RKMBs Forums .::Important::. Politics and Current Events Do Race and Gender Matter anymore?

It's an interesting but flawed essay. It's glaring flaw is the fact that the attitude she speaks of is found in younger voters BUT the vast majority of the electorate is still made up of old set in their ways fogeys.



Still, it'll piss Wonder Boy off.

Why would it piss me off?

I myself would have voted for Colin Powell, if he had chosen to run for office in 1992, 1996 or 2000.
I have a very favorable opinion of Clarence Thomas, J.C. Watts, Alan Keyes, Andrew Young and many other politically, academically and otherwise accomplished black Americans.

My only reservation with minorities, or liberals, or women pursuing careers, or white conservatives for that matter, is when they act in a way that is unpatriotic, and against the best interests of the United States.

So your remarks are quickly revealed to be yet another slander of yours, to paint me as a "racist in pursuit of a white-only America", that my many posts over more than 6 years here quickly reveals to be a false assertion.

Unlike your slanderous malevolence, which is plainly on display for all here.

The article's facts didn't piss me off, the deliberate slander by Whomod did.

My opinions are what I actually say, not what you "script" me to say.

I'm glad we clarified that then.

So now you have no problem with women in nontraditional roles and with homosexuals?

Since when did you care about facts?

How is that the article's 'glaring flaw' when that is the very point of the article? The part at the end that you made boldy-bold and stand-outty clearly states that the question of electing a black or woman president is becoming superficial specifically to young voters. It doesn't say that it's a trend across the board.

I have a problem with women in non-traditional roles when they neglect their children to pursue their careers, and when they cease having children at replacement-population levels at all.

I read an article recently that millions of women in the last decade have started stay-at-home businesses, so they can have a career and still be around to raise and be with their children.

The two options for women (careers, and traditional motherhood) aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. But liberal feminism teaches a view that "housewife" and "stay-at-home mom", are pejoratives.
And even view "marriage" as slavery.

Liberalism, as envisioned by Gramsci and the Frankfurt School of marxists (from which 60's liberalism has directly sprung from) want nothing less than the abolishment of families, christianity, and democracy itself, to be replaced by a socialist ideology and state.
Liberals see their political views as a benign movement, but they don't see the end result that their marxist leaders envision. Liberal teachings of environmentalism and overpopulation, and material secularism, discourage having children.

As I've said many times, a human race, a civilization, that chooses not to reproduce and continue itself, is morally sick and on a path toward self-destruction.
Within 40 years, Western civilization will be overwhelmed by foreign immigration and cease to exist. In Europe, they will replace their democracy with an islamic government. In the U.S., it will be a welfare state overwhelmed with Mexicans and central Americans, that resembles the governments, corruption, high taxes and class extremes of Cental American and South Americans states.

This is the fruit of radical feminism and other allied liberal corruptions of the United States.



I like and socialize with gay people, as individual friends and co-workers. I took my girlfriend to a New Years Eve party, where a good percentage of the people there were gay, and I enjoyed talking to everyone there.

But the larger gay community, as a political movement, is part of the movement to strangle all reference to our national origins from Christianity, is part of the liberalism that encourages globalism, encourages excessive guilt over past racism that seeks to undermine will to be patriotic and defend our nation, that advocates removal of the Ten Commandments and all other Christian references from our government and schools, that advocates declaring private free practice of Christian teachings that homosexuality is immoral to be a "hate-crime" (as they already have in Canada), and that otherwise silences Christian political ability to advocate the issues important to them, as every other political group in the U.S. has the right to.
To do this, gay activists, in collaboration with other secularist liberals, abuse and misrepresent "separation of church and state" and utilize fear tactics to suppress Christian political representation, and our Christian heritage.

I guess I see it as a flaw because it paints a too hopeful note when Gen Y voters, although larger this time around, still aern't enough to make an overall difference IMO. It's a hopeful sign is all and if anything, it may sway some races ever so slightly, but it isn't some sweeping trendas you pointed out.

I wish monkeys could vote!

If you cared about the truth, you'd acknowledge I've stated the sourced facts across multiple topics.


But then why should I expect you to acknowledge the truth, when you're nothing but a...

..troll, trying to sling some mud.

Ha! Trolls have funny hair!

If they're just partisan liberals who are voting for the same corporate lobby interests that dominate both parties, by buying into partisan propaganda that whites/Republicans are evil, even as their Democrat alternatives use-race-baiting, gender-baiting victim politics, and then represent the same corporate interests that export jobs, import cheap foreign labor, and push us toward open borders and an economic union with Mexico and Canada, how is that a "hopeful sign"?

You're gloating about a liberal victory, that is in truth a corporate victory, against U.S. sovereignty and economic stability.

I agree with this article.

see, you're pissed off. whomod was right.

It's horrible when people do what they think is right as opposed to what's right for national intrest.

I shouldn't pick on you WB, your opinions suck, but at least you are sincere and sane.

That's hypocritical, considering how you sided with Pariah and his sophistry.

Personally to me race & gender don't matter. It's a cool side factor that I'm probably going to vote for somebody who isn't the traditional white male candidate though.

so free will and how they choose to live their lives should come after some baby-making quota? you do realize the population has gone up 2 or 3 times in just the last 30 years.
And I ask you if this is really about having babies and not about keeping women subservient in the home, why don't you advocate stay at home fathers?


You act like it's some sort of secret conspiracy. It's just a different view in terms of what options are available in life. Women have only had the option to actually live a life of their own choosing for 30 or so years. Men have always had the right to do whatever they please, it smacks of insecurity to be so fearful of change.





wow. you're so fucking crazy and so fucking wrong. Liberals want people to have freedom in their lives. Ultimately Liberalism is more towards the aim of free will, a gift from God (or Allah). One could argue that conservatives trying to impose their views and "morals" on to others violates the free will that God (or Allah) gave humanity.

And overpopulation is bad. Look at what happens when you cram too many people together. You get disease, you get pollution, you get poverty.


how many kids do you have?

But we're all humans. Why does it matter where those demographics come from? Unless this is an issue of race for you, you should be more relaxed about the fact that humanity has gone up by the billions since 1950.
And if this is another Mexican thing, well Mexico is part of Western Civilization.


so basically this is a race war for you, right? more white people to stop the evil invaders?



wow. I bet some girl with a Jimmy Carter button turned you down for a date once and you've just been burning with hatred ever since.


we're talking about gay people now?


wow. you like gay people but you want it to be taught that they're sinners? somehow the gays are responsible for the removal of ten commandments, and not the fact that the constitution requires a church/state separation and as time goes on your little fairy tales belief become less and less important.
And no one is silencing christians. for god sakes you have the president as a hardcore "boner for jesus" type. Your message is out there, most people just don't take it seriously. you're talking about morality tales from a 2000 year old story book that also condones slavery and advocates stoning someone for working on the sabbath.
and you also have to consider that most christian political types are like you, talking about the love of christ and how much you hate liberals in the same sentence. if you don't even follow the teachings of peace and forgiveness how do you expect to sway anyone.

but what about the caucasians Ray, what about the caucasians?

9/11 was caused by some feminists looking to knock down those two penis shaped towers.
you go girl!