I'm saying WB's post erroneously declares illegality. I know you don't care for her but it was legal for her to have a server.
The question has never been was it legal for someone to own a server, nor to, per se, operate one. The question is/was whether or not she used the server to violate the law.
Given the actual question presented, are you saying you believe she should enjoy the presumption of innocence or are you declaring, without all the facts, that she committed no wrong?
