Curiously, despite the rise of extremist "Patriot" groups since Obama was elected, I can't find any evidence online of the government putting them down.
Because those reports are wildly exaggerated.
Quote:
Unless Clinton is found to have on video personally handed bombs to ISIS (and, for the avoidance of doubt, if there is anything very serious backed by clear evidence and not mere and arguable allegations, which comes out in the next fortnight then she deserves to lose), Trump's road to the White House is now, statistically, highly improbable.
You seem to be imposing a higher standard for Clinton (i.e., a criminal standard or at least a preponderance of the evidence one) for 'proving' allegations against a candidate than against Trump (his 'confession' to Billy Bush is evidence but, standing on it down insufficient to convict). But perhaps I am misunderstanding your point
