Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
OP Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29


Never a disappointment listening to Alex Jones, and this June 22nd segment is no exception.

Normally I agree with and buy into a lot of what Alex Jones says, initially. Then, at some point he just goes way too far off the deep end, that just makes you pull back and say C'mon, man, no way...

But when you have an Obama administration that was doing surveillance on Trump campaign officials, on into the early months of Trump's actual presidency, when you have "Deep State" leaks all over the place, visible to any observer being a clear attempt by federal bureaucrats of the previous administration to undermine Trump, well... anything becomes possible.

There is a globalist conspiracy beyond Obama/Hillary/Democrat loyalty that wants to topple the United States. That wants to cripple the dollar, undermine our patriotism, our history and our national identity, to make us reject nationalism and embrace a global takeover, or at least not resist a power grab by globalists. I reject certain elements of Jones' stance, but still feel for all his bluster that he's pointing in the right direction. Certainly more so than the "destroy Trump" Newspeak liberal media.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
OP Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29


The larger point is that Hannity (like Alex Jones) is on air exposing an attempted coup to depose President Trump to undo the 2016 election. And that Hannity is opposing his producers by exposing it, at risk of his job. And this is the reason that it was revealed by insiders that surveillance was being done on the Trump campaign and Trump administration. That much I certainly believe.

Jones further says that the surveillance was exposed by individuals who wanted to prevent an actual military coup against the president.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,792
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,792
Likes: 40
You are aware that he's had his lawyer even argue that Jones is just playing a character? This is just the wrestling model applied to politics.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
OP Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
You said pretty much the same stuff about Glenn Beck. And really, seem to push similar talking points about ANY conservative pundit.

I view my occasional sampling of Alex Jones with more skepticism than most pundits. But again, the fact that his statements are far more plausible based on the recent "deep state" leaks, questionably legal/ethical surveillance of Trump officials, and surveillance unmasking of Michael Flynn and others by sources in CIA/NSA/FBI, is telling about how much LESS credible and questionable many are in these federal agencies and the Obama administration.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,792
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,792
Likes: 40
Well It's the guy he pays to defend him that said that. He lost that custody case btw.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
OP Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

The incredible corruption of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama's administration, and the unquestionably Democrat-subservient media are beyond dispute. In the last few days alone, CNN has been forced to fire three reporters and pull a fraudulent story from their website:

 Quote:

Coverage of 2016 US Presidential Election

On April 3, 2016, hundreds of supporters of Bernie Sanders protested outside of CNN Los Angeles. Sanders supporters were protesting CNN's coverage of the 2016 United States presidential elections, specifically in regards to the lack of airtime Sanders has received. Known as Occupy CNN, protesters claimed that major media networks have intentionally blacked out Sanders' presidential campaign in favor of giving much more airtime to candidates such as Hillary Clinton.[19]


Donna Brazile and Roland Martin

In October 2016, WikiLeaks published emails from John Podesta which showed CNN contributor Donna Brazile passing the questions for a CNN-sponsored debate to the Clinton campaign.[20] In the email, Brazile discussed her concern of Clinton's ability to field a question regarding the death penalty. The following day Clinton would receive the question about the death penalty, verbatim from an audience member at the CNN-hosted Town Hall event.[21] According to a CNNMoney investigation, the debate moderator Roland Martin of TV One "did not deny sharing information with Brazile."[22] CNN severed ties with Brazile on October 14, 2016.[23][24]


Wikileaks emails

CNN reporter Chris Cuomo said on a live coverage of the 2016 elections that downloading the Podesta emails from the Wikileaks website was illegal, and that only the media could legally do so. The statement drew criticism to the network for being false.[25][26][27]


Conflict with Trump administration

On December 2, 2016, CNN made headlines on The Drudge Report when video obtained by FTVLive captured off camera audio of a CNN producer making a joke about Trump's plane crashing. The joke was made to CNN correspondent Suzanne Malveaux while she was being prepped to go live at the Trump Carrier press conference in Indiana.[28][29] A spokesperson for CNN responded by saying "An unfortunate and inappropriate remark was made by one of our producers off camera yesterday. We have apologized to the Trump transition team, and the producer has been disciplined."[30]

On January 10, 2017 CNN reported on the existence of classified documents that said Russia had compromising personal and financial information about then President-elect Donald Trump. CNN did not publish the dossier, or any specific details of the dossier, as they could not be verified. Later that day, BuzzFeed published the entire 35-page dossier with a disclaimer that it was unverified and "includes some clear errors".[31][32][33] The dossier had been read widely by political and media figures in Washington, and had been sent to multiple other journalists who had declined to publish it as it was unsubstantiated.[31] At a press conference the following day, Trump referred to CNN as fake news and refused to take a question from CNN reporter Jim Acosta.[34]

On February 24, 2017, CNN and other media organizations such as The New York Times were blocked from a White House press briefing. The network responded in a statement: "Apparently this is how they retaliate when you report facts they don't like. We'll keep reporting regardless."[35]


Retraction of Scaramucci story

On June 26, 2017, three network investigative journalists; Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Haris, resigned from CNN over a retracted story that connected Anthony Scaramucci to a $10 billion Russian investment fund. The network apologized to Scaramucci and stated that the online story did not meet their editorial standards.[36]

The network also imposed new rules on Russia related stories being published to social, video, editorial, or MoneyStream without going through the chain of command within CNN.[37]


Deceptive reporting through leaking debate questions, selective omission of the facts, biased coverage, and blatant lies.


On the Obama administration side, illegal surveillance to gain political advantage, that Hillary Clinton's presumed victory would hide from the public later. But Trump's victory threw a wrench in their plans, and all this corruption is now on public display.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
OP Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,971
Likes: 29

And here are the Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson programs from last night, from the only network not to selectively omit the facts, the only one willing to detail the corruption of the mainstream media, of how the media is flying cover for the Obama and Hillary Clinton teams.
Simultaneously protecting them and slandering Trump.

Even when the facts are RIGHT THERE for them to report, they absolutely refuse to, and continue to smear Trump.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5