Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: Ultimate Jaburg53
You think she was a credible witness? She only heard the incident. Story changes, disrespect to the court, wild assumptions as to what sounds she heard was.


I'm going by how she answered questions and what she said she heard. When she was answering questions about Martin using certain words for example you could tell she didn't want to answer. She could have lied but instead didn't. In fact she could have added some things to make Zimmerman look more guilty. She didn't. Yeah she was hard to understand and looked ugly. She lied about her age and about being in the hospital and even revealed that Martin said some nasty things. I'm not naive to think that doesn't play for the defense but her story of what she heard sounds more real than the one Zimmerman has told so far.


What does her looks have to do with it? I'd be saying the same thing if I never saw her. My problems were her assumptions, inconsistent story, and her demeanor.

I don't completely believe Zimmerman either.

We'll never know what really happened.