Okay, now you're just spewing ad hominem to make your case seem more valid. Nothing you say about your self-proclaimed monopoly in understanding physical attraction will suddenly overlook Rucka's intent to characterize Montoya's awareness of being in the closet. At which point, her character wouldn't suggest she'd trap herself in a marriage that she'd hate. Going over the severity of physical attraction and then saying it can easily be thrown in the backseat sounds so cheap especially with an 'I-don't-expect-you-to-understand-it' tune. Being human, I understand emotion well enough. Please don't imply otherwise simply cuz' you're gay and I'm not.
