M E M, the point is that even the Obama-adoring media at this point is forced to report the truth, or lose all credibility as news organizations. The media are capable of good coverage and information, on stories they are not as emotionally invested in. But on the subject of Obama, they clearly have a bias. And for them to have that bias, and STILL report the above cited facts, is testament to how undeniable the truth is. Except to a DNC talking-points Obama-bot like yourself.
I think this last bit is the capstone on just how serious Obama was in his State of the Union address, Obama's interview by Youtube video blogger Glozell Green:
As in: Not at all.
Pure cynical politics. Obama's SOTU address fronted laughable untruths and a diversionary agenda (free education, etc.) that he has no intention of pursuing, beyond demagoguing Republicans. If he truly valued and wanted to fight for these things, why didn't he ram them through when he had overwhelming Democrat House and Senate majorities?
Because 1) they aren't a real priority, just partisan rhetoric, and 2) because even the previous Democrat majorities would not have passed them. Just like Democrat non-support of his "Cap and Trade" bill. Just like Democrat non-support of his second Stimulus bill( deceitfully re-named a "Jobs Bill") Just like Democrat ambivalence on passing Obamacare, which was actually a win by cheating, passed by "reconciliation" with less than 60 Senate votes, and by purchasing the votes of Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) paid off with billions in tax-paid perks for their states, by the tax dollars of the 53% majority nationwide who vocally opposed Obamacare's passing. And it also barely passed the House.
