You just can't make this kind of stuff up.


Babes revealed amid his cranky non-denial on pic

• By S.A. MILLER in Washington and PERRY CHIARAMONTE AND CHUCK BENNETT in NY
  Last Updated: 10:31 AM, June 1, 2011
  
  
  
  [Some of Weiner's Twitter-women he follows]
  It takes a certain type of woman to set his heart a-Twitter.
  
  Rep. Anthony Weiner follows only a select 198 of his nearly 49,000 Twitter fans -- and a surprising number of them are total babes.
  
  Yesterday, outside his DC office, the model-loving, married congressman testily refused to talk about the pretty women he's following.
  
  
  He flashed a tight, uncomfortable smile and avoided eye contact as he tried to deflect point-blank questions from reporters about whether or not he had sent a crotch shot of himself in underwear to a 21-year-old co-ed in Seattle.
  
  
  'I'VE BEEN PRETTY RESPONSIVE'
  
  A touchy Rep. Anthony Weiner yesterday refuses to answer questions about his penchant for linking to sexy online admirers like the one above.
  "Was it from you or not," demanded CNN's Capitol Hill producer Ted Barrett.
  
  To which the squirming Weiner replied:
  
  "If I were giving a speech to 45,000 people and someone in the back threw a pie or yelled out an insult, I would not spend the next two hours of my speech responding to that pie or that insult.
  
  "I would return to the things that I want to talk about to the audience that I want to talk to. That is what I intend to do this week."
  
  Then in another cringeworthy exchange, the Brooklyn-Queens Democrat unloaded a snarky insult instead of saying why he didn't pass on to Capitol Police his claim that his Twitter account had been hacked -- which would be a federal crime.
  
  "I'm going to have to ask that we follow some rules here. One of them is going to be you ask questions and I'll do the answers. That seem reasonable? . . . You do the questions, I do the answers, and this jackass interrupts me?" a fuming Weiner said of Barrett.
  
  But reporters persisted, asking Weiner if he followed the co-ed on Twitter and whether he had other "young women followers" -- with one barking: "Answer the question!"
  
  Instead, the famously temperamental Weiner looked annoyed, rolled his shoulders and argued -- but never said whether or not he sent the picture.
  
  "This is now Day Three," he intoned. "You have statements that my office has put out. And there are going to be people . . . this is the tactic. The guy in the back of the room who's throwing the pie or yelling out the insult wants that to be the conversation."
  
  He took more tacks than a sailboat as he tried to not explain the Twitter tempest.
  
  "Look, this was a prank that I've now been talking about for a couple of days," he said. "I'm not going to allow it to decide what I talk about for the next week or the next two weeks.
  
  "And so, I'm not going to be giving anything more about that today. I think I've been pretty responsive."

Ahh Weiner... too bad he couldn't just play "hide the sausage" --with his wife, and had to display the goods on Twitter.

Gutfeld had some funny but insightful takes on the whole thing

From Redeye last night.

You put three wieners in the thread title. Just fucking come out of the closet already.

Hey, them's just the facts, rex.

Exactly. Stop lying to yourself and come out.

Can't a guy just enjoy a little Weiner and not be judged?

Something I've never been quite sure about.

"Why-ner" or "Wee-ner?"

He himself pronounces it <wee-ner>.

I've seen him interviewed and discussed many times.



Comics writer Len Wein likewise pronounces his name <ween>.
For many years I pronounced it <whine> until I was corrected by a comics dealer who grew up in the same New York neighborhood as Wein.

In comparing the scandals of Rep. Chris Lee (who e-mailed a girl a shirtless photo of himself online through CraigsList), as compared to Rep Weiner, in the first three days there were 200 stories on Republican Lee, vs. only 70 stories on Democrat Weiner.

Yet another arguable case of media bias and double-standard, when it comes to reporting about a guy on their ideological team.

Statistical fact does not =

I think Wondy has found his arch-nemesis armed with the Penis of Untruth. Watch out, G-Man, Rep. Weiner is coming to impale you in vengeance of the impaling Wondy gave Pro.

Please don't drag me into the latest WB/Rex weiner fight. Those two are quite capable of crossing swords on their own.

IN THE ASS!!!

if you know what h- ahh fuckit

Man!

I was just looking at Weiner's background, and looked up his wife as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin



Aside from being quite attractive, she's a power player in the state department, with a close relationship to both Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Weiner has been married to this lady for barely a year. I'd think he'd rather be having hot pounding newlywed sex on a regular basis, rather than following 198 other women on twitter, and sending them crotch-photos of himself.


On Redeye last night, Greg Gutfeld speculated that it might have been Huma who twittered the crotch photo on Weiner's account, as payback for her disapproval of his twitter activities with other women, and/or his extramarital affairs.

More Huma pics:

http://www.wikipedia.com

That top one's actually Susanna Hoffs from the Bangles.

She is a babe.

Walk Like an Egyptian is the only song I can think of right now from bangles. Was that their only hit?

They had at least a half dozen hits during the eighties that I can think of:

And, while not exactly "hits" they had a couple of decent covers of songs by, respectively, Elvis Costello, Big Star and Katrina and the Waves:

(Not sure how they got Nimoy to do that last video, BTW)

And, yes, Susanna Hoffs, was, and is, INSANELY hot

What can I say?

I found it in a Huma Abedin search and the photo came up. If you look at the text of the photo I posted, it has Huma's name in the JPG text. They used it for a trivia quiz of who she's dating, from before her and The Weiner got married.

A bit more Weiner-centric humor for your viewing entertainment, this time from Jon Stewart.



Apparently Stewart has a longstanding friendship with Weiner from their early days, and they used to hang out together at a mutual friend's beach-house. Which makes Stewart a witness of sorts to what Weiner may or may not be packing in the bulging shorts department.

This is the first time I've seen any media source display the actual oft-mentioned but previously unshown Weiner Crotch Photo.

Woah.

Well, by Stewart's account, a friendship of long standing.

But that Weiner himself stands rather short.

Congressman cancels Wisconsin speech following lewd photo scandal: Rep. Anthony Weiner canceled a scheduled speech in Wisconsin Friday in the wake of the media storm over a lewd photo that appeared on his Twitter account.



The NY Post is having a field day with the headlines about this case

Yeah, the late-night comedians and the newspapers in general are having a lot of fun with the Weiner scandal.

Greg Gutfeld says: "...This is my favorite story EVER!"

There is absolutely no way in hell you know that as a fact. The media is going nuts over this. You're merely seeing the world through a prism of personal preference, as usual.

Poor Pro. Lost in denial all over again.

Or maybe he's just preying on an easy hyperbole-based response to win himself some kudos while avoiding the fact that this story was more slow-building than others (considering the date it was revealed).

Either way, he's still chugging that Kool-Aid.

He posted that right after it was said on fox news. Him g-man do it all the time.

He left out the disclaimer about how everyone knew it was the other guy because his face was in the picture.

It was reported on Fox News during their morning broadcast. It was during an interview of Brent Bozell, who runs a media watchdog group.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/2011/06/07/bozell-column-media-go-leaner-weiner

I always find it laughable when Promod alleges my bias. If you looked at 9-plus years of my posts, while I'm certainly a conservative, I've voiced plenty of dissent from W.Bush and other Republicans. Especially when they're involved in something like what The Weiner is involved in.

Whereas you, Pro, consistently drink 200-proof liberal Kool-aid, and vomit it up here on these boards periodically, whole and undigested, liberal talking points fully intact.

He just doesn't understand that FOX is fair and balanced WB.

It has been interesting seeing a bunch of conservatives get far more excited by an uderwear shot than I ever have.

Why are you crying Pro?

Oh wait...am I supposed to accept FOX Entertainment Group as "fact" now?

Suuuuuure JQ, sure.

Pro! Calm down! You're becoming hysterical!

Did you make sure to take your midol?

I....see....

Weiner admits he sent lewd Twitter picture, refuses to resign:

• A "deeply ashamed" Weiner openly wept during a news conference this afternoon in Manhattan -- admitting that he made "terrible mistakes" in sending lewd pictures of himself to women he met on Facebook and Twitter over the past few years.
  
  Weiner, who choked back tears several times, also said he was "not resigning" -- but took "full responsibility for my actions" over the last few years.

I could really give a damn about this man's perversions. However, he had to know that what he was doing would be all over the media if he got busted doing it. He did it anyway. This proves he is somewhat stupid. He then lied about to his constituents and the American people only when it became clear that more damaging photos were coming out. This, more than his sordid behavior is why he needs to step down.

It sounds like this Weiner didn't actually commit adultry nor do anything illegal. What he did was stupid but many people from both parties have been there, done that and went on in politics. Newt for instance actually committed full on adultery on a wife that had cancer. (or was that Rudy? Both?)

Anyways, I don't think he should step down and hopefully voters will forgive him.

and enables evil.

Yeah. This isn't worth the pain in the ass of finding someone to take his place.

When the obvious becomes obvious, confess and admit it before Breitbart and others release a treasure-trove of compromising photos.

I love how he slandered Breitbart, and then a few days later Weiner was forced to admit that every last word that Breitbart said is true. Breitbart demanded an apology, and Weiner --when bludgeoned with the facts-- finally made a full apology.

i.e., "I'm sorry I got caught, and can no longer hide my bad judgement by blaming others, so okay, now that I slandered everyone reporting it, I'll admit to what really happened before you release your vast reserve of compromising photos of me. So yeah, I'm sorry, but not really, I'm just saying whatever might give me the slightest chance of keeping my political office."

Well, I hesitate to label penis photos on Twitter as "evil".

But otherwise, Weiner is clearly wrong, and likely to be expelled from office for his actions.

And Prometheus is a partisan zombie parroting the current liberal talking points.
Again.
While accusing me of being partisan.
Ironically enough.

I agree with iggy...Weiner needs to step down now.

Prove it.

You don't quote glen beck so you're a dirty commie.

It's really that simple for him.

I've already demonstrated repeatedly across multiple topics that you use the exact words, and I mean the EXACT words, of liberal talking points as you bash conservative Republicans.

As you pile on the slanderous partisan caricatures in your leftist hate diatribes.

I keep exposing your lunacy, you keep changing the subject and hiding behind emoticons. (i.e., )

World Wonders What Happened to the Jon Stewart who said if guilty Weiner should resign

I guess you're referring to this show of Stewart's.


Now that Weiner's been proven guilty as sin, Stewart will probably do his best to burn every known copy of the show, committed leftie that he is.

You're both morons. If you actually watched the show, he STILL said he should resign. Fuckssake, he did a fifteen-minute skit about it at the top of the show the day after Weiner admitted his guilt...

First of all, the only Republicans I regularly "bash" are extremists like the Tea Party and the freaks on FOX Entertainment.

Second, you consistently accuse me of using "the exact Liberal talking points". Yet, at no time have I copied and pasted anything. I'm just speaking from the heart, the mind, and the realm of common sense and rational thought. So, the fact that you see anything of my opinion as "Liberal talking points" is merely your own partisan-paranoia, as ever. Believe what you like, dude.



Waaaaah! You have no sense of humor and are easily ruffled! Waaaaah! Jeez, Dave, cry me a river man. Get over it. It's just the internet. Ignore my jokes if you don't like them. Bitching about it just makes you sound like a pussy.



Exposing? Exposing what?? The only thing you've exposed is YOUR absolute nutso bias and beliefs. No one...and I mean NO ONE...is on your wavelength here. No one agrees with your fantasy extremist attitude and hypocritical beliefs! No one ever pipes up and says, "Hey that Wonder Boy sure makes a lot of sense!". No one!! Everyone from BSAMS, to Rex, to G-Man, to Rob, to Mxy, to....to everyone.....we all think you're batshit insane. We tell you that constantly. How do you filter that out? How do you not see that you are the Loony-Right that even The Right is embarrassed by? How?!

Sorry, there isn't an emoticon strong enough to describe the amount of psychotic denial on your part. So, I'll just use this one again ---> !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get a grip, David...

Hey that Wonder Boy sure makes a lot of sense!

And thus I prove my exact point...

I saw what you deleted....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_congressman_twitter_photo

His wife might be pregnant. This just got really good.

Now there's a little weiner in the picture.

You're fast. I bet you have been told that before.

And yet you keep stringing together the same words as the Schumer/Reid/Pelosi talking points. Right.Wing.Extremist.

What an incredible coincidence!




Yeah, so funny, the way you call the president a nigger.

As is manifest in the above sample, it seems to me you get pretty angry and apoplectic in your so-called "humor".





Don't look now, but you just got apoplectic again.

I know you like to paint it that way. But beyond your delusion, many here do agree with my political views.
Pariah agrees with me quite a bit.
G-man and I are often in agreement. What he dissented from me on was my taking the bait from Rex and other trolls like yourself, not for my political views.
Mr JLA used to be in agreement with me often, until he, for reasons I don't really understand, apparently had some kind of awakening and turned more liberal, at least on anti-corporate and pro-union issues.
Rob Kamphausen has never said an unkind word to me, and on several occasions has e-mailed me and invited me to come back and post, when I was away too long.

Even BSAMS and Rex, despite not voicing solidarity with me, basically post the exact same conservative views that I do (i.e., Obama is a left-extremist radical who wants to destroy capitalism, and whether by design or stupidity Obama is destroying our economy, and needs to be voted out of office).
In BSAMS' case, he too periodically watches Glenn Beck, and often posts articles and video from The Blaze(Beck), HotAir (Michelle Malkin), and other conservative sites that, if you had any sanity and logic to your argument, are at least as if not more right-wing than what I post.

Iggy may or may not agree with me, I think he at turns agrees and disagrees with parts of what I say. He likewise used to post Pat Buchanan columns, until he was irrationally vilified for it, as I was. The difference between the two of us is he doesn't wish to post what is unpopular with the rest of you, whereas I'll post it to be read whether you like it or not, if I feel the points are well made.

So when you say "everybody", you really mean your merry little clicque of trolls. A group of 5 or so, of you, the doctor, rex (oh there's an ally that hurts your superior sanity argument) Newt, Sammitch, and a few others who barely post here.

You guys pretty much have the same contempt for G-man, Pariah, and (until he changed political poles and becaame a liberal) Mr JLA, as you have for me. And your collective angry troll antics have pretty much chased away any other prospective new posters for several years now, with the angry hysterics you're unleashing on me right now.

Why do I even bother?

He was also upfront when this started that Weiner was a friend of his.

lulz

Seriously, Pro, why do you respond to WB? He's not going to rationally consider your opinion. He blows up way too easily for it to be fun to troll him.

You mean this?

• A parody of Weiner's Monday press conference, Stewart's opening sketch was built around the joke of the comedian mimicking Weiner as he himself "took full responsibility" for his limited and tame response Monday to Weiner's confession of engaging in creepy online, telephone and social media relationships with women half his age. In Stewart's comic press conference, he announced that as a result of his Monday night failings, he was resigning as host of "The Daily Show." Weiner, while saying over and over Monday how he was "taking full responsibility," did not resign from Congress -- despite widespread calls for him do so. The buzz from the bit this morning will probably be about Stewart really cutting his hand during the fake press conference and bleeding throughout the last one-third of it. I'd like to say he was suffering for his art. But his performance fell short of being particularly clever or funny, let alone artistic. Stewart seems conflicted. At any rate, something has him off his game, he just can't seem to find his comedic voice on this issue. You can read AP's account of his injury here. I would add as a footnote for your consideration a reminder as to what the Freudians say about there not being any pure accidents. I'n only half kidding. But whether you think this bit was funny or not, what matters most about Stewart's Tuesday night show is what he did NOT do in connection with Weinergate: any media criticism. Stewart has been dead wrong for the past week in trying to rip the press, particularly CNN, for its aggressive coverage of Weiner. Read my criticism of him here. If nothing else, Monday vindicated that aggressive, professional coverage from the mainstream media, and Stewart does not seem interested in acknowledging that -- or his own off-base criticism of media outlets like CNN. I think Stewart really wimped-out Tuesday night in trying to blame his lame Monday night performance on the facts that Weiner's press conference was at 4:30 p.m. Monday and his show taped at 6. In the comedic skit, he said he "took full responsibility" for deciding to include a few jokes about it at the top of Monday's show while otherwise sticking mainly with the scripted show. In the media world that Stewart is otherwise so happy to mock, we have short deadlines almost every day and night -- and we are never allowed to blame them for incomplete or inaccurate stories. In the correction box of a mainstream newspaper, have you ever seen short deadlines blamed? No, it is just "we were wrong and we apologize for the mistake." If it is wrong or incomplete, then don't put it out there. Blaming a short deadline is weak and phony for someone who wants to play a media critic on TV like Stewart does. Also, check out this tweet from Stewart published before Monday night's show. Does this sound like someone who feels he doesn't have time to do a proper job? Only after the reviews of his performance Tuesday, did Stewart claim this excuse.

That doesn't sound like a call for Weiner's resignation to me, but if you have a link to another bit where he did I'd be happy to review it,

Does this mean we need to start talking about a pre-2011 JLA?



That's because he wants in your pants, dude.



Penis of Truth. Fucker of Socks. What's BSAMSchwab's nickname for this superhero club?



And, I still read Pat's columns when they are released. However, I'm also willing to signify were Pat and I don't see eye-to-eye. So long as he is talking about things like foreign policy and the economy, we are in agreement. Once he starts talking social issues though, I'm out. However, as much as I like you as a person, it can sometimes seem that you believe it because Glenn Beck went on some deranged rant about it. Like if Glenn Beck says George Soros is trying to destroy America through secretly funding the gays fighting for equal rights who are secretly economic time bombs waiting to go off in all their communistic glory and bring capitalist society down on its kness and then cum on it; then it feels like we are going to hear about it through you on these forums as if it is gospel. Not that I want a jihad declared on me or anything like that, but it sounds at times like There is no nutjob but Glenn Beck and Wonder Boy is his prophet. And, I think that is what people generally troll you about. Like, at this point, even if you aren't talking about Glenn Beck all a few posters will be able to imagine is you typing your post while wearing a tin foil hat and watching seventeen monitors all turned to Glenn Beck. You've just given them so much ammo over the years they will never see you as anything else but a nutjob (right-wing extremist).

But, on the flip-side, I don't think I can troll you about it that much because I'm probably a bigger nutcase then Beck could ever hope to be. Honestly, I think what makes Glenn and his followers sound so silly is that they try to turn it all into some vast left-wing conspiracy. Personally, I believe there is a conspiracy but it doesn't really have a political affiliation. The whole left-wing/right-wing thing is the trap to keep us fighting each other rather than getting at the elitist bankster scum that is really destroying this country though their control over both sides of the political spectrum. Okay, end rant.

Still, crazy as I sound, somehow even I can't bring forth the feeling in people that they are talking to a complete nutjob like you can. Then, rather than just letting them call you batshit, you feel the need to type a five hundred word rave on why you aren't batshit. Let. It. Go. Otherwise, you just go from just batshit to a batshit, five-star, ten course meal for trolls.

Personally, I think you are an okay guy who I agree with on quite a few issues. However, you have a tendency to get fairly bombastic in your rhetoric and a little melodramatic when others troll you about it. And, in that regard, I have to side with Pro in saying, "Calm down. It's only the internet."



Jack Kirby.

Let it go, Iggy. I tried giving him the same advice years ago. Now, I'm just another left-wing, God/America hating commie with plans of destroying WB's good name.

You gotta know when to hold 'em. Know when to fold 'em. Know when to walk away and know when to run.

He was the coward of the county.

I am the Ill Mac...

iggy User [Insert Custom Title Here]
3000+ posts 06/09/11 12:53 PM Checking who's online

I'm Mxy!

LIES AND SLANDER

I guess....honestly...I'm a little fascinated. I've never seen a condition like his up-close. The denial is palatable. I sort of pity his inability to snap out of it. But, you're right, I should probably just ignore him...



The Unfuckables?



ENABLER!!



Wow. You and I are long-lost twins. If we ever meet in real-life, I'll give you a copy of all the Conspiracy documentaries I have downloaded.

Dude....really? THAT was your point? He didn't LITERALLY "call for Weiner's resignation" after the dude admitted his guilt? Was it not enough that he did so beforehand? Is it not enough he up-front blatantly stated he and Weiner were real-life friends and that he was facing a conflict of interest (thus personified by said skit with John Oliver)? Could it be that he's a comedian who never called for Bush, Cheney, or Rumsfeld's resignation? Isn't it a fact that his show on COMEDY Central has no political sway one way or the other? What would be the point of him asking for Weiner's resignation over showing his dick to some hotties, if he never asked for it when the last White House gang killed thousands of innocent soldiers and civilians?

Sorry. I can't see your point here. I think Stewart's doing exactly what he's always done, and suddenly you want him to go after the people "your side" says are "evil". I don't expect that kind of partisan tact from you. You're better than that, Gary Geoff Gordon Manley...

Sounds good.

Honestly, while I still allow for pinpointing one's position (i.e. liberal, conservative, or whatever), I've met and befriended many people "on the other side" who have similar views. It is mainly the people who feel compelled to be deeply partisan that really grind my gears. So often, the answer to their problems is right there in front of them if they just follow the money, but party loyalty just refuses to let them recognize it. Hell, my finding allies on the other side has--in a way--been my one consolation for the falling out I've had with "my side of the fence." I've completely fallen out with what now calls itself "The Tea Party." It has, for the most part, been co-opted. Once, it cared about things like the Fed and true deficit reduction. Now, they are lining up to vote for a man (Herman Cain) who was once on the board of directors for the federal reserve bank in Kansas City. WTF?

I've also been looking more deeply into the effects of media conglomeration on how the race for 2012 is sizing up. Watching the way they do things really shows you who are the acceptable candidate to the elite. The most egregious example I've seen of this was on O'Reilly a few weeks back. The cherry-picked the poll so badly that if you took the time to count up the percentages shown, they left out nearly a third of respondents answers. My question: what did that thirty percent say that was "less news worthy" than pointing out guys like Santorum and Gingrich were only polling one or two percent? Sorry, getting on a tangent.

Anyway, glad we share similar thoughts on this subject.

Somehow, I can sort of picture Pro and Iggy spending a whole afternoon listening to conspiracy documentaries. But the visibility is going to be severely limited by all the pot smoke in the room.

You're probably right.

I'm a PC!!

Says the dipshit who back around 2003 scolded me and says he slapped me on "ignore", and has continued to allege that, and yet regularly snipes at my posts, for lo these many years.

I don't "blow up", easily or otherwise, I just minimally respond to your hypocritical idiocy.

Yeah, because that lengthy rant of antagonism, parodying my views, and other assorted insults was such a polite attempt to reason with me in a mutually respectful discussion.


Who are you kidding, Pro?

Like you, I don't agree with all Pat Buchanan's points, much as I respect him. I'm not Catholic, and don't share his views on social issues either. Although I'm much more pro-life than I used to be, I don't really care if my elected leaders are pro-life advocates, and I actually find politicians who make a big issue of it (example: Rick Santorum) to have warped priorities and exploiting emotions.

I'm torn on Buchanan's relatively isolationist views on the U.S. being the global cop. He advocates George Washington's advice to "avoid foreign entanglements" and "wars that are not in our national interest", but our national interest can sometimes be difficult to define.
If we didn't ally with Stalin in W W II, the Axis power would likely have conquered Eurasia and eventually invaded the Americas as well.
If we hadn't taken decisive action (that Europeans were not taking) the conflict in Bosnia and Croatia could have expanded into a far wider regional conflict or even a third world war.
If we let Saddam Hussein keep Kuwait in 1990, or further invade the Arabian peninsula, Hussein could have cut off the flow of oil to the West and crippled our economy.
These are arguably all in our national interest.
So I'm not sure I support Buchanan's more isolationist views, among other views he has. I post what I agree with, and likewise post what I agree with of Glenn Beck's commentary.

But I agree with a lot of Buchanan's commentary. I don't read his columns every week, but I've read his last five books, and he backs his views with considerable supporting evidence.




You are, of course, playfully making fun of Beck. I've never heard Beck say anything about gays. What he says about George Soros manipulating currencies and toppling financial systems is common knowledge and far from paranoia.
Soros' funding of liberal media sources and liberal think tanks to attack the U.S. government and conservatives, to the tune of 48 million dollars this year, are likewise well documented.
Soros' vision to collapse the U.S. dollar and reign us into a global government (while enriching himself by investing in assets that gain from the dollar's collapse) are also well known.

And I believe that based on evidence and well-researched books on the subject, many of them showcased, and authors interviewed, on Glenn Beck's program. Charlie Rose is another program I've seen these writers interviewed.

I don't believe it "just because Beck said it". I believe it because I've looked at the evidence. There are many days where I flip the channel on Beck because he's just ranting without facts to back it up. But when he cites facts I can read for myself, yes, I believe him.





I can't be held responsible for other people's perception. I certainly cite facts to back my views, and Beck when I quote him likewise cites facts.

And you unwittingly hit on the main point: It's not even political discussion of the issue by them, it's just pure trolling.




I think you don't fully understand Becks POV.

If you watched his program on a regular basis, you'd see that he says:
1) the whole Left/Right thing is a distraction from the globalist ideology that infests both parties. That McCain is in many ways near-identical in views to Obama on issues like border security, the TARP bailout, further economic U.S. integration with Mexico and Canada, etc.
Beck argues that all the left/right bickering is a deliberate distraction by the puppet masters of both parties and the media, so they can continue to move us away from sovereignty and toward global integration and collapse of the dollar, no matter which party is in power.

2) Beck doesn't "try to turn it into some vast left-wing conspiracy", he just points out what LEFTISTS THEMSELVES HAVE SAID. It's not paranoid speculation, he is quoting these radicals! Van Jones, Ron Bloom, Anita Dunn, Cass Sunstein, Mark Lloyd, Jeff Jones (who wrote Obama's stimulus, omnibus and Obamacare legislation) and Obama himself. Quoted in their own writings and interviews, and videotaped public appearances.
How can anyone possibly write that off as "paranoid conspiracy theory"?

These are their own words, their own stated goals and implemented policies.

3) the "vast conspiracy" between Leftists and Muslim radicals is also supported by the undisputed actions of William Ayers, Code Pink, SEIU and other leftist groups organizing demonstrators and riots throughout the Ärab Spring" Middle East nations that are rising up.

Beck explains, again, with sources to back it up, that leftists and Islamic radicals are working together in their shared goal of overthrowing Western capitalism, and will eventually turn on each other once they achieve collapse of the West.
(Ten years ago, prior to 9-11, I spoke to a CBS News correspondent who after his speaking appearance and booksigning, talked to me about islamic terrorist groups collaborating with Ku Klux Klan and other similar anti-semitic groups, sharing information and resources, in their shared anti-semitism goals. I would hope that patriotism after 9-11 would have caused them to sever those ties with Islamic terrorists.)




If it's a troll who has no interest in any serious political discussion, and is just out to get under my skin (like rex), okay, in that case I see your point.

But Pro just alleged a bunch of bogus crap (i.e., "everybody hates you, G-man, Iggy, everybody") and I just politely pointed out the inaccuracies in what he alleged.

If anyone was truly ripe for being trolled, it's Pro, because he regularly becomes apoplectic when exchanging posts with me.
Pro hysterically whines "WHY CAN'T YOU BELIEVE WHAT I BELIEVE!! YOU"RE CRAZY!! YOU'RE INSANE!! YOU'RE DEMENTED AND IN NEED OF PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SEE THAT REPUBLICANS ARE EVIL!! WHY CAN'T YOU BE NEUTRAL AND OBJECTIVE LIKE ME AND SEE THAT REPUBLICANS ARE WRONG, ATTACKING OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE OF THEIR RIGHT WING EXTREMISM, BECAUSE THEY JUST CAN'T HANDLE THAT THERE'S A NIGGER IN THE WHITE HOUSE!! But I'm neutral and objective, and you're a right-wing crazy."

Of course there's nothing extreme or non-objective about Pro's views.






Okay, sure. I'll own up to that. We all get a bit overheated at times. And I certainly lash back sometimes, especially when they gang up on me and I'm taking it from all sides.
But read back through my exchanges over the last month or so with Pro, or Sammitch, or Rex, or Bastard. Try and tell me that their responses are really any different than mine.

The only difference is the standard I'm held to, that they're not.

Summarize,please.

If my calm and polite response to the issues raised can fairly be described as

WEINER'S FIFTH SEXTING PARTNER REVEALED

Another story I saw on Fox is Twitter posts by Congressional members have declined by 27% since the Weiner sexting story broke.



And a site has transcribed a number of Weiner's online sexting conversations with the Vegas woman and others.

And although the facts are not fully known and disclosed, Weiner apparently had online communication with an under-age 17 year old girl:

Exclusive: Police Investigate Weiner's Messages to Teenage Girl in Delaware

Nothing you do is ever calm or polite. You're the biggest name caller on the internet.

Only a matter of time now. Pelosi and Wasserman-Schultz have called for Weiner to resign. Whether they just waited until they saw which way the wind was blowing or they are getting out ahead of a bombshell, he is pretty much doomed.

As for the under-aged girl, this could be the bombshell or it could really be as innocent as he said. We'll just have to wait and find out. Still, he may have saved himself a lot more public scrutiny and may have been able to salvage his career if he--at least--thought of how private messaging a seventeen year old could be perceived.

Honestly, though I never really agreed with him on the issues, I liked Anthony. He was--at least--entertaining and seemed to have a real passion for what he was doing. So, it is a little sad to watch it all crash and burn like this.

The rehab move is definitely the ploy of a desperate man.

Next stop, reality tv.

Or MSNBC commentator

That's what I thought he said.

http://www.indecisionforever.com/2011/06/09/a-star-is-born-the-david-vitter-anthony-weiner-version/

Normally I'd say


But given that you're the the most anti-social piece of work on these boards, I'll instead say:










Oh, the irony.

I win again.

Reports say Hillary and Huma are expected back today. Even if you don't like him, pray for this man's health and well-being today. Oh, but to be a fly on the wall in that meeting.

Weiner will resign: New York Rep. Anthony Weiner has decided to resign his seat in Congress after a two-week scandal spawned by lewd and even X-rated photos the New York lawmaker took of himself and sent online to numerous women, relieved Democratic officials said Thursday.

Apparently, the National Enquirer's front page tomorrow will be a pic of him posing in tights and a bra. That may have had something to do with today's decision.

No doubt.

His wife, who has been out of the country since before this story first broke, arrived home yesterday from an overseas trip with Hillary Clinton.
And I'm sure it was quite a conversation she and The Weiner had when she arrived home. I've seen reports that he wanted to talk with his wife before making the decision to resign.

"It's odd that Obama thinks RepWeiner should resign, but not [Syrian President] Assad," former State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley tweeted earlier this week. "Sending lewd tweets violates public service, but not killing people?"

Today's NY Post has coverage of the resignation announcement:

• Howard Stern staffer Benji Bronk shouted, "Are you fully erect?"
  When others tried to stifle Bronk, he argued, "Don't you want to know? I want to know."
  Then he tossed another question at Weiner, "Are you more than seven inches?"

Pornstar Ginger Lee's press conference was interesting:


Porn Actress: Weiner Asked me to lie [press conference with Gloria Allred]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQMgOsZHrlg



She said Weiner in her Twitter communication "tried to take the conversation in a sexual direction" which she made clear by her unresponsive silence she did not want.

A pornstar was disgusted by Weiner's attempts at dirty talk!

She also says he gave her prepared statements and wanted her to lie to cover for him, which --even with her lack of political experience-- she knew would just make things worse.

Odd bulge in Weiner tax form:

• Anthony Weiner likes to do things big -- especially when it comes to his tax deductions.
  
  The disgraced former congressman's 2010 tax return shows he took $40,521 in unspecified itemized deductions on an income of $156,117.
  
  "It's definitely a very large deduction," said Manhattan CPA Jonathan Medows.
  
  He said the deductions appeared to include more than the standard writeoffs for state and local taxes and Weiner's mortgage.
  
  Weiner's campaign finance reports list his Forest Hills home as the address of his campaign committee, even though the committee rents office space in midtown Manhattan.
  
  A spokesman for Weiner, who resigned Thursday in the wake of a sexting scandal, refused to provide any details about the return.

She's made other videos that were more interesting.

http://www.spankwire.com/search/straight/keyword/ginger%20lee

Anthony Weiner Press Conference: Resignation, met with heckles (06.16.11)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeM_6DHHg4U



Weiner's resignation speech 8 days ago was surreal, and still fun to watch in its unintentional comedy.

The air he tried to project was that of a statesman resigning to be New York mayor, or Governor, rather than a guy who sexted and e-mailed his penis all over the internet to mostly unresponsive young women.

The one thing I regret over Weiner's departure is an end to two weeks of some outstandingly great late-night comedy.

You're obsessed with wiener.

Just having fun, Rex.
The fact that annoys you just makes it even more so.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/09/anthony-weiner-inspired-condoms-on-sale/

Dena Anne Weiner


A Weiner I'd like to meet!

You need professional help.

Aw c'mon, rex. Who are you kidding?
Me and every political cartoonist, newspaper, tv station, and photo-shopper in America?
To a poll saying that 46% of America who felt media coverage was less than Rep. Weiner's antics warranted? (and no doubt would have gotten more coverage, if the offender were a Republican)

Bernard Goldberg's commentary at the time Weiner finally admitted to the nude photos and sexting is right on the money, about how reluctant the media was to report the story, and just to treat it dismissively, until his confession forced them to treat Weiner more critically.

Many MANY articles were written speculating that Weiner would survive the crisis and stay in office. In contrast to national opinion (over 60%) who said Weiner should leave, and against the opinion at the end of Reid, Pelosi, Obama and (very ironically) Bill Clinton, urging Weiner to leave.



I also love the sarcasm with which O'Reilly and Goldberg speculate "Oh, gee, now that the media knows the full facts, I'm sure they'll fully vindicate Breitbart and other conservatives who investigated this story from the beginning."

We all know otherwise.

Sex-scandal strikes the Democrat party twice in 5 weeks, with the resignation of Rep. David Wu (D-Oregon).

The liberal media reports it as resifgnation because of "unwanted sexual advances", and it takes some considerable reading to determine just what the heck that means.
Apparently, it means he sexually harassed and/or had non-consensual sex with an 18-year-old girl who is the daughter of one of his longtime friends and campaign contributers.



http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/07/david-wu-sex-scandal-/1

• Rep. David Wu, an Oregon Democrat facing an ethics investigation for allegedly having an unwanted sexual encounter with a young woman, said today he will resign from Congress.
  
  Wu, the first Chinese-American member of Congress, said he is stepping down so he can take care of his two children as he fights these "very serious allegations."
  
  Yesterday, Wu reportedly told his friend Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., that he did "nothing illegal" and believes he will be "vindicated." Wu, who did not deny he had an encounter with the young woman, conceded he exercised poor judgment.
  
  
  The Oregonian reported Friday that a young woman left a distraught message with Wu's Portland office accusing him of what the newspaper described as "aggressive and unwanted sexual behavior." The woman, who was 18 at the time of the incident, is the daughter of one of Wu's longtime friends, who is a campaign contributor.
  
  
  Rep. David Wu, D-Ore., says he'll resign from Congress.
  
  Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., formally asked Monday for an ethics investigation into the allegations made against Wu, first elected in 1998 and currently in his seventh term.
  
  Wu had initially said he would not seek re-election next year. He said today he'll leave once Congress and President Obama resolve an impasse over raising the nation's $14.3 trillion in borrowing authority.
  
  "The time has come to hand on the privilege of high office," Wu said in a statement. "I cannot care for my family the way I wish while serving in Congress and fighting these very serious allegations."
  
  Pelosi, in a statement today, said Wu's decision "is a recognition of his need to focus on his children and their future. The timing of his decision is in the best interests of his constituents."
  
  Larson of Connecticut, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and one of Wu's closest friends, spoke with the embattled congressman yesterday and shared some of the discussion with reporters for The Oregonian and other news outlets.
  
  "He said this was weighing heavy on his mind, and he hadn't made up his mind. He was obviously quite troubled by the whole thing and insisting that when everything comes out, 'I'll be vindicated,' " Larson said, according to the Portland newspaper. "I told him, 'Dave, there are no good answers to this.' "
  
  Even before the allegations from the young woman had surfaced, Wu had attracted unwanted attention and headlines.
  
  The Oregonian reported in February that Wu's staff had demanded the congressman seek psychiatric treatment because members were concerned about his sometimes erratic behavior. Wu reportedly would sometimes be loud and angry and behaved inappropriately on the campaign trail, the newspaper reported.
  
  Among other things, Wu e-mailed a photo of himself wearing a tiger costume. The congressman appeared on ABC after The Oregonian's story was published, apologized for his behavior and said he was on medication and getting treatment for undisclosed mental health issues.
  
  He is going through a divorce.
  
  Wu's decision to resign and the ethics investigation represent a dramatic fall for the lawmaker, who was born in Taiwan. Wu graduated from Stanford, briefly attended medical school at Harvard and earned a law degree at Yale. He clerked for a federal judge in Portland and ended up making his home there.
  
  While in Congress, he has developed a mostly centrist voting record but stuck with the Democratic Party on education, health care, abortion and gun control, according to the Almanac of American Politics.
  
  Wu had drawn two Democratic primary opponents before the sex scandal broke: Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian and state Rep. Brad Witt. The 1st Congressional District, centered in Portland, is solidly Democratic and gave President Obama 61% of its vote in 2008.
  
  

video from ABC News

To me, he's just not David Wu without the cat suit!



http://i.imgur.com/NhAs1.jpg

And the hits just keep on comin' :



http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/02/nj-pol-resigns-after-nude-photos-appear-online/

• MAGAZZU (D-NJ) RESIGNS AFTER E-MAILED NUDE PHOTOS MADE PUBLIC
  
  
  TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A politician who emailed a woman nude photos of himself that were later posted on a GOP activist’s website announced his resignation Tuesday and said he’ll consider all legal options to have the pictures taken down.
  
  In an emailed statement, Cumberland County freeholder Louis Magazzu apologized to his friends, family and constituents but indicated that he thought he was being set up.
  
  The 53-year-old Democratic lawyer, who’d been an elected county official since 1997, said he sent the photos to a woman with whom he corresponded online for several years and that she requested the photos. At least two of the photos revealed his crotch, two photos showed him fully dressed in a suit and a fifth showed him from the waist up, shirtless.
  
  “I did not know that she was working with an avowed political enemy to distribute these pictures,” he said. “I have retained counsel to determine what laws may have been broken by the unauthorized distribution of those pictures.”
  
  The pictures appear to show Magazzu standing naked in front of a mirror photographing himself with a Blackberry — photos similar to those that led U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York to resign in June. The seven-term Democratic congressman acknowledged sending sexually explicit messages and photos to several women online.
  
  Unlike Weiner, who waited weeks amid the intense controversy before resigning, Magazzu stepped down a day after the scandal hit local newspapers.
  
  Magazzu has five children but said he’s been separated from his wife for about two years. His attorney, Rocco Cipparone, said the pictures were sent sometime around January.
  
  “Unfortunately, in my personal life, I did not always demonstrate the wisdom and balance that I expected from myself, and that the people of Cumberland County deserve and have every right to expect,” Magazzu said.
  
  The man who posted the photos last month, Carl B. Johnson of Millville, told The Associated Press that he was happy Magazzu was leaving office and that he would consider taking down the photos.
  
  “He should have stepped down a long time ago for many reasons. His brand of politics is harmful to the entire political process,” Johnson said, adding: “I’m sorry it had to happen this way.”
  
  Johnson said he started his website three years ago after a dispute with Magazzu over claims about property taxes. Johnson decided to post the photos because Magazzu had brought up Johnson’s family and back child support payments during their squabble, he said.
  
  “I started the blog three years ago after a nasty freeholder meeting … it started as a way to expose the dirty underbelly of Cumberland County politics,” Johnson said. “No one did anything in the party without him having his say.”
  
  Johnson said on his website that the woman “contacted me out of the blue this year.” He said he told her to contact the media, and when none seemed interested, he “reluctantly revealed them.”
  
  Cipparone, Magazzu’s attorney, said they are looking into whether Johnson violated criminal and civil privacy laws by posting the photos and sending uncensored copies to local newspapers.
  
  “He is the victim of unauthorized, nonconsensual dissemination of these photos,” Cipparone said. “While his sending images may be considered indiscreet, it was a private communication intended for one other person only.”
  
  Democrats offered mixed reactions about the photos, with fellow freeholder director William Whelan calling for Magazzu to resign and Cumberland County Democratic Party co-chairman Doug Long saying the pictures were private and shouldn’t have a bearing on Magazzu’s political life.
  
  “Personally, I don’t think it’s unethical at all,” Long said. “He didn’t lie or try to hurt anybody, and it didn’t affect his ability as a freeholder.”

At least he had the decency to resign quickly. Unlike Weiner.

And in typical Democrat fashion, he and his lawyer blamed the messenger, and acted like Magazzu did nothing wrong, and to file whatever trumped-up charges he could against the messenger.

WEINER HAS PRESS CONFERENCE WITH HIS WIFE, REVEALS HE CONTINUED SEXTING EVEN AFTER HE RESIGNED IN 2011



Weiner is the gift that just keeps on giving!

The peter tweeter strikes again!

And...

ANTHONY WEINER IS STILL A PERVERT (AND HERE ARE THE PICTURES TO PROVE IT)




Kind of a snappy headline.



Almost as good as:

And the peter Tweeter's got his dice in a vice now!

She is better looking than he is.

She's really got his balls in a blender now!

I f you know what we mean.

And I think you do.

I don't.

But that's fine. 'Cuz I don't care.

Sorry. I'm temporarily out of crude metaphors.

The same photo, revisited:

Nope. Same person.

tat's Pauly Shore

A weiner's growing problems http://www.katu.com/news/national/Weiner-faces-growing-calls-to-quit-mayors-race-216814491.html

Ha... Weiner faces...

She definitely is.


http://robt.shepherd.tripod.com/huma-abedin.jpg







http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/fashion/daily/2013/07/24/24-huma.o.jpg/a_4x-horizontal.jpg





And you'd think a guy who looks like Weiner, who is the weasel that he is, who already got busted on the national stage and lost his Congressional seat because he was sexting to 22 year old women about their photos, and Twittering his penis all over the internet. Somehow after all that, she didn't toss him out 2 years ago... and he does it again?
This guy should be thanking God every day he has this lady, and instead he's hosing it away with anonymous women on the internet.

I suspect if he drops out of his current Mayor bid and he has exhausted any political capital he had left, she will quietly file for divorce shortly after. She is, of course, Hillary Clinton's aide and protege, and is ingrained with no shortage of ambition, that Weiner is certainly no longer capable of living up to.

I also like her photoshopped as a blonde.




Nice legs, but I doubt they're actually hers.

"Carlos Danger" would be a great RKMB alt.

As you note, she is a protege of the Hildebeast. The idea of standing by her politician man while he commits sexual indiscretions is part of her job training.

It probably doesn't hurt that it takes attention away from rumors she's Hillary's dyke toy and a Muslim sleeper agent (note I said rumors).

I've heard previously that Hillary is a lesbian.
But I hadn't heard till now that her dykery included our girl Huma.

I used to work with an orthopedic surgeon who started his career in the airforce, and he told me that he knew a Marine who went on to be assigned to Air Force One in the Clinton years, who had said with certainty that Hillary is a lesbian.

The muslim sleeper agent rumor would seem to contradict the lesbian girl-toy scenario. But there are plenty of other muslim radicals appointed in the Obama administration, eager to sell out America and put their balls in a blender for Allah.



Regarding Huma standing by her man The Weiner, I agree that she would follow Hillary's lead in that strategy, SO LONG AS WEINER HAS POLITICAL CAPITAL, as William Jefferson What's-his-name did.
But I suspect Weiner has blown it for the last time, and has outlived his usefulness.
In any case Weiner deserves the very worst, whatever happens. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if Huma cuts him loose, after a discreet interval of time.

She is clearly a humasexual

TO DESTROY THEIR SHARED TEXTS, WEINER OFFERED HIS 22-YEAR OLD SEXT GIRLFRIEND A JOB AND AN APARTMENT



And when he says "I'm very sorry, " he really means "I'm very sorry I got caught."


Huma should be exceptionally ticked off. 2 years ago, Weiner was just sexting messages and photos.
In this round, Weiner promised her an apartment where the two could meet for ACTUAL sexual liasons, not just internet. One of the text messages says that quite clearly.

Plus he offered to get her a job at Politico. I wonder whether Politico was flying cover for Weiner before this broke.

Plus increased calls for Weiner's withdrawal as a candidate for mayor.

• Embattled Anthony Weiner Begs Voters: Stick by Me

Not surprising: direct or indirect calls for Weiner to withdraw by the other mayor candidates.

Surprising: similar calls from the N Y Daily News, and N Y Times.

Cue MEM claiming that the use of the alias "Carlos Danger" was actually Weiner's outreach to Hispanics.



Yeah. A friend of mine who worked in a law firm that had ties to the DNC said pretty much the same thing. A secret service agent made a similar disclosure to my dad during a fishing trip.

And the Huma rumors go back to at least 2007.

Again, not saying I believe Huma's a dyke. Just reporting that some do.



Well, as noted above, I'm not saying I believe it. However, she'd hardly be the first hard liner (of any religious faith) to be a secret homosexual (cue MEM bringing up Larry Craig and trying to derail the thread).

And what better way to assuage fears of radical Islamiscim (sp?) than marrying a Jew?

I'd actually thought it very odd that Huma (a self-identified Muslim) would marry a jewish Anthony Weiner. If she was a non-practicing Muslim and more of a secularist despite coming from a muslim background, it would be more explainable.

And your alternate speculation that she could be pretending to be more secular or moderate than she truly is, to gain power to advance an islamic jihad. (the Koranic, "fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)" that any deceit in the name of Jihad serves Allah, and all that. )

Or, y'know, maybe she's just a rug-muncher.




Huh huh.

You guys are so vicious and catty!

Weiner’s sext partner says wife Huma Abedin is in it for power and fame: Anthony Weiner’s cyber mistress says he fakes it — with his wife. “It almost feels to me like it’s more of an arrangement, or a business relationship, than a marriage,” Sydney Leathers said of the perv pol and his humiliated spouse, Huma Abedin.

As we've discussed above, that all may be true.

That being said, how is a girl who is trying to make a name for herself as a politician's "other woman" any different?

In addition, I don't see why Leather's view of the matter carries any weight. She's hardly the first woman in history to have a married man tell her "my wife doesn't understand me" or "we're in a loveless marriage" in order to get some extracurricular nookie.

This article seems an indictment of her and Weiner more than Abedin.

Hey, vicious is my word!


And really, there are plenty of people attacking Huma's self-serving conflict of interest and abuse of priveleges of her office as corrupt, if not outright treasonous, for it to be dismissed as "vicious and catty".



HUMA ABEDIN'S FAMILIAL TIES TO TERRORISM EXTEND BEYOND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

HUMA ABEDIN-WEINER'S LONG LIST OF TIES TO RADICAL ISLAM AND MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

And most recently, Senator Grassley's investigations into Huma's conflict of interest, in her continuing to work part time in the U.S. State Department (under Frau Hitlery), while reaping huge consulting fees from private groups outside government, essentially selling out confidential government information that betrays her government position and inside secrets of the State Dept.



SENATOR GRASSLEY CALLS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF HUMA ABEDIN'S MONEY FROM CONSULTING

Would the Clintons be so sneaky as to talk Weiner into running, make sure a pretty liberal activist exposes new tweets to embarrass him and Huma and then use Huma's status as a "wronged woman" for sympathy, thereby innoculating her against possible conflict of interest as a consult?

Probably not. Of course that is more or less how Hillary got herself a Senate seat.

Weiner's campaign chief reportedly quits as scandal grows

• Anthony Weiner’s already limp mayoral campaign suffered another huge blow yesterday, when his campaign manager reportedly abandoned the sinking ship.
  
  Danny Kedem quit as Weiner’s campaign point man following a disastrous week on the trail, the New York Times reported this morning.
  
  With Kedem out of the already shrunken ...staff, the longshot City Hall bid appeared to be floundering.
  
  A campaign spokeswoman would not confirm or deny the report.
  
  Weiner stood firm despite his travails yesterday, spending much of the day in his apartment shooting a campaign ad.

Clinton has proven herself many times over and if she only got things out of sympathy your party wouldn't be worried about her so much. She'll make a wonderful President if she decides to run again.

I live in NY. You don't. I got to see the first hand coverage (live debates, etc.) of her initial Senate run. A lot of things one would think would have gotten more in a Senatorial race would either downplayed or ignored because of a certain post-Monica sympathy towards Hillary.

Student of Saul Alinsky. Wrote her thesis on Saul Alinsky.

Lifetime far-Left radical.

Her negligence and treason in Benghazi. A year later, still no explanation, and Hitlery's continued evading of the truth.

As secretary of state, oversaw the collapse of U.S. influence in the Middle East, and assisted Obama in betraying our allies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Czech Republic, Poland and Israel.


Looking the other way regarding scandals among her own state dept. staff.

There's plenty more, but really, what else needs to be said? Except that if the Obama/DNC-subservient media were doing their jobs, her career would already be over.

So the usual accusations from the far right. I think that's another plus for Clinton, she's has had decades of dealling with that and has still managed to cross the aisle and work with the other party.

Funny. But, they clearly never watched the show. Everyone knows Butthead sat on the viewers left and Beavis was on the viewers right. Duh!

This alone should disqualify Hillary Clinton from any further office.



Rand Paul Destroys Hillary Over Benghazi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jriU_cPU9Vk

And especially:


Clinton on talking points "What differnce at this point does it make?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFZytEUCXu4


For all her posturing about "What difference does it make..." and posturing about the greater priority of making sure it never happens again, she did absolutely nothing to PREVENT it happening again, she personally obstructed investigation, repeatedly fronted a false Benghazi narrative, to this day --a year later-- has made no arrests or reprisals, and just tried to sweep the corpses of some of America's finest (who had the courage to act and save lives when she would not) under a rug, in the pursuit of her own self-interest.

The undisputed facts are not "the usual accusations of the far right", they are simply the facts.

Weiner goes limp: falls to fourth in new mayoral poll

I'm amazed Weiner has only fallen to fourth place, and still retains 16%.

But then again, 11 or 12% of the population thinks Elvis is still alive...



WEINER APPEARS TO HAVE SEXTED HIMSELF OUT OF THE N.Y. MAYOR RACE

Although I like your headline better, G-man.

Is it too late for Weiner to straighten himself out?

Why am I not surprised that a thread with "Weiner" in the subject line has gotten so much attention from WB and G-man?

Yeah. So much attention, from just me, G-man... and every news channel and late-night comedian in America.

Predictably, Weiner finished badly in the NY mayor primary.

ANTHONY WEINER CAPS FAILED COMEBACK WITH OBSCENE GESTURE


God forbid Weiner should finish with the slightest shred of class or dignity.

To borrow from a Washington Times headline, the Wiener continues to wither.

I just wonder who this 5% is who still supported for the guy, after everything he's done.

Hillary to Huma: Dump Weiner or you’re out

Poor Huma:

I'm just waiting for Weiner's Shane Vendrell moment.

Good God:



Does anyone really buy this?
The fact that the article opens with Hillary insisting that Huma dump Carlos Danger or leave the island makes clear that she plans a presidential bid.

She's just trying to stay below radar as long as possible, because the longer she waits to announce her 2016 run, the longer she is safe from political attacks that can bring down her candidacy.

A British press piece on Gennifer Flowers, mentioning Bill Clinton, Hillary, The Weiner and wife Huma:

• EXCLUSIVE: TWO DECADES AFTER HER AFFAIR WIH BILL CLINTON, GENNIFER FLOWERS REVEALS THEY'D BE TOGETHER IF NOT FOR CHELSEA, AND HOW THE FORMER PRESIDENT CONFIDED IN HER THAT HILLARY IS BISEXUAL
• Flowers's 12-year affair with Bill Clinton was exposed in 1992 during his presidential campaign
• She bitterly regrets rejecting him when he last begged to see her and says he's the 'love of her life'
• Launching a career as a sex columnist she says Clinton taught her everything she knows
• Bill told her Hillary was 'bisexual' and that he had 'no problem with that'

On the Clintons' lying nature (BOTH of them) :





On her affair of many years with Bill Clinton, and her new venture as a sex advice columnist:



I think Bill will be hitting that again!
The runway lights are showing the way, and the radio tower is guiding him in.


And Hillary and Huma's carpet-munching tendencies...




Just the Weiner being the Weiner.
But the mainstream media in the U.S. doesn't want to touch the Huma/Hillary relationship story, and potentially hurt her campaign.

Even as they are eager and going 24/7 all-Christie-scandal-all-the- time, with no direct link proven to Christie himself.

One might think, y'know, they were propping up Hillary (despite evidence they selectively omit) and tearing down Christie (without evidence).
But hey, what am I thinking, there's no history of that, IS there?

The nudie pics of Gennifer Flowers with the article are just the icing on the cake. At the time the story broke, Flowers was as beautiful a woman as you could imagine. It's not hard to see where Bill (who was banging every girl in sight anyway) was tempted and took the bait.

Huma Abedin announced she will divorce Anthony Weiner over his latest online sexting.


Gee, who saw that one coming?

coming. heh.

Weiner is now alone with his weiner.

Even when it's over, it's not over:

WEINER MAY WRITE TELL-ALL BOOK ABOUT HOUMA AND THE CLINTONS, IF DIVORCE SETTLEMENT DOESN'T GO HIS WAY




"Zero truth to this", says Weiner. Until he actually does it.

He has such an outstanding record with telling the truth. (i.e., only telling it when someone is about to release a cache of incriminating penis photos of him, that proves the lie of what he is fronting.)

They shouldn't be worrying about his ability to land a new job. He can be a pornstar. He's already got his pornstar name.

That won't work either, because as I cited earlier regarding The Weiner's former chat buddy Ginger Lee, even pornstars are disgusted by Weiner's behavior!

( Warning: image not safe for work: )



Maybe he could be a spokesperson for Twitter, Snapchat, or Tinder. I can picture his ads for Tinder : "Finally a site so focused on getting right down to sex, even I'm accepted and not found disgusting!"

Whoa, hey, dude. How about a spoiler tag? Some of us don't expect the dirty stuff outside the women's forum.

Oopsie.

As explicit as EVERYTHING is related to this story, I thought it didn't matter.
But I bow to your wisdom and made the correction to the above image in question.



And since Weiner is back in the news, and you took the time to start another topic on the subject:

Weiner gets schlonged: Will plead guilty to sexting minor

As G-man posted, the Weiner has been released.


Prospects for 2020:

.

(Something pointing out you're hypocritically fantasizing about gay shit.)

.

Or more accurately, just a funny meme.

.