Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy
 Originally Posted By: Pariah
 Originally Posted By: Prometheus
\:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\: \:lol\:

I love it. When the facts start to prove them wrong, the Rightwing Superfriends immediately go into conspiracy mode.

"What? The witnesses DON'T state that Zimmerman was innocent?? WITNESS TAMPERING!! BLACK PANTHERS (but we're not racist, swear)!! LIBERAL MEDIA!! "


\:lol\: \:lol\:


You don't go from describing an assault as "MMA style" to "uh, well, I'm not sure."

Usually, recants occur over night, closer to the initial explanation. Four witnesses changing their stories so severely after two months is unusual, and this case is extremely high pressure.


Being able to see well enough to identify the particular style the assailant was flinging punches makes implausible that the witness couldn't discern at least by their clothes which was on top, and which on the bottom.


Since the witness is saying that the mixed martial arts thing could have been Martin just trying to keep Zimmerman pinned down and that it was too dark to see who was yelling for help, just how well did he see things?

Fair play!