinding his reason?

Awesome.

Apparently he's not. And you wouldn't have to stumble over yourself defending his retardation (e.g. confusing my quote for his) if you weren't so insecure about having an opinion similar to someone you dislike.

As such, you do seem to be making a noticeable attempt to impress a certain camp here by making concessions for a certain poster who happens to be more concerned with conversational finesse than facts.

The truth is humorous I suppose.

Distilling this thread down to the essence let's see what we can and can't agree on:

• 1. Obama is a shitty president and you don't need to be a racist to believe that.
  2. However,some people who don't like Obama are racists. Similarly, some people who do like Obama are racists.
  3. Racism is bad
  4. While racism is bad, we have become a nation of pussies that has a tendency to assume something is racist way too quickly.
  5. Showing the president as a chimp is not necessarily racism, especially when he has a white mother.
  6. However, when the person showing the president as a chimp has a history of racist comments and/or defending racist comments, that person probably had a racist motive in showing the president thusly.
  7. Even if not racist, a public official who thinks that forwarding an email like this isn't going to come back to haunt them is an idiot.
  8. Conservatives who say racist and hurtful things seem to get more attention from the mainstream media than liberals who do.
  9. Rob is, and always will be, gay.

Who agree's with number 8 that isn't a whiny conservative?

Somebody's ears burning?

This was the greatest lesson this thread could teach anyone..

So, arguing against the perception of racism in a given situation is the equivalent of defending any parties involved in the alleged act of racism...

You have a truly...innovative grasp of the topic at hand Prometheus.

Then why are you trying so hard?



Is that NOT supposed to piss me off?
You snipe from the sidelines and make no coherent point. I'd say THAT gives conservativism a bad name.



Why don't you tell Prometheus to TONE.IT.DOWN. He's the one making blanket statements about Republicans who already condemned this lady's e-mail as "right wing extremists" who are racist for not objecting enough to her actions, in his subjective point of view. Despite that everyone here --myself included-- said she should be fired or resign.

Seriously. What the fuck is your problem?

Wondy...no one likes you. We all think you're fucking retarded. The folks one the left. The folks on the right. Even the people like me who think politics are complete shit. You're one of the few things that both sides agree on. Don't you get that?

I tried explaining this before...I don't know why I'm trying again.

Must be kinda bored

By the way you guys should all go see Rango. Seriously that movie was extremely well done

http://www.dayofactionmovement.org/

I didn't see a photoshop?
-Pro

On april 23, you're not allowed to buy crack from white-skinned dealers.

Spelling counts, Knut.

It's just fashionable to ridicule certain posters, and you guys troll on me more often than others because I make the mistake of taking you seriously.
But when I see crap like this, I don't take it seriously.

Over and over, I've seen where I post a political opinion, or I post a sourced article, and no matter how well I back it up with sources, or how well I say it in my own words, no matter what I'll get heat for it, and someone else saying virtually the exact same thing isn't challenged or considered over the top.


Do I sometimes say some over-the-top stuff? Sure I do. Everyone here does. But somehow my comments are more fashionable among your little clique to rip on. Whatever.

While I do think Promod is an ass to sweepingly label anyone with an opinion he doesn't like "right wing extremist" because one odd lady posted a photoshop monkey cartoon, I didn't post that "lying cocksucker" phrase with too much intended seriousness. As I said before several posts back, it's a deliberate WonderBoyism I post knowing I'll take heat for, and don't really care what you think.

You've already proven you're as much a pure troll as Rex.
Have your fun, whatever, it's meaningless to me.

Guys, can I be part of a clique? I've always wanted to be in one.

Not really seeing where WB's opinion is much different than some of the others on this. Not counting Rex, why is WB getting treated differently?

Its not his opinion we're attacking, its his retardation.

You can't see that since you're just as bad as he is.

I don't know. Do you have what it takes to be in the Liberal Conspiracy Super Club? We in the LCSC have exacting standards. Have you ever:

• read socialist/communist literature like the Communist Manifesto or How the Grinch Stole Christmas?
• killed a puppy and/or kitten with your bare hands?
• tried to repress freedom and liberty with your communist ideals on an internet message board?
• sullied Dave the Wonder Boy's pure and virginal name with liberal lies and slander?

If you've answered yes to at least three of these or are just looking for attention, mail in your membership card and two proofs of purchase from Quaker's Rice Cakes to:

Liberal Conspiracy Super Club
PO Box 54632
New York, New York 10036

http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-19/polit...?_s=PM:POLITICS


Scott Baugh, chairman of the Republican Party of Orange County, said he was surprised by the e-mail.

"There's no question the e-mail is racist. The only question is what was in Marilyn's heart, what was her intent. But I don't think there's anybody on her committee or anybody in the world really that doesn't see it as a racist," Baugh said on CNN's "AC360."



I need to send this guy a link to this thread. Digby, Pariah, and G-shill will set him straight.

really? have you read anything I've ever posted outside this forum? to imply I'm 'trying' at anything here implies you haven't. at some point it needs to sink in that no one cares what you have to say when ninety percent of the time you come across as a raving asshat. not to mention how phenomenally easy it is to send you into an apoplectic rage - did you ever stop and realize that's why you're rex's favorite target? you're currently hovering around iconolast levels of ZOMG srs bsns!!1! and general butthurt over the state of your internet honor. it is, simply put, impossible to take you seriously. again, the apathy (at best) of other posters to your posts rarely has much to do with what you're saying and everything to do with how you're saying it.

and don't waste your time with a heartfelt plea via PM for me to stop being such a jerk. it just makes you look that much sadder. stop being a lolcow and you'll be a much lower-profile target.

Thanks for clarifying

Okay, great, I'm an "asshat" or whatever. I see a lot of insults hurled my way, and glad my posts provide so much entertainment for you guys.

But seriously, beyond a few phrases where I even laughed at myself in retrospect when you guys called me on it, please demonstrate to me where my response is really that different from that of G-man, BSAMS, or even Rex?
You're excluded from that Sammitch, because you rarely if ever post a lucid political opinion, and just treat this area like an extension of the RANDOM CHAT or OFF TOPIC forum.


Seriously Sammitch. I don't see any specifics in your little diatribe that extend beyond namecalling to define what you see as oh-so-objectionable in what I post.

obviously someone skipped over the no one cares portion of my post.

okay, so maybe that's a little harsh.

but seriously, to say I 'rarely if ever' post my opinions in this forum is a sad oversight - one that suggests, again, that you don't seem to read much of what a lot of us post in here unless it has some import to your posts or your personal opinion. not only have I presented my perspective on a number of issues, I've taken the liberty of actually presenting a calm and rational argument for a number of them. it's really an interesting approach - you should give it a go sometime.

at any rate, this forum isn't the reason I post on these boards. why am I on rob's boards? because it's fun. but see, you have this uncanny fun-eradicating ability that doesn't really win friends and influence people in any forum. you're incapable of lightening up and not taking disagreements personally. it gets old. fast.

I'm hard pressed to remember any time I was driven into an "apoplectic rage".

You seem to feel if I post any political opinion whatsoever, if I respond with any specifics or reasoned argument, that is somehow beyond the pale, apoplectic rage and unacceptable.
Well, too bad.

And again --even within this topic-- beyond one or two remarks that I was called on and laughed at in retrospect, my opinion is virtually the same as expressed by BSAMS, Rex, G-Man, Pariah, or probably even you, if you bothered to express a lucid opinion instead of just sniping at me personally.

You accused me of a bunch of crap, but offered no examples or specifics. Name some examples, or shut the fuck up.

what bit you on the ass, dave? a waaaampire? or a tearwolf?

I made a few jokes to lighten the mood a page or so ago, and you mocked me for that too, with [crickets].

So even when I do try to joke around and lighten the mood, you're still a jerk to me.

I recall in the first year or so you posted here, you had a greater tendency to discuss your opinion of issues in depth. I really havent seen that in a long time. And the ONLY time I ever PM'd you privately (5 or 6 years ago) was to comment on how inane and lacking in serious content your posts had become, wondering about the change.

I mostly post in the politics forum, and don't frequently visit the other forums.

I have fun on Rob's boards too, but mostly I post in the POLITICS section, which tends to be more serious. Since you and many others hang out more in RANDOM CHAT and OFF TOPIC, then yeah, my posts would tend to have a higher ratio of serious content. But you sweepingly label me as "uncannily fun-eradicating", despite that I do post a fair abount of humor in my posts.
There are times --particularly when put under a microscope, accused of all kinds of crazy shit, and put on the defensive, where I --excuuuuuuuuuuse ME!!-- don't tend to bring the funny.

Was that intended to make sense?

LMAO!!

I don't even know what "apopleptic" means!

I'll tell you when you're older.

I think you'll find a few distinctions here and there. For example:

• Pro's Opinion = It was a racist email, intended to be racist. And no matter how many times people shout "His mom's white", it does not in any way, shape, or form disengage the inherent racism in painting his parents (not him, personally, but a shot at his parents) as monkeys. President Obama is black. Comparing blacks to monkeys is an age-old racist axiom. None of this is in dispute, and anyone trying to make excuses for any of this is simply wasting time. There are bad apples in every organization, and if you don't have the conviction to call them out when they're wrong, then your entire organization deserves to be seen as extremists. Again, we harp on the Muslims about this very thing, so it's hypocritical for anyone on the Right or Left to partake in the same sin. Fact.
  
  G's Opinion = It's sort of racist, but not really. And the woman was an idiot for doing this.
  
  BSAMS' Opinion = It's not racist because his parents were white.
  
  Pariah's Opinion = There's no proof it's racist, and any obvious, rational, or logical thought applied to this cannot be considered without my approval. And I love Prometheus.
  
  WB's opinion = The email wasn't racist, the woman isn't racist, and no harm was done whatsoever to anyone EXCEPT the slander, lies, and evil from the Liberal Media Militia against the Saints of the Republican Round-Table. How dare ANYONE question anything The Right does, and even the slightest hint that the Tea Party and The Right aren't anything but fucking perfect is an outright lie, propagated by the devil himself, that cock-sucking, motherfucker Prometheus. WHITE RAGE!!!!!1!!!!!

That reminds me, Pro. Your new decoder ring should be arriving in the mail soon.

THE PLAN is almost ready. We will soon RULE those plebes, the REPUBLICAN ROUNDTABLE!

CODE 7-4.

Also, it's your week to bring drinks and napkins.

Dammit!

Oh dear! How on earth am I going to get Prometheus to start caring about being proved wrong in this thread! He's just so lacking in interest here that the situation seems hopeless.

Ideas anyone?

...clockwork...

Dance puppet, dance.

Roger.

Wow, you had nothing so you went backwards into the thread to try and....what? Repeat yourself? Just stop, man. Seriously. Your desperation to "save face" is really just painting you more foolish than I would have expected...

Worked like a charm.

...uh....what?

No worries Pro. I understand you don't care in the slightest, and that makes you forgetful. So I'll make sure to remind you of exactly why you don't care in the first place.

Yep. That's all you deserve. You're not even trying to be entertaining anymore. Now you just sound like Wonder Boy, desperate to be taken seriously. Somehow.

With all due respect, despite the harsh language, that's just a statement of fact about the way you parrot the liberal talking points whole and undigested.

I could have used gentler language, but that's just a statement of facts, Mr "right wing extremist" talking points.

For all your fronting of moderation, you parrot the extremist lies of the Reid/Pelosi radical left, demonizing the entire Republican party as "racist" because of one lady's e-mail that every Republican has condemned, including me, calling for her firing or resignation.

And by your mindlessly sponging up those Reid/Pelosi lies and talking points, and perpetuating them here, you do enable Obama and his merry band of Marxist revolutionaries who have stated --not implied-- their intention to destroy the U.S. free market system as we know it.

Cloward and Piven Strategy.
Saul Alinsky.
Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology.
Van Jones ("Give them the wealth", "top-down, bottom-up, and inside out")
Mark Lloyd.
Anita Dunn.
Cass Sunstein.
William Ayers.
Jeff Jones and the Apollo Alliance.



Obama's ideological connections to these people are documented way beyond any possible attempt to dismiss them as "right wing paranoia" or conspiracy theory. Their self incriminating words in audio and video clips, as well as their own writings, are all over conserative media and Youtube. And occasionally even the liberal media.

That's pretty reasoned and factual, but don't let that keep you from dismissing it as an apoplectic rant.

Wondy, you are a very sad and very retarded person. Please seek help.

Now there's an apoplectic post!

Where you're so intolerant and liberal-indoctrinated in your Republican = "right wing extremist" racist rationalization that it's impossible for you to even understand what we've said, so you feel a need to caricature (i.e. slander) our stated perspectives to rationalize your point of view.

My actual stated view is: the lady demonstrated bad judgement in posting the e-mail, but it's a liberal double-standard because this lady circulated the monkey photoshop "family photo" once, and yet Democrats see absolutely nothing wrong with portraying Bush as a "chimp" for eight years, and still counting.
Also Bill Clinton's overtly racist remarks about Obama (" few years ago, he would have been bringing us coffee!"), Harry Reid's overtly racist comments about Obama ("Light skinned, non-ethnic, won't be offensive to white mainstream voters because he doesn't speak ethnic black dialect english"), liberal demonstrators who hate Clarence Thomas and say they should "string him up" (lynch him), or put him back in the fields picking cotton.

These unmistakeable examples of liberal racism Prometheus gives a free pass to, and doesn't even acknowledge exist.

But one questionably racist cartoon that EVERY REPUBLICAN CONDEMNS, INCLUDING ME, Prometheus portrays us all --contrary to all facts-- as supporting, while also projecting an image of me in Klan robes.

(i.e., you're a fucking liar and deceitful piece of shit)

I love you.

Don't even change.

Pariah just made the point that you never made your case, you just gloated emptily Whomod style to mask it and change the subject, and never made the case, and just acted like you did, for 7 pages now.

Likewise, I also impaled you on a giant spike of your own hypocrisy, and you just pretend you're not gushing blood and entrails through that giant hole in your chest.

That is so hot.

I impaled Pro on a giant spike of his own hypocrisy, not on my penis.



Just clarifying.
If it still excites you, that's okay. I'm not judging.

Wondy, lets have the kind of sex shawn hannity is always yelling about.

that is so hot.

It was just a matter of time before their true feelings for each other surfaced. I guess this thread was worthwhile after all, if it finally brought these two crazy kids together. Congratulations. We've been rooting for you.

Sorry, Rex, I'm not available.

I'm still impaling Pro.

Who isn't?

If he said this to be funny it would have been perfect.

that is so hot.

Ewwwwwwwwww!

Stop crooning. It's unseemly.

Yes wondy, you're a babbling lunatic in that post. We all saw it the first time.

Please go back to describing how you want to impale Pro with your penis. I'm really kind of enjoying it.

Make sure to add something to describe the setting, I kind of picture it like in the cover of a romance novel, where you are shirtless and oily and holding Pro in your arms. While Pro is looking wistfully into your eyes, and seeing his future life with you.

All that he sees in the future are heartbreak and pain. In the meantime, you see nothing. Nothing at all. Not even Pro's hair. Cuz he's bald.

Perhaps my future is in erotic gay fiction, and not the POLITICS forum.

Its funny because I didn't have to edit that one.

!!

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!

BTW, I like how you keep trying to change the title of this thread, Dave. That's a classic case of denial on your part, man. Therapy. You'll thank me later.

Your obsession with something as small as how I title my posts makes me think otherwise.

That you're afraid of the truth despite all your , that you realize you're exposed, and you are thus trying to change the subject.

And just y'know, generally a weaselly sack of excrement.



I've repeatedly pointed out how --despite your self-congratulation of how neutral you are-- you keep hyping the "right wing extremist" partisan talking points of Reid, Pelosi and Schumer. I keep raising that point, you keep avoiding it.

Wondy, we call you a right wing extremist because you are a right wing extremist.

http://www.myfoxny.com/dpps/news/lesbian-insults-get-comic-fined-dpgonc-km-20110421_12871288

I know this has degenerated into a pissing match(which I love) but the above article sort of encapsulates why it's dangerous to give on set of people a different set of rules than the rest.

People who are idiots have always been compared to apes regardless of race. At some point in history dumbasses said blacks were apes. We all understand that. Political correctness now prevents us from parodying any black person who is a dumbass. Because of past racists. This is wrong.You should be able to make fun of any idiot you want regardless of race.

Look at where we are headed. In Canada, an insult comic can make fun a fat people, Christians, white straight people ect. Make fun a homosexual, a Muslim, a balck person, your going to get fined, big time.

When you support the piling on of people that make a crack at someone that others are offended by you are supporting this stuff coming here.

Obama is the President of the fucking United States of America. He was voted in to office by the majority of the voters of this country. The majority of which are white. It's time to quit acting like a fucking photshop is destroying the world and proving racism is rampant.

Majority of white kids buy hip hop and R&B, the most popular sports stars are black. The majority of this country doesn't care about color anymore. Only the people on the left that want to promote race wars give a shit about this.

Are their still racists around? Sure, all races black, white, latino have dumbasses that hate other people because of color, but those people have to live in their own miserableness.

But I think the majority of people don't care what color someone is. It's time for thinking people to quit crying over a photoshop of a dumbass.

Nobody here was pushing for a law that would punish racists. The chimps pic is being recognized as racist by more than just the left. You might feel differently but getting upset because some racism is getting called out is just silly. Really, who's being over-sensitive here?

We've been over this before. There should not be laws that punish thought, they're should only be laws that punish actions.

Also, comparing dumbasses to apes is offensive to apes!

goddamn apecists!

Again: What proof have you that there was racist intent?

The e-mail speaks for itself.

Don't bother engaging Pariah, MEM. He has no point. He just wants to feel included...

If it speaks for itself, then there'd be no controversy. It's already been pointed out multiple times that Obama's mother is white, not black. Republicans are not ignorant of this fact. As such, the fact that an ape was used in the photo--rather than a picture of his mother--serves as evidence that its creator sought to illustrate the fact that Obama is a moron (as liberal caricatures did with Bush), and not simply label him as a black person in a malicious fashion.

Prometheus is just worried because the more the subject is dragged out, the more it deflates his assertions about the photo.

Okay, I'm in a good mood. I'll respond:



Is it an obsession, or is it me asking you a single question about it, and making fun of your insecurity?



No, I don't mind staying on the subject you seem so butt-hurt over. The email sent was racist. Period. Fact. End of story. And you can try and worm your way around it with semantics, and anger, and extremist rage at those who have different beliefs than you. But, in the end, you're simply wrong on this one. Sorry. Just because Obama has white parents does not mean that you can say he was born from apes. That's not just fucking stupid (because it is) and childish (because it is) and ignorant (because it is), it's racist (because it is). Obama is black. It's a specific quality that separates him from all previous Presidents, and therefore different rules apply. That's a fact of life. And whether you're sincerely racist yourself and it just bothers you a "nigger" is in the White House, or you've had your mind warped around Conservative talking points so much that you cannot see what is directly in front of you, I don't know. The thing I fear the most about you is that you absolutely deny reality just because you want your "side" to "win". And that.....that would be the epitome of why modern Americans should be ashamed. This "us and them" mentality is ludicrous. You want to know why America is falling behind the rest of the world? Because the millionaires in Washington are dividing us and keeping us at each others throats to distract us from the REAL issues Lobbyists and Corporations are paying them to ignore.

I know you wish your party was perfect, and I know you wish the "EVIL LIBERALS" would all kill themselves and non-whites so that you could feel secure in your position in life. But, in the end, the email was racist, and that is a fucking fact. I realize it makes little sense for me to actually attempt to sway you with logic and rationale. However, unlike how you see me, I don't consider you "pure evil", and just see you as a sad man who is probably lonely, and uses extremist politics to define himself completely. And there is a point where I pity you, and feel sorry for you. Yet, everytime I try to joke with you or yank your chain, you lose your mind on me and go off the rails. I wish you wouldn't, but you don't seem capable of anything else.

And since you believe changing the title of the thread doesn't matter at all, then I'm sure you won't mind if I change it to something I like. Now, don't have an "obsession" and try and change it back. That just shows your "obsession". Right? And we don't want that...



Awww....you poor, sad child. What next? I'm a doo-doo head? Grow up.



I "avoid" (ignore) because I don't know who in the fuck you're talking about. I'm Prometheus. You're Dave, the Wonder "Boy". There is no "Pelosi, Reid, and Schumer" here. They aren't involved in our discussion, and no matter how insistent you are, I simply do not know their beliefs or opinions. I avoid Politics Channels like MSNBC or FOX. I don't keep up with the mud-slinging or the silly-ass ego battles these millionaires in Washington participate in. Because I just don't care. Seriously. Politicians waste time, money, and are not at all interested in bettering our country. Not the politicians on your side of the isle OR the Lefties. They don't care, so I don't care about them. Because to follow them, and follow their beliefs and memorize their ideas and speeches is meaningless to me. It does not, in any way, better my life or those around me. So, therefore, I let the millionaires play their profit-game, and I just keep my head down and try to provide for my family. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yes, I pick on you. Yes, I taunt you. And none of it has to do with your political stance. Pariah, BASMS, and even G-Man (to an extent) have the same political beliefs. And I don't pick on them in the same way. Why? Because they aren't as easy as you are. I fuck with you because you're like a wind-up toy. I wind you up and you go. And it's entertaining. And that's the only reason I come here. To be entertained.

Now, you can choose to believe me, and read all of that with the neutral voice I intend it to have. Or, you can just freak-the-fuck out and do what you always do and simply rant and rave with BOLDED CAPS TO EMPHASIZE HOW EXTREME AND ANGRY YOU ARE!!!!!!

It's up to you.

Sorry Pariah. In all fairness, I did respond to Dave. Would like me to directly respond to you? Or is your mind already made up?

Poor Prometheus. He clearly doesn't care.

But you already did.

Okay man, that's what I thought. You aren't interested in an exchange of ideas or even a debate. You just want to "win". Just like the child you have always been. Sorry for wasting my time offering you a chance to sit with the adults. Back to the kids-table for you...

He's not a big fan of fighting back.

Remember, he's the one who let a bully kick the shit out of him, yet Pariah claims he "won".

He's making a fine addition to the G-shill crew.

Man...

You took 24 whole hours to respond, and that's the best you could do?




There's no "facts" in what you posted, just a bunch of hyperbolic sweeping assumptions, personal slanders and other assorted insults, where you --in completely erroneous pseudo-logic-- postulate that I and other Republican conservatives are racist and just can't handle that there's a black man in the Oval Office.
You even managed to assume thoughts with the word "nigger" and then act like the words came from me and not you.

You fail to grasp that there are many black leaders I've repeatedly suggested as presidential material that I would support, including Colin Powell, J.C.Watts, Herman Cain and the man I voted for in Nov 2010 for the second time, Allen West. Condoleezza Rice is also highly qualified.

For at least 10 years, I've cut through the "white republican racists who won't accept a black president" rhetoric of yourself and others, and pointed out that polls have shown Colin Powell as the most desired candidate for president, if only he would run, from 1992 forward.
And also that Rev. Jesse Jackson won about a dozen states in 1988 primaries, and almost took the nomination away from Dukakis. And Jackson was plenty pissed off that he was not given the nomination.

The larger point being: For at least 20 years the nation has been ready for a black president, slandered white Republicans have been ready for a black president, and I'VE been ready for a black president.

It's not Obama's skin color that makes me reject him, it's his clear marxist/radical indoctrination, and his radical inner circle of close associates: Saul Alinsky, Andy Stern, Cass Sunstein, Jeff Jones, William Ayers, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the Apollo Alliance, George Soros, etc.

It has absolutely nothing to do with Obama's skin color, and everything to do with his radical-left ideology, that I reject him as a worthy or qualified president.
And yet again and again, you turn on the slander machine, and allege racism, and even whip out the n-word.

You allege you're not on the talking points of the Democrats, and yet every news-aware person on these boards knows that Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY) let slip on a radio interview that his caucus instructed all Democrats to use the phrase "right wing extremist" to partisanly demagogue any Republican policy suggestion... and here you are repeating those exact words, over and over, here in this topic!
WOW!! What an amazing, incredible coincidence that is!!
(Oh, gee whiz, I used bold and caps, I must be angry! Or maybe, hard as it is for you to fathom, I just wish to emphasize certain parts so your attention-deficit brain won't miss them.)

Whether you realize it or not, Prometheus, you ARE a partisan liberal. And as such, you can't possibly assume any other motivation by Republicans (i.e, racist, heartless, mean, greedy, etc.) That's why you kneejerk out the shit insinuations that you do.

What is absolutely amazing is the way you accuse me and other Republicans of all thinking one way, as "seeing things in clear black and white" and in the same breath you follow the Democrat talking points and make all these sweeping racist assumptions about those who don't share your political opinion.

Your bias is incriminatingly clear in what you posted. And what you posted demonstrates all the hatred, ideological zealotry and slanderous bigotry you accuse me and other Republicans of.

Thou art truly an idiot.

How can I possibly fight back when I can't even get Prometheus to respond!?

You heard him, he doesn't care!

Care!! CARE DAMN YOU!!

The origin of Pro's "right wing extremist" label.

I offer you an olive branch of reason and honesty, and you respond with the exact same crazy as ever? Congrats. I have never met someone who is so completely detached from reason as you. David, you're a goddamn idiot. We're done. Go obsess over rex. or someone else...

Great. Whatever.

"an olive branch of reason and honesty" ?
( "fucking stupid (because it is) and childish (because it is) and ignorant (because it is), it's racist (because it is... whether you're sincerely racist yourself and it just bothers you a "nigger" is in the White House, or you've had your mind warped...racist racist racist extremist etc etc...")

Yeah. Such an olive branch of concilatory language.

You've got to be kidding. Maybe you're just so high on marijuana you don't know what you wrote.

Can we rename this thread "wondys breakdown April 2011 edition"?

I was kinda wondering about that...

I never noticed Pro being a racist.

I do think he's an enabler of evil and cocksucker piece of shit, talking out both sides of his mouth and whatever else he's been called here.

You mean aside from calling President Obama a "nigger", and then projecting it as if it were my thoughts when he said it?

He's got ya there Pro.

You're the only one who's called the president a "nigger" so far.

I believe the correct term is "kenyan american nigger".

Ok. I haven't read the entire thread.
Show me where he called him a nigger.

OK.
Just tell him he's wrong and let it go at that.

Is your only problem with Pro that he suggested you called Obama a nigger? You seem very pissed over one incident.

Well, I did point out Pro's hypocrisy about 30-plus times here.

He calls me a partisan, but he's the one parroting liberal Reid/Pelosi/Schumer "right wing extremist" talking points. Even as I condemn this Davenport chick and say she should be fired, and he tows the liberal party line that all Republicans are racists who are somehow defending her, even as we all condemn her.

But hey, y'know, I'm the partisan one.

Pro also, as you may have noticed, has a tendency toward personal attacks. But his opinion is so convoluted it ends up being self parody, rather than anything that can be taken overly seriously.
See the "nigger" thing above.

What do you have against pro?

Pro was racist against Wondy's favorite president, Barack Obama.

Holy shit. All the children can do is pick through an intelligent and mature post and find the word "nigger" and then create a fantasy bubble around it as if it wasn't used in the context it was presented? Jesus Christ you people are insane!

LMAO!!

He has nothing against me. That's why he's upset. See this gayness?



Yeah...nothing homosexual about that, right?

Seriously, though? He's just enjoying the attention I've been giving him the past few days. It's change from you, and so he's happy to have someone new to obsess over. You should know that. He's been trying to fuck you for years...

Dude. You called the president a nigger and used quotes as if someone other than you said it.

Do you honestly think an "intelligent and mature" response filled with graemlins is going to make that go away?

Poor poor racist Pro.

you should always capitalize America you America-hating liberal hive mind troll!

oh and pro is a fucking evil enabler!

enabler of cockstealing?

no, that's jeremy.

Pro made Jeremy!

Okay, so--apparently--Pro is a racist now. What all have I missed?

Not much

Obama suggested that Pro called wondie a nagger. This caused Pariah to meltdown for 30 posts or so calling G-man a racist prick. Somehow this is all Rex's fault.

Also, Lothar is a gay.

You think he missed that?

....Ooookaaaaay.

I think it's funny too. But in a bad way.

Wow, not to kiss ass or anything, but that sounds like some crazed Doctor speech.

On the flip side, I think you've probably read enough to know that I disagree with you to a point. Sure, I think in this context that email was meant to be as racist as any and all who've read it should think. However, despite his African heritage, I'm going to have to side with the others in that Obama should be no less immune to being portrayed as a chimp than any other political leader puppet.

A little to tired to get into the whole argument, but the gist of it is that our government/media has so perfectly blurred the lines between fairness and equality that they have retarded what was--once--a promising future of (while, admittedly, not perfect) harmony between the races. Blacks v. Whites, Whites v. Hispanics, Blacks v. Hispanics, and everybody (secretly) hates the everyone that is nominally of Abrahamic origin, Asians, etc.... Meanwhile, while we squabble over the crumbs, the "We're more equal than you" crowd continues to bleed this country dry. In a nutshell, that's all I'm saying.

I can't help but argue against the existence of "sacred cows." I can't help it, I'm a South Park fan. But, I am for both sides learning that there are times in which they must split the proverbial hairs and make a distinction between political statement and racist blathering. This case, for example, seriously pointing to the latter.

Oh, and, Lothar is gay.

Wondie has been gone for two days. I think he broke himself.

Actually, it was Easter and my girlfriend's birthday this weekend, so I spent it offline with her, and didn't concern myself with Pro's petty attempts to win back his internet honor after humiliating himself.

He did so by re-posting the same irrational convoluted post multiple times, completely oblivious to how self-incriminating it was, in its distortion of the facts and utter lack of logic.






Several of Pro's recent posts qualify as full-blown breakdowns.