Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Pariah Offline OP
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
WOW.

We are living under a dictatorial hive-mind.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Or you could be wrong and being a drama queen about it? Considering the GOP had nothing to replace it with and would have been held responsible for getting rid of the law, this was a gift for them too.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Pariah Offline OP
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Political gifts? That's all you care about?

It is not the role of the SCOTUS to infer their own meanings into law.

 Originally Posted By: Justice Scalia
“The Court forgets that ours is a government of laws and not of men. That means we are governed by the terms of our laws, not by the unenacted will of our lawmakers....

....The court holds that when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act says ‘Exchange established by the State’ it means ‘Exchange established by the State or the Federal Government,’ That is of course quite absurd, and the court’s 21 pages of explanation make it no less so.”


The SCOTUS has effectively told the people that they don't care whether or not the court would truly allow such a law; their only concern is seeing the law survive.

When Justice Roberts pulled this same shit three years ago, he told everyone that it wasn't the SCOTUSs responsibility to protect the people from their congress. Now he's saying their role is to outright favor the will of congress.

The reality of it is that he's just a corrupt piece of shit.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 24
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Offline
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 24
It is not the Federal Department. It is not the Nation Department. It is not the Country Department. It is the State Department. Trying to argue that the word `state` is unambiguous and, therefore, the subsidies should not be paid out to those outside of states that setup exchanges was stupid and doomed to failure.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Offline
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
 Originally Posted By: Pariah


It is not the role of the SCOTUS to infer their own meanings into law.



Tee-hee. That's precisely what courts do.


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5