Originally Posted By: the G-man
...

And, as noted above, even that argument requires a spinning of the vote totals that is at least as fuzzy, if not moreso, than the tally put forth by Obama.


I thought Hillary's count was based on the simplest basis. If you voted for her it counted as voting for her if there was a vote total from that state available. On the other hand Obama count has more fuzziness to it. For example, he has no problem scooping up almost half of Michigan's pledged delegates plus a couple of Hillary's, those numbers are good but the actual vote shouldn't count because he took his name off the ballot when it looked advantagous for his campaign? I think if he's taking the pledged delegates looted from Hillary & others than he really can't believably claim those votes don't count.

Fair play!