whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Yeah, because the director is a fucking asshole who burned every bridge he'd built with the first flick. Go watch the documentary "Overnight" to see that idiot in action.
Uschi said: I won't rape you, I'll just fuck you 'till it hurts and then not stop and you'll cry.
MisterJLA: RACKS so hard, he called Jim Rome "Chris Everett." In Him, all porn is possible. He is far above mentions in so-called "blogs." RACK him, lest ye be lost!
"I can't even brush my teeth without gagging!" - Tommy Tantillo: Wank & Cry, heckpuppy, and general laughingstock
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Read about it a year or so back and have been waiting for it.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
New Nightmare on Elm Street <object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/B-tSvrkKx2Y&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B-tSvrkKx2Y&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
Are we now supposed to feel sorry for Krueger?
Smells like the gayness of Rob Zombies Halloween snarfness!
Yeah, I'm not a fan of having the slasher in a slasher flick being a sympathetic character. If it's done well, okay; but I'd rather the dude just be evil.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Lucas lost touch with reality in the 80's somewhere. When he redid the trilogy in the 90's and had Greedo shoot first, it just proved it. "I don't think people can root for a guy who just gunned a guy down in cold blood." Um... wasn't Han Solo already an extremely popular character forever cemented into the popular culture by that time? I guess the proper response is, "Yes they can, George. They already did."
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Lucas lost touch with reality in the 80's somewhere. When he redid the trilogy in the 90's and had Greedo shoot first, it just proved it. "I don't think people can root for a guy who just gunned a guy down in cold blood." Um... wasn't Han Solo already an extremely popular character forever cemented into the popular culture by that time? I guess the proper response is, "Yes they can, George. They already did."
i wonder what other creators would redo portions of their own classics, and for what reason, good or bad. like, if the original terminator had a re-release, would there be tweaks because the original budget couldn't afford it? or maybe the indy trilogy was always destined for muppets?
spielberg has always said that if jaws was made today, it'd likely be underwhelming because they'd be able to show a CG shark eating everything in sight, rather than just the dramatic mystery of seeing swimmers suddenly pulled underwater
Lucas lost touch with reality in the 80's somewhere. When he redid the trilogy in the 90's and had Greedo shoot first, it just proved it. "I don't think people can root for a guy who just gunned a guy down in cold blood." Um... wasn't Han Solo already an extremely popular character forever cemented into the popular culture by that time? I guess the proper response is, "Yes they can, George. They already did."
i wonder what other creators would redo portions of their own classics, and for what reason, good or bad. like, if the original terminator had a re-release, would there be tweaks because the original budget couldn't afford it? or maybe the indy trilogy was always destined for muppets?
spielberg has always said that if jaws was made today, it'd likely be underwhelming because they'd be able to show a CG shark eating everything in sight, rather than just the dramatic mystery of seeing swimmers suddenly pulled underwater
The movie was originally titled 'Edwin A. Salt' and starred Tom Cruise until he backed out.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Black Dynamite - Blacksplotation spoof. Looks fucking hilarious.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
![[Linked Image from i6.photobucket.com]](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JoeMama13/RedSoxBanner05.png)
