Originally Posted By: the G-man
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
I heard her testimony so don't bother trying to lawyer your way with turning what she said into something else. If a woman worries about a guy raping her that doesn't mean defending her being worried is somehow hating hetrosexuals. You present flawed logic just to attempt a little dig at me. It always fails and just diminishes yourself.


In any other circumstances,if a man attacked someone simply because he thought that person was gay and was going to rape him (based on nothing more thn Being followed), you would think the attacker (in this case, Martin) was a homophobe and gay basher.

Martins friend, whom you otherwise believe to be credible, has made that allegation.
One would think, therefore, you would be less sympathetic to Martin given your typical positions, generally informed by your status as a gay man.

However, you're so caught up in your need to demonize Zimmerman that you're acting/speaking inconsistent with your usual positions.


First your defense of sexual assaults is interesting. I'm assuming this logic/defense of yours is just reserved for this instance. Whatever. You assume Zimmerman didn't do more than just follow Martin. Martin's friend however testified she heard Martin ask Zimmerman why he was following him and than Martin's last words "get off, get off". Of course if you believe the guy who slapped his fiance around and assaulted a police officer with violence, Martin jumped out of nonexistent bushes and other places or out of nowhere attacking Zimmerman.


An aside to WB, Zimmerman was originally charged with assaulting a cop with violence. He admits this in documents when he was trying to become a police officer. Yes the charge was reduced and than went away. Does that mean he than didn't attack a police officer? No and you wouldn't think so normally. So why is this different?

Fair play!