Well, it all seems to be a moot point now doesn't it?
Unless Clinton is found to have on video personally handed bombs to ISIS (and, for the avoidance of doubt, if there is anything very serious backed by clear evidence and not mere and arguable allegations, which comes out in the next fortnight then she deserves to lose), Trump's road to the White House is now, statistically, highly improbable.
Trump will institute legal challenges because his psychological make up is that he can't handle losing (a poor character trait). If he loses by a clear majority - and this seems very likely with Arizona and even Texas and Utah swinging to the Democrats and Florida on a knife edge - then those challenges will be a very steep uphill battle. The litigation might go on for years, depending upon whether they are expedited to the Supreme Court. Oh well.
The reports of militia which seems to be arming itself in apprehension of a Clinton presidency is intriguing but the laughable bit about the right to bear arms is that the US military has incomparably better arms, tactics and training. I guess there might be some shoot-outs and deaths involving those who think its time to overthrow tyranny. Curiously, despite the rise of extremist "Patriot" groups since Obama was elected, I can't find any evidence online of the government putting them down.
