Coming from the guy who worships one of hitlers biggest fans.
You're referring to a liberal misrepresentation of Pat Buchanan's views.
Buchanan most certainly has condemned Hitler in a number of articles and books of his I've read. On a minor point, he said that historians have turned Hitler into a cartoon, a charicature, of who he truly was. Hitler is often portrayed as a coward in World War I. All Buchanan says is that it is bad and innacurate history to portray Hitler as a coward, when in truth he was very courageous on the battlefield, and was decorated multiple times --and repeatedly wounded-- for his courage on the battlefield. He was a messenger who carried orders back and forth from rear command posts and officers on the front line of battle. Other soldiers who did what Hiler did had a very high ratio of being killed.
As a young man, Hitler was brave on the battlefield.
As a statesman, Hitler early on created jobs and prosperity in Germany. These are facts, and many Germans who lived through the 1930s era described those as prosperous and happy times.
But that does not negate the destruction and genocide that Hitler orchestrated from 1939-forward. And Buchanan, among many others who are falsely portrayed as pro-nazi, is simply pro-historical-accuracy,
not pro-nazi.
