Originally Posted By: whomod
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man


So Obama's negative attacks are just merely responses? How was it a response when he milked the sniper fire gaffe? That & other attacks happened even before he flubbed up that last debate & whined about needing to rise above that type of thing. Sorry but Obama's talking points just fall flat when you examine his "responses".


Conflating Barack Obama and CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and FOX doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It wasn't Obama playing and re-playing the videos of Hillary's bald faced lies, it was the media.


Don't deny that Obama's campaign used it to also attack her Whomod. I think the talking point at the time was that they were just "responding" to questions by reporters. Now it's a case of Obama decrying the use of these types of distractions while his campaign conducted a conference call trying to revise the sniper fire story that she apolgised for at the last debate.
Political Punch

You can't give him credit for being above it all when he's willing to get in the gutter too IMHO. And let's be clear I don't blame him for trying to have it both ways, it's just dissapointing that your willing to run with it.

Fair play!