Did you even read my post? I ask since I suggested that the couple should have went to another baker.
Here's what you posted.
The baker may want to read up on the sin of gluttony and think about a new career if he's worried about passively endorsing a same-sex wedding.
While I think the baker is probably picking and choosing amongst biblical sins, he does have the federally protected right to do so. The gay couple should have just found another bakery instead of letting this probably ruin their wedding.
I split your comment in two, because the two halves of what you posted don't seem to project the same message.
The first half sounds rather intolerant of the baker's beliefs, stating basically that if he doesn't share the beliefs of gays he should find another profession.
The second half does, as you say, allow for the baker's right to serve who he wants. But you do project two conflicting ideas of tolerance/intolerance for his beliefs.
