UGLY: CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NYT Ignore Antifa Violence, Beating of Andy Ngo


 Quote:

By Curtis Houck, July 1, 2019


In an update to the coverage totals posted by NewsBusters’s Nick Fondacaro here and here, the flagship major broadcast networks CBS and NBC still have yet to acknowledge the Antifa violence committed on Saturday in Portland, Oregon, which included the brutal beating and milkshaking of Quillette’s Andy Ngo, which left him badly injured with a brain bleed.

Along with CBS and NBC, MSNBC and The New York Times have joined them in the refusal to denounce this legitimate, actual attack (sorry not sorry, Jim Acosta) on a journalist for simply doing their job. And since Sunday’s Good Morning America, ABC had not offered an update.

In contrast to MSNBC, fellow liberal cable network CNN had at least offered a decent share of coverage considering their aversion to anything that goes against their preconceived narratives and endorsement of Antifa’s radical, violent actions and beliefs by some at the network.

Since 5:00 a.m. Sunday morning, CNN has spent five minutes and 26 seconds on the violence in Portland. Unfortunately, 47 seconds of that time (spread out over two hours of CNN Newsroom) didn’t note that one of those hurt was, in fact, a journalist (who also happens to be Asian and gay).

Monday’s CNN Right Now devoted a full report to what transpired, including Ngo’s injuries. However, the story was spun with Ngo being dubbed a “conservative blogger” and mentioned alongside “far-right,” white nationalist groups like the Proud Boys.

So, yes, folks, CNN played the “both sides” card.


When it came to describing Antifa, here was how Sidner described them :

  • Look, you had a couple of different groups that came into Portland to protest, to share their message, far-right groups, to spread their message to the masses, whoever would listen to them, and they often gather at different squares and that's exactly what happened here, but often, as is normal in Portland, there is always a huge reaction to that. Sometimes far bigger than the far-right groups and, in this case the same, who have gathered. The Antifa — anti-fascists, if you will, came out for sure and we should, you know, sort of be clear that there are a lot of different people that were out there who may not consider themselves a member of the anti-fascist group, but there are certainly a group called Rose City Antifa, who was out there[.]


Sidner showed pictures and video of Antifa attacking Ngo and pictures from his trip to the emergency room with some injuries sustained from being “getting hit with what looked like a milkshake, but police were very clear in saying, look, it appears that there was some sort of quick-drying cement that was mixed into that so-called milkshake.”

To Sidner’s credit, she then denounced Antifa and ruled that cities like Berkeley, California, and Portland, Oregon need to have “a serious conversation” because of “have groups like this who are there in — to be militant and to violently oppose people from the right.”


“[ B]ut then you see the violence unleashed on this conservative blogger and it's unacceptable behavior. Even if you don't like the ideals, the whole point is that you're allowed to have free speech in this country and I think that's a conversation that America needs to — needs to have, especially in cities like Portland, where this happens quite often,” she added, before spending the rest of the segment ruling harping on the Proud Boys and other far-right groups.

Going to the major newspapers, The Times was silent in the MRC’s Washington Edition copies (for Sunday and Monday). The Washington Post wasn’t much better, providing a partial Associated Press wire story on A3 in Sunday’s print edition. The total word count? A scant 239 words accompanied by the headline “Opposing groups clash in downtown Portland.”

USA Today’s first print edition since Ngo’s attack came on Monday and, like CNN, they did more than a few seconds on it. Reporter John Bacon had a 350-word dispatch on 2A that, also like CNN, had a similar spin with the print headline “Right- and left-wingers battle in Oregon” (altered slightly for the online one here).

Here’s an excerpt:
  • Oregon's largest city was calm and quiet Sunday after a day of chaotic, competing protests that clogged Portland streets, crippled public transit and left at least eight people injured.

    Police in riot gear broke up the demonstrations as clashes developed among law enforcers, anti-fascist "antifa" protesters and right-wing groups. Three people were charged with crimes ranging from assault on a police officer to harassment, police said.

    (....)

    Andy Ngo, an editor with the conservative website "Quillette," tweeted photos of cuts and bruises on his face. He said on Twitter he was hit multiple times with fists and weapons.

    "Attacked by antifa. Bleeding," he tweeted. "They stole my camera equipment. No police until after. waiting for ambulance. If you have evidence of attack please help."

    Protesters also clashed with police, throwing water bottles and eggs at officers, and three were among those injured.

    Police had reports of protesters throwing "milkshakes" – with a substance mixed in that was similar to a quick-drying cement.




I'd also point out the media similarly focused on "right wing racist violence" in Charlottesville 2 years ago, while ignoring the antifa who outnumbered the white supremacists more than tenfold (Antifa in the thousands, white supremacists maybe 200 to 300) and were (as I ctied at the time with youtube videos of Antifa) constantly attacking white supremacists and provoking violence, where otherwise the supremacists would have just peacefully marched. And that the majority of conservative demonstrators (about 2,000) were not white supremacists, just retired police and military protesting only for preservation of the Robert E. Lee statue, who actually aasked the 200-300 white supremacists to leave. But all were portrayed by the liberal media as "white supremacists".

Over and over, the liberal media are eager to over-report alleged incidents of "right wing violence". And even in the case of Tea Party protests that were 100% peaceful, portrayed them as "threatening". Despite that the attacks were by Leftists on Tea Party members! In one case, a white union thug beat up a black Tea Party member and it went unreported. Whereas if it were reversed and had been a white conservative attacking a black liberal, it would have been national news with maximum coverage of "dangerous right wing racists attack black protestor."

The same thing here. When a gay conservative is attacked, and even hospitalized with brain damage from the attack, the liberal media absolutely refuses to report it. Because it doesn't fit the liberal narrative they want to sell to the public of a "growing threat of dangerous right wing violence". Despite that the attacks are overwhelmingly by the LEFT wing.


Just a reminder which side the real violence is on:

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018...ump-supporters/