There were other remarks made by the judge that I recall, that were much more personal and prejudicial than what's quoted above. If what's quoted above were the extent of it, I'd agree with the judge, (that Zimmerman not only had an undisclosed $135,000 in donations, but also tried to hide them by transferring the money!) and not consider him biased. But other remarks have been made by the judge.


It's certainly understandable that Zimmerman wants a judge who would rule in his favor. But moving for the judge to be removed --unsuccessfully-- could only piss the judge off and hurt Zimmerman's case.