Again, until they are specifically identified by name and their Facebook and Twitter posts and personal ideology revealed, there is no way to prove these are actual Trump supporters.
And again: of the 200 or so who entered the Capitol building, only about 25 were involved in clashes with police.
One guy I saw identified from a photo said,"I was just in there looking for a bathroom."
But even assuming they are actual Trump supporters, it is your side that drove them to it, by cheating them on election day, and then depriving them of any outlet of dissent, appeal, investigation, or any avenue to redress/appeal government leadership or the courts.
Okay, you seem to be implying my above two quotes are in contradiction, but they're not. But you're not inside my head following my train of thought, so I'll try to clarify.
If you're completely honest, you can't say for certain these were Trump supporters attacking the police, because they have not been identified and apprehended.
Likewise, if I'm completely honest, the same argument is true on my end, that they have not yet been identified and arrested, and not had their online history, posted comments and ideology revealed, so I can't say for certain that they are Antifa/Leftists. So my two statements are not contradictory, because either one could still be true at this point.
But as I posted, I see their methods as more consistent with those of battle-hardened Antifa and BLM protestors, not with the behavior of Trump supporters.
I've watched a lot of coverage on multiple channels over the last 2 days, and watching OAN in particular, there are growing inconsistencies that indicate Antifa/BLM false-flag involvement. Some of it I've posted above. A guy with an 8 PM Monday-Friday show on OAN named Dan Ball (who I honestly don';t particularly like) had some good guests on his show Friday, that I saw replayed this morning. The first guest was a federal contract security specialist who routinely walks in crowds at Washington DC protest rallies as (in equivalent military terms) a forward observer, surveiling the crowds for bad players to give police advance warning, and he walked among Trump protestors at the rally. And then later among them as they moved toward the Capitol building where the clash with police happened. The security specialist said that his experience told him that the rioters had a different personality and demeanor that set them apart from the rest of Trump supporters, as people who had a threatening and almost military demeanor. Not cheerful, respectful and jovial as most at the event were, but instead like agents on a mission, there to cause trouble. On one occasion he notified other officers to take out two that were carrying knives. He said that, from his experience with years of previous demonstrations on the DC grounds, that there were about 35 or 40 that he identified as aggressive players on a mission. He said the mission guys were not all together, but in smaller groups of two or three, until the 35 or 40 joined up outside the Capitol building.
I've also seen similar interviews with about a dozen other Trump ralliers and reporters covering the event that day, and each observed the same thing. They also observed that there was very lax security by Capitol police, and they were surprised to be waved by checkpoint after checkpoint, no resistance from police, and then they were similarly waved inside the Capital building itself, that in retrospect they see as a trick, to set them up for the later allegations. They also said there is more than one entrance, about 100-200 went in and walked around peacefully inside, others could hear the clash elsewhere in the building, or intermittently wandered into the middle of it. Participants interviewed on programs like Stinchfield (Newsmax), Tucker Carlson, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Greg Kelly (Newsmax). There were also people dressed as Trump supporters saying "come on, this way!" leading Trump supporters up to, and some into, the Capitol.
Today I watched about an hour of Orwell's CNN, just for laughs, and it was surreal their version of events.
To watch and believe CNN, Trump gave a speech that was incendiary and directly "incited" the mob of Trump protestors directly on their path to violence. You could almost feel the Trump-hate radiating in hot waves off my TV while watching CNN's version. Well, if that was true, then the violence would have started immediately after Trump's speech, and Trump supporters would have immediately after marched to the Capitol and burst into violence. The only problem is, Trump gave his speech at noon, and the violence didn't start until some time after 2 PM. So they sat around, not stirred to action for quite a while, and probably had forgotten about Trump's speech by that point.
SO SOMETHING ELSE stirred them into making a vigorous protest outside the Capitol, and maybe 200 went inside. As I said, what stirred them to anger was **NOT** Trump's 12-noon speech, it was the news that
V P Mike Pence for no clear reason had pulled the plug on the Senate and House members who were going to make a vigorous case against awarding unlawful electors in multiple contested states.
Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Mo Brooks and other Republican legislators were going to spend several days debating the election result, on-camera on the joint-session Capitol floor, making their case to the American people. Even if the task of seating alternate electors was ultimately doomed to failure in the end, the Republicans loyal to Trump would have at least been able to make their case to the American people in the televised hearings, that the liberal media, propagandists in the Democrat party, at Facebook, Twitter and Google had up to that point collaboratively hidden from the American people.
All anyone expected was
to be able to make their case, win or lose.
They were cheated of that by Pence for reasons not satisfactorally stated in a logical argument.
As were the protestors outside cheated by Pence as well, And by Kelly Loeffler, Lindsey Graham and others who welched on their promise to wage the electoral fight.
As were 74 million Trump voters nationwide cheated.
As well as the 48% of independents, and the 30% of Democrats, who ALSO believe the election was rigged and needed a public debate of that evidence. All cheated of an appropriate review of the evidence.
Jack Posobiec (field reporter for OAN, and also a war veteran) was reporting from among the Trump crowd that day, and at key points went to the roof of the Capitol building to observe from a wider vantage point. He estimated there were about 5,000 protesters gathered around and in the Capitol during the events in question, overwhelmingly peaceful. Posobiec likewise said, having covered many BLM riots over the last year, as well as many Trump rallies, that what he observed at the Capitol violence was more consistent with the organized practiced military-like operations of BLM or Antifa, and not at all like the people at many previous Trump rallies he'd observed. Posobiec said that he'd been on the ground during THREE such Trump rallies in the area, JUST SINCE THE ELECTION, and that this was the ONLY one that uncharacteristically turned the slightest bit violent.
And against previous estimates I quoted from other sources, Posobiec estimated the total crowd on the entire grounds (not just the Capitol area) to be "well over 100,000" Trump protesters.
The leader from a Utah BLM group, named John Sullivan, who I linked previously, was mentioned a lot. Sullivan was interviewed INSIDE THE CAPITOL by CNN !
Sullivan was speculated to have led either some or all of the "Trump supporters" into violence, and certainly has a long record of such militant action and threats with BLM. With his previously vocally stated hatred of Trump and Trump supporters, he certainly wasn't there to protest in support of Trump. Sullivan has repeatedly expressed wanting to physically harm Trump supporters, and a false-flag operation would fill the bill for that nicely.