Ah, so you're falling back on being a hypocrite. Not surprising.
If your objection is now that the Palin map was accompanied by violent or militaristic language (ex: "a call to arms") then your attempt to draw a distinction still fails. One of the maps above refers to republican districts as being "behind enemy lines," which is, of course, a military or war term.
But keep splitting those meaningless hairs. I'm sure we won't find more similar rhetoric in both parties to keep making your argument look disingenuous.
