Colorado Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert issued an apology after she and a male companion were escorted out of a Denver theater's production of the "Beetlejuice" musical for causing a disturbance on Sunday.
The apology came a day after surveillance video emerged that showed Boebert vaping at her seat in the theater. Her campaign earlier denied the theater’s contention that she had been vaping. The disturbance involved laughing, singing, recording and vaping, according to a report released earlier this week.
In a Friday evening Facebook post, Boebert acknowledged the "unwanted attention" she received following her appearance at the venue and insisted that her words and actions that night had not been meant to be "malicious" or to "cause harm."
"The past few days have been difficult and humbling, and I'm truly sorry for the unwanted attention my Sunday evening in Denver has brought to the community," Boebert wrote. "While none of my actions or words as a private citizen that night were intended to be malicious or meant to cause harm, the reality is they did and I regret that."
"There's no perfect blueprint for going through a public and difficult divorce, which over the past few months has made for a challenging personal time for me and my entire family. I've tried to handle it with strength and grace as best I can, but I simply fell short of my values on Sunday. That's unacceptable and I'm sorry," she continued.
The Republican lawmaker also said she "genuinely" did not recall vaping during the performance.
"Whether it was the excitement of seeing a much-anticipated production or the natural anxiety of being in a new environment, I genuinely did not recall vaping that evening when I discussed the night's events with my campaign team while confirming my enthusiasm for the musical," she added. "Regardless of my belief, it's clear now that was not accurate; it was not my or my campaign's intention to mislead, but we do understand the nature of how this looks. We know we will have to work to earn your trust back and it may not happen overnight, but we will do it."
Offering appreciation for those who had supported her in recent days, Boebert, who represents Colorado's 3rd Congressional District, said she had "learned some humbling lessons these past few days" and vowed to move forward while making her constituents "proud."
The Denver Post reported that in an incident shared with the publication Tuesday, two patrons at a performance of the touring Broadway show had been asked to leave the Buell Theatre, which is owned by the City of Denver.
The pair were reportedly given warnings during intermission that there had been three complaints from attendees.
Five minutes into the second act, security reportedly received another complaint about the patrons "being loud and at the time (they) were recording," which is prohibited at shows.
One of the ushers, the publication said, was quoted as saying, "They told me they would not leave. I told them that they need to leave the theater and if they do not, they will be trespassing. The patrons said they would not leave. I told them I would (be) going to get Denver Police. They said go get them."
While Boebert and the other patron were not identified in the report, the congresswoman confirmed on X, formerly known as Twitter, that she was "guilty."
"It’s true, I did thoroughly enjoy the AMAZING Beetlejuice at the Buell Theatre and I plead guilty to laughing and singing too loud," she posted. "Everyone should go see it if you get the chance this week, and please let me know how it ends!"
Boebert’s campaign manager, Drew Sexton, also told The Post at the time that Boebert denied vaping, though she did take a photo of the performance with her cellphone, claiming that she had not known that photos were not permitted.
And way at the very end of this Fox News article...
Quote
According to the report, the two patrons were escorted out and resisted leaving, saying things like, "Do you know who I am?" "I am on the board," and "I will be contacting the mayor."
Footage from the venue was released after the incident took place and showed Boebert vaping and blowing vapor into the air. Other footage shared across social media appeared to show Boebert and the male patron touching each other inappropriately during the show.
Other footage appeared to show Boebert flipping off those who ushered her out of the theater.
Interesting how that was not discussed, and then tossed in there in one sentence at the very end.
Needless to say, liberal media is giving far more focus to that last "inappropriate touching" section.
But, y'know, if Boehbert were a Democrat U.S. Representative doing the exact same thing, or were a transexual man in drag, giving lapdances to elementary school children at some bookreading event, that would be no big deal in the liberal media, and would get minimal coverage. That said, Boebert is impossible to defend on this one, having created a disturbance in multiple ways in a public theatre, where patrons were no doubt paying top dollar to even be there. And it didn't help that she wasn't honest about it, and then got busted with the video that forced her to tell the truth.
That last part of being a highly visible government official misbehaving publicly, and then not expecting to get called on it, is vaguely reminiscent of Rep. Anthony Weiner posting his penis pics all over the internet and sexting women online, and also trying to hook up with under-age girls, and as a highly visible public figure, Weiner not expecting to get caught or have anyone notice. There are certain things anyone with common sense doesn't do as a public figure.
So the end result of her bad behavior for you is a partisan attack on the media. Sexually groping a date at a kids show but at least neither were in drag I guess, lol. Pretty fucked up values imho
“ On Saturday, however, CNN released audio recordings of Trump on Howard Stern’s radio show in 2005 in which the billionaire admitted to going through the changing rooms of the beauty pageants he owned. “Well, I’ll tell you the funniest is that before a show, I’ll go backstage and everyone’s getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” Trump said during the interview. “You know, I’m inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good.” “And you see these incredible looking women, and so, I sort of get away with things like that,” he added. Three of the four women who claimed that Trump walked through their changing room at the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant asked to remain anonymous. The fourth, former Miss Vermont Teen USA Mariah Billado, says she remembered Trump saying as he walked in, “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before.” She also remembers telling Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, a co-host at the time, about the incident. “Yeah, he does that,” Ivanka responded.”
I think Boebert will be okay with her conservative voters.
So the end result of her bad behavior for you is a partisan attack on the media. Sexually groping a date at a kids show but at least neither were in drag I guess, lol. Pretty fucked up values imho
Originally Posted by WHAT WB ACTUALLY SAID
But, y'know, if Boehbert were a Democrat U.S. Representative doing the exact same thing, or were a transexual man in drag, giving lapdances to elementary school children at some bookreading event, that would be no big deal in the liberal media, and would get minimal coverage. That said, Boebert is impossible to defend on this one, having created a disturbance in multiple ways in a public theatre, where patrons were no doubt paying top dollar to even be there. And it didn't help that she wasn't honest about it, and then got busted with the video that forced her to tell the truth.
I said her behavior was impossible to defend. PERIOD.
I only additionally said that if Boebert were a Democrat, her fellow Dems and the liberal media would find a way to defend the indefensible, by either directly excusing it, by accussing the Republicans of "weaponizing" it just by calling her on it (portraying her as a victim, for her own actions), or by the liberal media's most-used tactic of selective omission of even mentioning it, as they often do for the UNDENIABLE FACTS regarding the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens and for so many other Democrat scandals that you only see covered in conservative media, despite how abundantly evidenced as true.
And you pretty much proved my point, that male pedophiles in drag doing lapdances for children doesn't even register on your radar,. But OH! OHHHH!, Lauren Boebert fondling her date in the audience, sitting in the dark, while everyone is watching the stage where the only light is, is somehow a crime worse than gassing 6 million Jews, worse than pedophelia, and worse than Joe and Hunter Biden's abundantly proven treason.
I clearly said Boebert's actions are indefensible. Not the worst actions in the above contrasted actual crimes, but indefensible on their own. I only said that Democrats and the media would excuse the same actions, if Boebert were a Democrat. That multiple recent past examples prove that. And listed several sexually scandalized Democrats that you don't even see any shame in.
I could add Paul Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, and the other Democrat congresswoman who had a threesome with one of her congressional aides and her husband (and the aide said in a reported text that the relationship emotionally damaged her). And the congrssswoman similarly (as is the Democrat pattern) blamed Republicans just for exposing the relationship and nude photos THAT SHE TOOK AND POSTED HERSELF in her text messages. But Republicans are responsible for, in her Bizarro logic. Barney Frank. Jeffrey Epstein. Harvey Weinstein. Gerry Studds.
The list is really endless, of Democrats who don't take responsibility for their own actions. It's always the Republicans' fault for simply acknowledging the facts and condemning or ridiculing Dems' actions for doing it.
I give some slight credit to Boebert for apologizing and taking responsibility for her own actions that night, although she initially tried to deny it, and finally did apologize when the video showed she actually did vape, make disruptive noise, and maybe grope her male date inside the play auditorium. But that apology is more than any of the Democrats I listed ever gave, in the same indefensible situation.
Thank you for proving me right, that Democrats excuse and ignore the same actions from Democrats. Portraying Boebert fondling her date as the ultimate evil, while not even acknowledging Democrat pedophile transgender freaks fondling kids, as the slightest bit worthy of notice or condemnation.
“ On Saturday, however, CNN released audio recordings of Trump on Howard Stern’s radio show in 2005 in which the billionaire admitted to going through the changing rooms of the beauty pageants he owned. “Well, I’ll tell you the funniest is that before a show, I’ll go backstage and everyone’s getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” Trump said during the interview. “You know, I’m inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good.” “And you see these incredible looking women, and so, I sort of get away with things like that,” he added. Three of the four women who claimed that Trump walked through their changing room at the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant asked to remain anonymous. The fourth, former Miss Vermont Teen USA Mariah Billado, says she remembered Trump saying as he walked in, “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before.” She also remembers telling Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, a co-host at the time, about the incident. “Yeah, he does that,” Ivanka responded.”
I think Boebert will be okay with her conservative voters.
Trump was a judge, one of the officials in the beauty contest. All he did was walk through the dressing room, where one girl perceived Trump as taking too long a look at her. He didn't grope anyone or commit any crime. We've been over this a billion times during the 2016 election.
What a desperate grope at moral equivalency, to exaggerate Trump as having done something wrong. FOUR of the four women are no doubt Democrats, who when asked said "Trump has to be stopped", by whatever slander they could manufacture. I doubt any of these models has reservations about undressing in front of men or anyone else, unless it is Trump, who they can manufacture allegations against for political reasons. And BY THE WEIRDEST COINCIDENCE, all these women came forward right before election day 2016, some of them silent for years or even decades, but all of a sudden came out of nowhere with allegations to destroy Trump's presidential candidacy. All Democrat accuser women, many of them using those exact words, "Trump has to be stopped." Just as they did against Clarence Thomas. Just as they did against Herman Cain. Just as they did Judge Roy Moore. Just as they did to Brett Kavanaugh. A pretty consistent recent dirty tactic by Democrats, to slander Republican candidates out of the running, with humiliating and viciously untrue sexual allegations.
I was just reading this article on the Juanita Broadrick story, and the consistent pattern of sexual abuse/rape by Bill Clinton, that can be confirmed by officials investigating, going back to Clinton's college years.
Women have been charging Bill Clinton with sexual assault since his days as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford 30 years ago.
A continuing investigation into the President's questionable sexual history reveal incidents that go back as far as Clinton's college days, with more than a dozen women claiming his sexual appetites leave little room for the word ''no.''
Juanita Broaddrick, an Arkansas nursing home operator, told NBC's Lisa Myers five weeks ago she was raped by Clinton. NBC shelved the interview, saying they were confirming all parts of the story, but finally aired it Wednesday night.
Broaddrick finally took her story to The Wall Street Journal, which published her account of the brutal rape at the hands of the future President, followed by The Washington Post and some other publications.
But Capitol Hill Blue has confirmed that Broaddrick's story is only one account of many attempted and actual sexual assaults by Clinton that go back 30 years. Among the other incidents:
Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. A retired State Department employee, who asked not to be identified, confirmed that he spoke with the family of the girl and filed a report with his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's family declined to pursue the case.
In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident. The woman, tracked down by Capitol Hill Blue last week, confirmed the incident, but declined to discuss it further and would not give permission to use her name.
In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident.
Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident, but declined to go on the record with her account. Several former students at the University have confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students.
Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton's gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape.
From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually. One retired state trooper said in an interview that the common joke among those assigned to protect Clinton was "who's next?". One former state trooper said other troopers would often escort women to the governor's hotel room after political events, often more than one an evening.
Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met then-governor Clinton at a political fundraiser and shortly thereafter received an invitation to meet the governor in his hotel room. "I was escorted there by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room."
Elizabeth Ward, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown. [But] Last year, Ward, who is now married with the last name of Gracen (from her first marriage), told an interviewer she did have sex with Clinton but said it was consensual. Close friends of Ward, however, say she still maintains privately that Clinton forced himself on her.
Paula Corbin, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with [Corbin-]Jones recently with an $850,000 cash payment.
Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser says Presidential candidate-to-be Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation's capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She says she screamed loud enough for the Arkansas State Trooper stationed outside the hotel suite to bang on the door and ask if everything was all right, at which point Clinton released her and she fled the room. When she reported the incident to her boss, he advised her to keep her mouth shut if she wanted to keep working. Miss James has since married and left Washington. Reached at her home last week, the former Miss James said she later learned that other women suffered the same fate at Clinton's hands when he was in Washington during his Presidential run.
Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton's leased campaign plane in 1992, says Presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself to her, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.
Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, reported that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993. Willey, who told her story in a 60 Minutes interview, became a target of a White House-directed smear campaign after she went public.
In an interview with Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young English woman who said Clinton raped her in 1969.
''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was the last I heard of it.''
Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she would not go public with further details of the attack. Afterwards, she changed her phone number and hired a barrister who warned a reporter to stay away from his client.
In his book, Unlimited Access, former FBI agent Gary Aldrich reported that Clinton left Oxford University for a "European Tour" in 1969 and was told by University officials that he was no longer welcome there. Aldrich said Clinton's academic record at Oxford was lackluster. Clinton later accepted a scholarship for Yale Law School and did not complete his studies at Oxford.
The State Department official who investigated the incident said Clinton's interests appeared to be drinking, drugs and sex, not studies.
"I came away from the incident with the clear impression that this was a young man who was there to party, not study," he said.
Oxford officials refused comment. The State Department also refused to comment on the incident. A Freedom of Information request filed by Capitol Hill Blue failed to turn up any records of the incident.
Capitol Hill Blue also spoke with the former Miss James, the Washington fundraiser who confirmed the encounter with Clinton at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, but first said she would not appear publicly because anyone who does so is destroyed by the Clinton White House.
''My husband and children deserve better than that,'' she said when first contacted two weeks ago. After reading the Broaddrick story Friday, however, she called back and gave permission to use her maiden name, but said she had no intention of pursuing the matter.
"I wasn't raped, but I was trapped in a hotel room for a brief moment by a boorish man," she said. "I got away. He tried calling me several times after that, but I didn't take his phone calls. Then he stopped. I guess he moved on."
But Miss James also retreated from public view this week after other news organizations contacted her.
The former Miss Moffet, the legal secretary who says Clinton tried to force her into oral sex in 1979, has since married and left the state. She says that when she told her boyfriend, who was a lawyer and supporter of Clinton, about the incident, he told her to keep her mouth shut.
"He said that people who crossed the governor usually regretted it and that if I knew what was good for me I'd forget that it ever happened," she said. "I haven't forgotten it. You don't forget crude men like that."
Like two other women, the former Miss Moffet declined further interviews. A neighbor said she had received threatening phone calls.
The other encounters were confirmed with more than 30 interviews with retired Arkansas state employees, former state troopers and former Yale and University of Arkansas students. Like others, they refused to go public because of fears of retaliation from the Clinton White House.
Likewise, the mainstream media has shied away from the Broaddrick story. Initially, only The Drudge Report and other Internet news sites have actively pursued it. Since initial publication of this story, a few mainstream media outlets have expressed interest in interviewing the women.
The White House did not return calls for comment. White House attorney David Kendall has issued a public denial of the Broaddrick rape.
And consistently, as with maximum coverage of Rep. Mark Foley(R-FL), vs. minimum coverage of Rep. Gerry Studds (D-MA), as with maximum coverage of UNproven allegations about Republican candidate Herman Cain, vs. reluctance of the same media at the exact same time to report on Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY), as with the media leaping at the most specious allegations against John McCain in 2008, vs. the reluctance of the media to investigate low-hanging fruit on Obama that is even self-incriminatingly discussed by Obama in his own autobiography... in ALL these cases, the media leaps at any malicious rumor about a Republican and gives it maximum coverage, whereas with a Democrat they feel a need to wait and confirm.
Journalistic integrity for the liberal media is, apparently, sensitive to whether you're investigating Democrats you like, or Republicans you don't like.
Back to you raging against the media when it doesn’t act like an arm for the gop. It’s always the same thing when a republican has a scandal for you.
Citing linked facts is not "rage".
And when EVER did the "Media act like an arm of the GOP"? The media is over the last 50-plus years quantifiably liberal, and that is from the polls where liberals overwhelmingly describe themselves as either "liberal" or "very liberal" at a consistent ratio of 80% or more.
And increasingly since 2008-forward, there are multiple polls that show media reporters as 90% to 93% liberal, or on several events, 100% liberal in their OBVIOUSLY biased coverage, of Obama vs. McCain, of Obama vs. Romney, of Trump in the 2016 campaign, and during Trump's two impeachments and other manufactured scandals.
And, of course, the extensive examples cited by Sharyl Attkisson, on the unashamed bias of liberal journalists throughout the 2020 election, where they unashamedly say it is their holy mission to destroy Trump, and prop up the Democrats.
55 minutes of sourced and quoted articles, of fanatical and shameless liberal media bias. Akin to Soviet or Maoist or Jacobinist zeal, in their one-sided propaganda for the liberal/Leftist cause.
The conservative press does act like a propaganda arm for your party. Conservatives are fine with bias if it’s what they want to hear. Boebert’s scandal for example is being covered differently by Fox News than if she had been a democrat. There would have been a more sensational headline, more coverage and the stuff they buried at the bottom would have been in the first paragraph. I think they didn’t even do a story until she apologized did they?
The conservative press does act like a propaganda arm for your party. Conservatives are fine with bias if it’s what they want to hear. Boebert’s scandal for example is being covered differently by Fox News than if she had been a democrat. There would have been a more sensational headline, more coverage and the stuff they buried at the bottom would have been in the first paragraph. I think they didn’t even do a story until she apologized did they?
Propaganda is the liberal media saying "Donald Trump incited an insurrection on Jan 6 2021," with nothing to back it up, AND SUPPRESSING THE FACTS AND THE VIDEO OF WHAT TRUMP ACTUALLY SAID, as the liberal media did for months, to sell a deliberately false narrative and to fly cover for Biden and the Democrats. Conservatives didn't cover that with "bias". They presented the hard (and largely suppressed) FACTS that proved Trump's innocence.
The liberal media (including Google, Facebook and Youtube) even suppressed Trump's Jan 6 2021 speech virtually everywhere online, so that no one could even verify what Trump ACTUALLY SAID that day. To verify for themselves if Trump actually did "incite" an "insurrection" that day. Trump DID NOT "incite" a riot, or insurrection or whatever. That was all just liberal media narrative. Deliberate misrepresentation and suppression of the true facts.
CONSERVATIVE media allowed you to see in a tiny sliver of media coverage what the truth was. In truth, Trump issued an executive order for up to 20,000 troops to be deployed around the Capitol on Jan 6th, to PREVENT any possible riot or civil unrest. Pelosi, Schumer, and DC mayor Muriel Bowser PREVENTED those troops from being deployed. THEY caused the riot on January 6th. Trump throughout the day on Jan 6th, first in his 70-minute speech, and then at least twice an hour all afternoon on social media on Jan 6th, over and over instructed his supporters to "remain peaceful", and respect the police on Jan 6th.
Within about 90 minutes of when a small group of protesters about 2:30 PM broke into the Capitol, Trump urged his supporters to refrain from violence. And really, those committing the violence and vandalism were in truth not Trump supporters. By FBI's own admission (Jill Sanborn, Chris Wray, in Senate testimony) "at least 20" undercover FBI agents D*I*S*G*U*I*S*E*D as Trump supporters were placed in the crowd. Neither Sanborn or Wray would answer if these undercover agents encouraged violence, led violence, or committed violence themselves. Only saying "Senator, I can' answer that." Plus the "at least 20" agents DHS admitted they also sent undercover into the crowd, D*I*S*G*U*I*S*E*D as Trump supporters. Plus at least 10 DC Metro officersalso admits they sent undercover into the crowd on Jan 6th, disguised as Trump supporters. And at least 20 John Earle Sullivan-led Antifa also in the crowd, proven in their own video openly gloating about framing Trump supporters, D*I*S*G*U*I*S*E*D as Trump supporters Totalling at least 70 anti-Trump agents disguised as Trump supporters, who could easily be all of the 60 who were involved in vandalism and violence that day, out of "well over 100,000 " PEACEFUL protesters that day, according to the estimate of police who monitor large protest crowds in Washington DC every single day..
We know all of that now because of Conservative media, who reported the FACTS that mainstream/liberal media suppressed and deliberately misrepresented, conservative media who often faced threats and federal and leftist intimidation for doing so, just for reporting the true facts.
And further reporting the facts that exposed the false narrative of "five people KILLED that day by white racist Trump supporters". In fact there were Z*E*R*O people killed that day by Trump supporters. Officer Brian Sicknick (HIMSELF a Trump supporter, who wrote his congressman in protest to the first Trump impeachment a year earlier in Jan 2020) died of a stroke., according to the coroner's report, and according to his own brother 2 days after Jan 6th. THIS WAS KNOWN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, but the liberal media buried it in a false narrative. I POSTED a link to this coroners's report that also quoted Sicknick's brother, a few weeks after the fact. But Sicknick's actual cause of death by stroke was deliberately buried in an ocean of liberal Democrat-Bolshevik propaganda, idespie that the coroner and Sicknick's brother reavealed the true facts were reported only 2 days after the event, suppressed by the New York Times and liberal media, in favor of a self-serving false narrative by the Democrat party, New York Times, and other liberal Newspeak media.
The others who died, one man in his 50's of a heart attack, another man in his 50's of a stroke, a third 34 year old Trump supporter who died of unclear causes, but died during CPR and had health problems, and 35 year old Air Force veteran Ashlee Babbitt who was shot by Capitol police Lieutenant Byrd for no reason, ALL WERE TRUMP SUPPORTERS, N*O*T killed by Trump supporters. There are also reports by investigative reporters, of Capitol police firing concussion grenades over and over into crowds of PEACEFUL protesters, and some investigators have argued this trauma of being repeatedly hit with concussion grenades could have killed these three, since they had previous medically diagnosed fragile health before they ever arrived to protest
I've seen no evidence that the Trump supporters, whether peaceful or rioters, were ever proven to be "white supremacist" or "insurrectionist". As I've sourced often, Jill Sanborn, the FBI assistant director of counter terrorism, grudgingly acknowledged in Senate questioning THAT THERE WAS NOT ONE FIREARM confiscated in or around Washington Square that day. How exactly do you have an "insurrection", white supremacist or otherwise, without any weapons?!? Another liberal media false narrative, FACTUALLY disproven by FBI investivative reports, and by FBI leadership's Senate testimony under oath.
These are just a few of the myriad lies told by the liberal media, that conservative media, far from being propaganda, disproved with THE FACTS. Documented and undeniable. From officials, and from the FBI's own investigative reports.
On the subject of Lauren Boebert, I laughed because in this case the article I linked from Fox News was like a liberal media report, where liberal media hype something sensational in the headline, and buried in the final paragraphs of an article (that most don't read, beyond the headline) is the part they don't want to tell you. The true facts are there, but few people read to the last paragraph. But regardless, Fox News did report it, but I laughed at the shift in emphasis as compared to the liberal media's version. I don't know if Boebert was "fondling" her male companion or if that is a lurid distortion of the mainstream media. But certainly, the mainstream media focused on the most lurid and sensational allegations, whereas Fox News arguably focused on the part that could be proven.
As for your saying "I think they [conservative media] didn’t even do a story until she apologized", conservative media was definitely covering this all along, but to my knowledge Newsmax and Fox both covered the theatre's video surveillance as it was revealed, 3 days later, and Boebert's apology did not occur until today. And as I said, even with Fox's coverage of Boebert's apology, it's nice that she apologized, but it still looks bad that she tried to deny it until the video of her disruptive behavior surfaced, so regardless, her behavior that night remains indefensible. And Fox and Newsmax pulled no punches in reporting that today. And even made a few jokes about it at Boebert's expense. For what it's worth, she did apologize and take responsibility.
Compare that to, say Senator Dick Durbin, who said in 2004 of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, comparing them to "Soviet Gulags, Nazi storm troopers, and the Pol Pot regime". When Durbin was called on his remarks on PBS News Hour in 2004 and in other interviews, he said then, and says to this day, he "was taken out of context". No, he clearly said it, and never apologized. Even 20 years later. While Boebert's admission and apology had to be pushed, at least she did apologize. Whereas Durbin and many Democrats never have. Being a Democrat with the media completely on your side, means never having to say you're sorry.
Another example is Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, when an Antifa member shot up an ICE compound, screaming rhetoric identical to that of A O-C and Kamala Harris and dozens of other Democrats, before the Antifa shooter was shot dead. She has been asked by dozens of reporters about the fact that he was screaming words identical to hers, and she never apologizes, never even acknowledges the question. Nor do any of them. I guess that's "right wing media propaganda" too.
“Fox News Digital covered the initial incident and reported on Boebert’s subsequent apology almost a week on Friday. “Boebert ‘truly sorry’ after causing disturbance at Denver theatre that was caught on video,” read the somewhat euphemistic headline on the second article.“
So yeah Fox News did cover this story differently because she’s a Republican with just a story on Fox News Digital initially for almost a week.
I liked Fetterman’s jab at both…. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) took a jab at Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) while responding to Fox News’s coverage of the Senate’s updated dress code, calling out the Colorado lawmaker over her recent removal from a musical performance. “I figure if I take up vaping and grabbing the hog during a live musical, they’ll make me a hero,” Fetterman wrote Tuesday
“Fox News Digital covered the initial incident and reported on Boebert’s subsequent apology almost a week on Friday. “Boebert ‘truly sorry’ after causing disturbance at Denver theatre that was caught on video,” read the somewhat euphemistic headline on the second article.“
So yeah Fox News did cover this story differently because she’s a Republican with just a story on Fox News Digital initially for almost a week.
I liked Fetterman’s jab at both…. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) took a jab at Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) while responding to Fox News’s coverage of the Senate’s updated dress code, calling out the Colorado lawmaker over her recent removal from a musical performance. “I figure if I take up vaping and grabbing the hog during a live musical, they’ll make me a hero,” Fetterman wrote Tuesday
You can just water Fetterman twice a day, and move him close to the window for better photosynthesis. He's a vegetable, a potted plant, and nothing he says, including his one-liners, are not prepared for him by the staffers who move his puppet-strings.
Regarding Lauren Boebert, how was she treated differently by Fox News? PROVE THIS ! I've abundantly demonstrated with examples how Democrat/liberal news media treats Republicans different than Democrats, some with Democrats and Republicans simultaneously having energing sex scandals, where they ignore the Democrat scandal, and give total air time to the Republican scandal. Herman Cain who got maximum coverage every 10 minutes for weeks, vs. the Anthony Weiner scandal that was fr more lurid AND PROVEN that the media tried to completely ignore. Rep. Mark Foley vs. Rep. Gerry Studds. I fail to see where you've made a case for "right wing media" allegedly giving Boebert a free pass. As I said, they grilled her pretty nicely on both Fox and Newsmax, beyond print media. They certainly didn't ignore it and sweep it under the rug. And that video came out really quick of Boebert in the theatre, as compared to, say, Paul Pelosi's video with his homeless gay sex buddy. Or the video of the gay/trans shooter who killed 5 people in a Nashville Tennessee christian school. And we **NEVER** saw that video released, of her gay/trans online manifesto (that by the way, seemed to gel perfectly with the wider army of trans freaks in the Antifa movement nationwide.)
Or Ashlee Babbit's shooter, Capitol police Lt. Michael Byrd, where every other cop involved in a death or shooting nationwide is usually revealed within the hour (Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, MO; or the four cops involved in George Floyd's death in Minneapolis, Minnesota, even though Floyd had twice the lethal dose of Fentanyl in his body, before the police ever even showed up.) The point being, OVER AND OVER, conservatives get maximum and immediate doxxing, whereas Democrats and dirty corrupt liberal cops get protected by Democrat officials and by the liberal media. FACT. PROVEN !
Man, Wondy conveniently forgot Carlos Danger when it suited his dumb narrative...
Carlos Danger = Rep. Anthony Weiner's (D-NY)'s online pseudonym for sexting and picking up teenage girls.
Anthony Weiner coverage I think just proves my point. That the simultaneous scandal with Herman Cain got maximum coverage by the liberal media,every 10 minutes for WEEKS,. And only with the greatest reluctance did the media give any coverage to the Weiner scandal. Despite that Herman Cain's allegedly coming on to a woman he helped (later also alleged by a 2nd woman he helped who came forward a day or two later when Herman Cain didn't immediately withdraw as a candidate, NEVER PROVEN, and conversely the women were both proven to be filing for bankruptcy, and financially motivated to make the allegations.
But AT THE EXACT SAME TIME, the media was reluctant to give coverage to the Weiner scandal, despite it being : 1) proven by Weiner's texts and multiple women publicly coming forward, 2) scorned as creepy and perverse by a pornstar who just wanted to talk politics with Weiner, and she found it creepy that he kept trying to turn the conversatiion sexual, DISGUSTING EVEN A PORN STAR! 3) Weiner was closely associated with the Clintons through wife Houma Abedin, 4) Weiner had top secret information on his laptop, clearly leaked to his and Huma's unsecured laptop that endangered national security, and 5) also self-incriminating photos and texts that proved he had liasons and attempted sexual hookups with under-age girls.
ALL that, and the liberal media wasn't even interested. The media gave virtually ALL their air coverage to Herman Cain's unproven allegations. But with the proven allegations against Weiner, they constantly said "We need to be responsible and review all the facts before we report about the Weiner story."
Media Research Center at the time counted stories, and demonstrated with hard numbers how coverage of Herman Cain's only-alleged wrongs, completely eclipsed coverage of the thoroughly PROVEN Weiner story.
Already showed that Fox News avoided mentioning the Boebert story on air for almost a week. Their entire coverage consisted of reporting the initial incident and then her apology only on their digital unit. So 2 reports you could read online but nothing on-air.
Already showed that Fox News avoided mentioning the Boebert story on air for almost a week. Their entire coverage consisted of reporting the initial incident and then her apology only on their digital unit. So 2 reports you could read online but nothing on-air.
What you allege (probably spun on liberal blogs) , vs. what I actually watched.
Fox covered the story immediately, on air. Some comedian (Jimmy Faila) interviewed on Fox about it joked that the tiitilating aspect would get Boebert "the pervert vote", from those who became familiar with Boebert only from scandal news coverage, whereas otherwise they never would have heard of her. So Fox did cover Boebert's scandal from the beginning, and even took a few shots at her. Likewise Jesse Watters, likewise Laura Ingraham. Pretty much on every Fox show I watched that day.
Yahoo News is essentially a liberal blog. The biases of that site are obvious, you might as well be linking Media Matters to "prove" your allegation that Fox didn't cover it.
AGAIIN: I watch Fox News every day, and I cited multiple persons on shows I watched THAT DAY who not only discussed it, but made fun of Lauren Boebert. See above. Did Fox gloat about it and dwell on it with as much partisan glee as CNN or MSNBC? Probably not. But Fox didn't hide it, and they didn't excuse her behavior. Period, the end.
I’m guessing you’re conflating later coverage in place of the next to nonexistent coverage early on. Yahoo News hasn’t had to pay out big bucks in settlements for its coverage btw.
I’m guessing you’re conflating later coverage in place of the next to nonexistent coverage early on. Yahoo News hasn’t had to pay out big bucks in settlements for its coverage btw.
Good God are you ridiculous.
Fox News DID cover it the first day, and they covered Boebert's rude behavior even more, after he theatre surveillance video was released.
As compared to Paul Pelosi's drunk-driving car accident where the video was NEVER released by loyal Democrats in the San Francisco police Department, and CNN and MSNBC never even raise any question about the incident, just try to sweep it under the rug. Likewise Paul Pelosi's gay antics with a homeless illegal immigrant male prostitute, where [Democrat partisan] police and [Democrat partisan] liberal media are very reluctant to release video or facts about he incident, or [Democrat partisan] reporters who will never ask Nancy Pelosi any questions about it. EVER.
Or Nancy and Paul Pelosi earning about $ 150 million on insider trading with confidential information she obtained as a member of House leadership. Never asked about it by the media, NEVER pressed repeatedly until she had to give an answer. Nohing.
Or how Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer obstructed the up to 20,000 National Guard troops President Trump ordered in Washington DC, well in advance, to guarantee order and no violence on January 6th 2021, during the rallies and the joint-session Congressional review of the electoral college votes inside he Capitol. And because of that obstruction, Pelosi and Schumer are the ones directly responsible for any rioting that occurred on January 6th. NEVER quesioned about this by reporers. NEVER. I think quite deliberately, just like the orchestrated police stand-down in Democrat-owned Charottesville, Virginia in Sept 2017, obstructing the National Guard Jan 6th deployment order by Pelosi and Schumer, precisely because Democrats WANTED violence to occur on January 6th, because it fit the narrative they (Pelosi, Schumer, the Democrats) wanted o sell. NO questions by the media of Pelosi,. NO exposure of these orchestrated failures. No exposure even by the January 6th committee, and certainly not the Democrat-lapdog media noting that lack of desposition testimony even requested of Pelosi or Schumer.. NONE.
But liberal media reaction to Rep. Lauren Boebert taking a date to a play, and vaping and making some disruptive noise, and maybe Boebert and her date fondling each other in the darkened auditorium, where only an infra-red security camera could see what they were doing... OH !!! OOHHHHH !!!!!!!!! That's SO much worse than the actual corruption and crimes and trillions in theft and wasteful spending by Democrats that endangers the country !
I know crimes and corruption by Democrats are invisible to you, and you just reflexively excuse it, no mater how much evidence there is. And all you can do is instead express infinite outrage at Republicans for far lesser offenses, or often completely made up offenses, in a [ corrupt Democrat-owned ] politically weaponized federal and state justice system. I wish you were even capable of opening your eyes and waking the fuck up. Facts in evidence, ABUNDANTLY, that you absolutely refuse to look at.
But hey, there is no Democrat corruption or deep state, right M E M? But if Biden were a Republican, he's be on trial for, oh, I don't know... 750 years in prison?
The FBI and DOJ are currently devoting 60% of their resources to "right wing white supremacist terrorists" that don't exist, when they should be investigating ACTUAL threats from islamic terrorists, criminal illegal immigrants, and... Joe Biden and other reported Democrats selling us out to enemy nations for tens of millions, money laundering, wire fraud, and tax evasion.
We are rapidly reaching the poin of another 9-11 attack on the U.S., precisely because Democrat agents are so busy weaponizing FBI, DOJ, NSA, CIA and other federal agencies, the threats they exist to protect us from will be able to kill a lot of people. Bu because they are Democrat-Bolsheviks who hate America, I guess the James Comeys, the Andrew McCabes, the Peter Strzoks, the Bruce Ohrs, the John Brennans, the James Clappers, the Lloyd Austins, the Mark Milleys, think we deserve to die anyway because, y'know.... equity, white privelege, 200 years of minority oppression and all that crap.
The people who hate America, ARE RUNNING America. We are in great danger. And you're on the side of he people who want to destroy us.
Yeah I see all the love you have for our country. I’ll never forget Jan 6 so rant and accuse all you want.
You're a programmed brainwashed zombie, immune to facts and logic.
January 6th was not at all what you've been programmed to believe it was. And you see it the way you do because you suck at the nipple of CNN, MSNBC, similar partisan liberal media, and liberal blogs. Whereas I watch channels and read articles that present the facts you absolutely refuse to absorb, even when told.
Such as: that Trump ordered 20,000 national guard troops, and Pelosi, Schumer, and mayor Bowser blocked ha deployment of troops that secure the Capitol. LIBERAL MEDIA THAT PRETENDS THAT FACT DOESN'T EXIST.
As did the lunatic Soviet-style "January 6th Special Committee". Who by the way, burned and hid their own investigation data reports. DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A SOURCE YOU SHOULD TRUST ?!?
Such as the fact that even the FBI acknowledges now there was no organized insurrection, just random tiny pockets of rioting, about 60 people out of the "over 100,000" (according to Washington DC police surveiling the crowds that day. THERE WAS NO "INSURRECTION". There was NOT ONE firearm confiscated anywhere in Washington square that day. How do you have an "insurrection" without any weapons? (SOURCE: FBI assisant director of couner-errorism Jill Sanborn, under oath in Senate hearings on the FBI's investigation. She refused to answer questions (under oath) about whether undercover FBI agents stoked the crowd, or whether FBI did the violence themselves. FACT.
And of the 60 involved in violence (as I've linked and documented repeatedly) there were "at least 20" undercover FBI agents disguised as Trump supporters (and possibly police removing barricades and directing protesters into the Capitol) and trying to stoke the protesters to violence, smashing windows, provoking the crowd. Which Trump supporters overwhelmingly resisted.
There were also (as I linked and posted) a further 20 DHS undercover agents disguised as Trump supporters in he crowd.
And as DC metro police finally revealed, a further 10 DC Metro officers were undercover disguised and posing as Trump supporters.
And these are just the ones DC metro, FBI and federal agencies have admitted so far. Just THE ONES WE KNOW OF !
So... evidence shows this was a false flag operation, staged to discredit Trump and his supporters. The evidence increasingly shows that. And by the way, it backfired. Who is leading in just about every poll now?
I'm just amazed how immune to facts and information you are, M E M. You're Democrat-Bolshevik to the core. You just won't believe the facts in front of you.
Oh bullshit WB. I watched Jan 6 and how Trump responded to events. The Jan 6 committee showed it was even uglier. I would have never voted for someone as conservative as Liz Cheney or Pence but they put country before loyalty to Trump. And there is the federal case now. And I don’t see Trumpers seeing it as a chance to bring into court all this proof that you repeat in rants. Nope, the hope is trying to get it dismissed.
Oh bullshit WB. I watched Jan 6 and how Trump responded to events. The Jan 6 committee showed it was even uglier. I would have never voted for someone as conservative as Liz Cheney or Pence but they put country before loyalty to Trump. And there is the federal case now. And I don’t see Trumpers seeing it as a chance to bring into court all this proof that you repeat in rants. Nope, the hope is trying to get it dismissed.
God, are you delusional. Believe what you want, a liberal blog version of January 6th events, polar opposite the truth. The January 6th committee was a clear one-sided cartoon of actual investigation, pure propaganda, Soviet-like in its proceedings, no cross examination of witnesses or evidence.
Liz Cheney and Mike Pence have self-serving political narratives, that have absolutely nothing to do with pursuit of Constitutional rule of law or the truth. Which is why Liz Cheney was ejected overwhelmingly from her House seat by Wyoming voters.
And Pence is pretty much dead last in the presidential primaries, because he is not trusted. Pence had a chance to do what was right on Jan 6th, to delay approving the electors, and ask each state to verify he legitimacy of the election results before finalizing the election count.
Even if you believe Biden won, the right hing to do was verify the results as legitimate for the half of the country who DIDN'T believe the election results., before finalizing the election. But instead, Pence betrayed the nation and did not send electors back to their states to review a CLEARLY rigged 2020 election in each of their states. Pence pounded the gavel to rubber-stamp a clearly rigged election, and in doing so he abdicated his responsibility and handed over the country to Biden and the Democrat-Bolsheviks and all the damage done since Jan 2021, meaning he has disqualified himself forever from higher office. The best scenario with Pence is that he is a naive dupe of the deep state who was misled. The worst scenario is that he sold out his party, and the nation, to have a seat at the table of power, acquired by any Bolshevik means. Pence was likewise a dupe of advisors pushing him to have Michael Flynn fired as national security advisor in Jan 2017. He was misled, and he misled President Trump to fire Flynn. If Trump had it to do again, I'm sure he would not have fired Flynn. Flynn was set up in a perjury rap sprung by Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok. They tried to do the same to K.T. McFarland (Flynn's deputy national security adviso) bu she had a better lawyer, who saw he frame for what i was. Whereas Flynn had law firm Perkins-Coie, the same ultra-Democrat dirty trickster law firm that orchestrated Hillary Clinton's "Russia Dossier", and against Flynn's best interests, tricked him into accepting a plea deal for a crime he did not commit.
Nope, to many hard right conservatives involved that paid a hard political price for doing the right thing for your propaganda to be rational. And now the country knows how far Trumpers will go to steal an election.
Nope, to many hard right conservatives involved that paid a hard political price for doing the right thing for your propaganda to be rational. And now the country knows how far Trumpers will go to steal an election.
That... makes no sense and says nothing factual.
Republicans who accepted the 2020 election results as "legitimate" were either intimidated by threats from Democrats there would be charges against them if they challenged the elecion's legitimacy (as is their Consiiutional right, to challenge and verify the result! )
Or they were dupes who were fooled into believing it was legiimate.
Or, Like Liz Cheney, Adam Kinsinger and Mike Pence, despite knowing it to be an illegitimate election, they schemed to be on the winning side and inflate their political fortunes within the GOP by kicking down Trump. Which politically backfired for them, and destroyed their political futures. Whereas the overwhelming majority of Republicans nationwide remain loyal to Trump, because it is SO OBVIOUS he was wronged, in the 2020 election, in the Mar A Lago raid, in the 5 or so (or is i 6? I lost count) simultaneous absurd indictments against him, like no other political leader, like no mobster, like no serial killer, like no genocidal war criminal, in legal history before him. NO ONE has ever been this persecuted by the American legal system. If you had an ounce of common sense, THAT ALONE would tell you the attacks on Trump are a vicious abuse of power, and not a legitimate case of him doing anything wrong.
I'd again like to take this as a moment to point out why I no longer feel compelled to take you seriously...
No, i's because you're a foul, mean-spirited and unhinged leftist wack job, who attacks me personallyjust because I don't believe what you do, who has sided with Democrats and vindictively slandered Republicans on every political issue discussed on these boards for... what now?... 15 years? You sided fanatically with Occupy Wall Street. You openly said you support Biden's open-borders policy. You openly hate Christians, and have openly boasted here on these boards that as a junior college professor, you discriminate against and harass your Christian students. You not only rail on and personally insult me here on these boards, but give the exact same treatment to ANYONE who expresses a conservative/Republican/pro-Trump point of view.
No one should take YOU seriously. You never express a factual case for anything, you just take profanity-laden personal shots at anyone who doesn't share your political views. For a least 13 years now, and counting. I think you completely lost your mind way back, with the Occupy Wall Street topic. That was... 2010? 2011? Over 13 years of you lashing back at myself and others who called you on your craziness. 13 years later, and you're still vindictively lashing out. Man, that's a lot of butthurt.
Yep, he just created some fiction there and stated it as fact.
Specifically what?
It's an absolute fact that Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger tried to exploit and capitalize on attacking Trump, along the lines of RINO John McCain's "maverick" self-branding .
It's an absolute fact that Mike Pence is similarly at the bottom in Republican primary support for the same reason. People don't believe him, they don't Trust him. Like myself, they see Pence, as a deep state agent, misled about his intentions leading up to the Jan 6th electoral vote count, for reasons not clearly explained by him dropping the ball on Jan 6 2021, and essentially throwing his conservative voter base to the Democrat-Bolshevik wolves. And as I laid out in a topic titled Biden's reign of terror began the moment Trump conceded the election, the Bolshevik Left shut down Trump's Facebook, Twitter and Instagram within hours of when he conceded that day, and then immediately began a purge of Republican conservatives from Pentagon military officer corps, from military contractors, and other government jobs, and then they did the same in other government agencies. FACT.
Then they did a second layer of purge by weaponizing mandatory Covid-vaccinations, to further remove anyone exhibiting conservative tendencies or independent thought. So they could replace them with cultural marxist lunatics, Iranian spies, and woke transgender virtue-sgnalling incompetents.
And the damage they have done in less than 3 years to the country is OBVIOUS, to anyone who isn't an indoctrinated leftist.
Cheney and the other republicans that didn’t go along with the Trump’s false narrative were the ones being honest when it was pretty clear it was going to cost them. I would never vote for someone like Cheney as she’s way to conservative. You stated as fact that she knew the election was illegitimate. There’s nothing there to suggest that. Unlike the list of republicans who know Trump is unfit but realize he controls the party and runs with whatever he wants she didn’t change her tune. Honor and putting country before Trump isn’t something tolerated in the gop now. I’m grateful to her and the others for their work that paved the way for the federal case against Trump.
I'd again like to take this as a moment to point out why I no longer feel compelled to take you seriously...
No, i's because you're a foul, mean-spirited and unhinged leftist wack job, who attacks me personallyjust because I don't believe what you do, who has sided with Democrats and vindictively slandered Republicans on every political issue discussed on these boards for... what now?... 15 years? You sided fanatically with Occupy Wall Street. You openly said you support Biden's open-borders policy. You openly hate Christians, and have openly boasted here on these boards that as a junior college professor, you discriminate against and harass your Christian students. You not only rail on and personally insult me here on these boards, but give the exact same treatment to ANYONE who expresses a conservative/Republican/pro-Trump point of view.
No one should take YOU seriously. You never express a factual case for anything, you just take profanity-laden personal shots at anyone who doesn't share your political views. For a least 13 years now, and counting. I think you completely lost your mind way back, with the Occupy Wall Street topic. That was... 2010? 2011? Over 13 years of you lashing back at myself and others who called you on your craziness. 13 years later, and you're still vindictively lashing out. Man, that's a lot of butthurt.
Pavlov couldn't have trained a frothier bitch than you. Good job depicting the literal definition of "a hit dog will holler."
I'd again like to take this as a moment to point out why I no longer feel compelled to take you seriously...
No, i's because you're a foul, mean-spirited and unhinged leftist wack job, who attacks me personally just because I don't believe what you do, who has sided with Democrats and vindictively slandered Republicans on every political issue discussed on these boards for... what now?... 15 years? You sided fanatically with Occupy Wall Street. You openly said you support Biden's open-borders policy. You openly hate Christians, and have openly boasted here on these boards that as a junior college professor, you discriminate against and harass your Christian students. You not only rail on and personally insult me here on these boards, but give the exact same treatment to ANYONE who expresses a conservative/Republican/pro-Trump point of view.
No one should take YOU seriously. You never express a factual case for anything, you just take profanity-laden personal shots at anyone who doesn't share your political views. For a least 13 years now, and counting. I think you completely lost your mind way back, with the Occupy Wall Street topic. That was... 2010? 2011? Over 13 years of you lashing back at myself and others who called you on your craziness. 13 years later, and you're still vindictively lashing out. Man, that's a lot of butthurt.
Pavlov couldn't have trained a frothier bitch than you. Good job depicting the literal definition of "a hit dog will holler."
Iggy again posts pure insults, no facts, just pure hate-filled unhinged crazy. And amid his hysteria, never realizes that HE HIMSELF is the frothy Pavlovian bitch he describes.
right wing media