I already did eight posts ago: "Marriage is necessitated by social/moral objectives."

In which case: "You're saying that mutual affection establishes precedent for marriage, but marriage has never required a prerequisite of affection. And, for that matter, marriage has never been a requirement for people who share affection. The synthesis between Marriage and affection is an expressly cultural development.

If your interpretation for the precedent of marriage's practice is dependent upon a purely cultural aspect of the institution, then what does that tell you about you--and homosexuals in general--assigning so much importance to the ritual?"