Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
Probably having a rough time finding that name because what I said was pretty simple and recognizably true.


Using a negative to affirm a red herring as the deciding factor of an argument is a lot of things. A "recognizable truth" is not one of them. It's more like verisimilitude.

 Quote:
Why would you say Martin's parents lied or that the prosecutor only tried Zimmerman due to social pressure?


Common sense.

They flip-flopped on whether or not it was his voice.

And this prosecutor--against the better judgement of just about every single competent lawyer in the country--has the audacity to try him for second degree murder. There's no way in hell that would stick with the evidence at hand. She knows this and yet she still went through with it. She is a pandering cunt.