Random yahoo on article posted by .Mic: "Proud of all who are marching today!!! We must fight back because we all matter!!!!"

Me: Oh. so now all lives matter...huh?

Articles from libprop sites on Facebook have been fun. Here is an exchange from this morning...

I don't condone bragging about being able to commit sexual assault either.

This guy does

You guys have accused him of all sorts of things but bragging about being able to commit sexual assaul is a new one. Can't even imagine WB using the "everyone talks like that" line to defend a Clinton in that hypothetical.

It's really a case of you not wanting to admit the Russians helped your party win the election and what that means. They recognize Trump for what he is and what he'll accomplish for them.

You can review what you guys were saying when the Russian hacked emails were being dribbled out at the tail end of the election. Along with the FBI inserting itself into the election to help Trump I watched a big Clinton lead dwindle down to a couple of points. Your logic that stuff like a gossipy Podesta emails has to be either enough to lose the popular vote or had no effect honestly seems dumb.

Keep blaming everyone but your flawed candidate and her flawed campaign. The fact of the matter is that even Bill knew she was screwing up but no one would listen to him.

• As it became clear on Tuesday night that Mrs. Clinton would lose to Donald J. Trump, supporters cast blame on everything from the news media to the F.B.I. director’s dogged pursuit of Mrs. Clinton over her personal emails, and to a deep discomfort with electing a woman as president.
  
  But as the dust settled, Democrats recognized two central problems of Mrs. Clinton’s flawed candidacy: Her decades in Washington and the paid speeches she delivered to financial institutions left her unable to tap into the anti-establishment and anti-Wall Street rage.
  
  And she ceded the white working-class voters who backed Mr. Clinton in 1992. Though she would never have won this demographic, her husband insisted that her campaign aides do more to try to cut into Mr. Trump’s support with these voters. They declined, reasoning that she was better off targeting college-educated suburban voters by hitting Mr. Trump on his temperament.
  
  Instead, they targeted the emerging electorate of young, Latino and African-American voters who catapulted Mr. Obama to victory twice, expecting, mistakenly, that this coalition would support her in nearly the same numbers. They did not.
  
  Early on, Mr. Clinton had pleaded with Robby Mook, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, to do more outreach with working-class white and rural voters. But his advice fell on deaf ears.

Another false narrative you are deceitfully trying to front. There is no evidence to support this.
The intelligence evidence is that even the Russians thought Trump would lose, and that the best they (the Russians) could do is undermine her credibility as an elected president. They DIDN'T plan on Trump winning. PERIOD.

Further, the evidence is that WikiLeaks obtained the self incriminating e-mails of Hillary, Podesta, Wasserman (Bitch-Cunt) Schultz and other DNC officials through DNC officials, **NOT** from the Russians, as Julian Assange has said himself.
Such as the suspiciously murdered Seth Rich, who arguably the Hillary campaign had killed to silence.

Obama didn't produce the intel but was briefed on it. You believe the guy who brags about being able to sexually assault women and obvious lies about crowd sizes. You don't have to tell me who you believe

Trump has a lifetime of being that person who brags about being able to commit sexual assault. Even with having everyone who works for him signing non-disclosure there are plenty of stories. That one was just on tape and therefore harder for you to ignore. Your comment about yes men is laughable considering that's exactly what Trump is doing.

You guys will never stop this will you? You're seriously planning on dancing to this tune of "Your guy is stupid cuz of this!" And then go back and forth with nuh uh and yeah huh until you all die...or the boards do. Every now and then I peek in here and see if it's any different. Nope. Same crap. Every single election. All you all do is switch sides in the same room.

I didn't just say "Did not" "Did too."
I cited sources and facts to counter M E M' s liberal-partisan propaganda. I haven't even been here for 2 days, and just responded and debunked, as raised, the liberal talking points he was fronting.

By Marc A. Thiessen,The Washington Post Writers Group
October 16, 2018, 3:35 PM


Donald Trump may be remembered as the most honest president in modern American history. Don’t get me wrong, Trump lies all the time. He said that he “enacted the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history” (actually they are the eighth-largest) and that “our economy is the strongest it’s ever been in the history of our country” (which may one day be true, but not yet). In part, it’s a New York thing — everything is the biggest and the best.

But when it comes to the real barometer of presidential truthfulness — keeping his promises — Trump is a paragon of honesty. For better or worse, since taking office, Trump has done exactly what he promised he would do.


Trump kept his promise to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, something his three immediate predecessors also promised yet failed to do. He promised to “crush and destroy ISIS,” and two years later he is on the verge of eliminating Islamic State’s physical caliphate. He promised to impose a travel ban on countries that he saw as posing a terrorist threat, and after several false starts the final version of his ban was upheld by the Supreme Court.

Trump pledged to nominate Supreme Court justices “in the mold of Justice (Antonin) Scalia,” and now Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh sit on the high court. Trump also pledged to fill the federal appellate courts with young, conservative judges, and so far the Senate has confirmed 29 — more than any recent president at this point in his administration.

Trump promised to cancel President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan, withdraw from the Paris climate accord, approve the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, and open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploration. He fulfilled all of those pledges.

On trade, he kept his promise to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and impose tariffs on steel and aluminum. He also committed to renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement — and recently signed new deals with Mexico, Canada and South Korea. He committed to imposing tariffs on China to force it to open its markets and stop its theft of intellectual property — and is following through on that pledge. Whatever one thinks of Trump’s trade policies, he is doing exactly what he said.

Where Trump has failed to keep promises, such as building the wall or repealing Obamacare, it has not been for a lack of trying. Only in a few rare instances has he backtracked on a campaign pledge — such as when he admitted that he was wrong to promise a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan and reversed course. I’m glad he did.


But whether one agrees or disagrees is not the point. When Trump says he will do something, you can take it to the bank. Yes, he takes liberties with the truth. But unlike his predecessor, he did not pass his signature legislative achievement on the basis of a lie (“If you like your health care plan, you can keep it”) — which is clearly worse than falsely bragging that your tax cut is the biggest ever.

The fact is, in his first two years, Trump has compiled a remarkable record of presidential promise-keeping. He’d probably say it’s the best in history — which may or may not end up being true. It’s too soon to tell.

_______________________________________________

Marc A. Thiessen writes for The Washington Post. He is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former chief speechwriter for President George W. Bush.

Keep blaming everyone but your flawed candidate