Add Cristopher Hitchens now to the Obama camp.

 Quote:
Vote for ObamaMcCain lacks the character and temperament to be president. And Palin is simply a disgrace.

By Christopher Hitchens

....Last week's so-called town-hall event showed Sen. John McCain to be someone suffering from an increasingly obvious and embarrassing deficit, both cognitive and physical. And the only public events that have so far featured his absurd choice of running mate have shown her to be a deceiving and unscrupulous woman utterly unversed in any of the needful political discourses but easily trained to utter preposterous lies and to appeal to the basest element of her audience (that's you guys here on the RKMB's BTW - whomod \:\) ). McCain occasionally remembers to stress matters like honor and to disown innuendoes and slanders, but this only makes him look both more senile and more cynical, since it cannot (can it?) be other than his wish and design that he has engaged a deputy who does the innuendoes and slanders for him......


I suppose it could be said, as Michael Gerson has alleged, that the Obama campaign's choice of the word erratic to describe McCain is also an insinuation. But really, it's only a euphemism. Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear had to feel sorry for the old lion on his last outing and wish that he could be taken somewhere soothing and restful before the night was out. The train-wreck sentences, the whistlings in the pipes, the alarming and bewildered handhold phrases—"My friends"—to get him through the next 10 seconds. I haven't felt such pity for anyone since the late Adm. James Stockdale humiliated himself as Ross Perot's running mate. And I am sorry to have to say it, but Stockdale had also distinguished himself in America's most disastrous and shameful war, and it didn't qualify him then and it doesn't qualify McCain now.

The most insulting thing that a politician can do is to compel you to ask yourself: "What does he take me for?" Precisely this question is provoked by the selection of Gov. Sarah Palin. I wrote not long ago that it was not right to condescend to her just because of her provincial roots or her piety, let alone her slight flirtatiousness, but really her conduct since then has been a national disgrace. It turns out that none of her early claims to political courage was founded in fact, and it further turns out that some of the untested rumors about her—her vindictiveness in local quarrels, her bizarre religious and political affiliations—were very well-founded, indeed. Moreover, given the nasty and lowly task of stirring up the whack-job fringe of the party's right wing and of recycling patent falsehoods about Obama's position on Afghanistan, she has drawn upon the only talent that she apparently possesses.

It therefore seems to me that the Republican Party has invited not just defeat but discredit this year, and that both its nominees for the highest offices in the land should be decisively repudiated, along with any senators, congressmen, and governors who endorse them. .....


The gOP.

In disarray.

A national disgrace.

Appealing to baser instincts.

Using deceit.

Taking the electorate for fools.

And some of you here just eat that shit up!

so ... Um, you guys would be that wack job fringe that both Hitchens and Buckley describe.

BTW, What does it mean when the Republican governor of Florida decides he is too busy to help the GOP nominee get in the White House?

Charlie Crist now saying, when it comes to getting McCain elected, quote, "When I have time to help, I'll try to do that. \:lol\:

I think McCain has the stink of loserdom already and smart politicians are keeping their distance.

What is he so busy with BTW? On Saturday, the governor cancelled plans to go to a McCain football base rally to instead go to Disneyworld. \:lol\: \:lol\: