Originally Posted By: the G-man

The Supreme Court has consistently held that except for the supermajority votes required by the Constitution (treaties, veto override, constitutional amendments), all other votes require only a simple majority.

The Constitution does not specify a supermajority for presidential nominations.

The current Senate rule, which effectively requires a supermajority for nominations is, therefore, on its face, unconstitutional.



 Originally Posted By: the G-man

I've never been in favor of filibustering judicial nominees. As such, I don't oppose what Reid did today....


Please stop assuming everyone is as a big a hypocrite as you.