I don't disagree, but I think the attack will be more difficult than it would've been against a candidate without the same back story.

After all, she's the first pro-life candidate who is a woman. That automatically eliminates that old cliche feminists use of "[the candidate] wouldn't feel that way if [the candidate] was a woman."

As another poster noted, the hard core feminists weren't going to vote for the GOP in any event. Her appeal is going to be to moderates and independents (or conservative democrat women) who wouldn't have otherwise voted Republican.

And, again as noted above, in a close race in a swing state that could decide the election.