Respectfully, T-Dave, you don't know Hillary's past.
She is an Alinsky-trained cultural Marxist. She is a radical pursuing a leftist agenda, to the detriment and further destruction of the nation.
The best possible scenario is that she's still a leftist, but for whom money, greed and power are now more important. In which she is a political chameleon who will say and do anything to get elected and get access to money and power. The Clintons used the IRS to audit and harass their political enemies. (As has Obama, though with plausible deniability that they orchestrated it.) There's no limit to what these leftist end-justifies-the-means fanatics would do in office. We've gotten some sample of it in both the Bill Clinton and the Obama years.
Some other recent examples:
1) Loretta Lynch/James Comey, a backroom deal that made the charges go away.
2) The rigging of the DNC nomination process, leveraging out Bernie Sanders, even though they would have eventually leveraged out Bernie if they'd just done it by the rules.
3) The strong-arm tactics and suppression of Bernie Sanders dissenters during the DNC convention, taking away their signs, forcing many to leave. Surrogates chanting "Hillary! HILLARY! HILLARY!" to drown out and hide chants of dissent.
5) The Hillary Newspeak media, that largely hid the obvious dissent that was going on at their own convention! Only if you were watching Fox News was it covered that there was widespread dissent and protest.
That's just a sampling of the corruption, lies, and iron-fisted crackdown on dissenting speech that would accompany a Hillary Clinton/DNC victory.
I only half-jokingly call her Frau Hitlery. The Clintons have definitely made manifest their capacity for abuse of power and targeting their political opposition, using the branches of government. As has Obama.
That may all be true but Daves point is also true. She might have done all that but "indicted" is a legal term with a specific meaning, namely, "formally charged with a crime by a grand jury."
That being said, based on what we know if it were anyone but her and the highly politicized Obama Justice Department involved, she would be indicted by now, on that server issue if nothing else
I don't think there's ever been or will be another case where the FBI director, or any law enforcement official ever came forward and said The subject of our investigation is demonstrably guilty of all charges, but for unclear reasons we're not going to prosecute despite an abundance of incriminating evidence. James Comey might as well have concluded, I've been paid off.
There is all the citing of evidence of an indictment, and a choice not to do so that makes absolutely no sense. General David Petraeus and at least one State Department official while Hillary Clinton was State Secretary were convicted on far less.
It's on the level of calling the Fort Hood shooting "office violence". It is OBVIOUSLY something different than what the official statement says.
