The women accusers mostly ARE Democrats, and very partisan in their opinion about Trump being president and wanting to stop him.
The media likewise are an auxiliary of the DNC, absolutely no separation between them, and eager to carry the DNC talking points and stop Trump by any means, and in numerous cases have said that's their holy mission, to stop Trump.
All the stated people above (Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, Bruce Ohr >>AND<<< his Fusion GPS-employed wife, Andrew McCabe >>>AND<<< his Terry MacAuliff/Clinton campaign-funded wife, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, on and on).
ALL have made clear in their direct e-mail/texted words or by advancing corrupt investigation that was clearly faked, their commitment to prevent Trump from becoming president, and (backup plan) to destroy his integrity by illicit fake evidence and cripple his presidency.
Comey leaked federal information to a college professor buddy, in his own congressional hearing videotaped words, for the expressed purpose of paving the way for a special investigation, based on fake evidence.
Rosenstein in a written report to Trump called for Comey to be fired as the only way to restore FBI internal morale, and to restore public trust in the FBI's integrity. THEN ROSENSTEIN CALLED FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION, to investigate Trump's firing of Comey, THAT ROSENSTEIN HIMSELF RECOMMENDED! Why is there even an investigation?
The FISA requests to do surveillance on Trump officials was based on a DNC/Hillary-commissioned "dossier" by Chris Steele, and Rosenstein AGAIN was the hand that authorized the FISA requests, knowing that the evidence was fake. And bamboozled a judge into signing off on the FISA surveillance, with pseudo-corroboration of "verifying source" that also came from Steele (Yahoo News).
My disappointment with the Devin Nunes memo release is despite that it codifies what has been known for weeks, it offers no new evidence beyond what has been revealed over the last 2 weeks. But even if it was a silver bullet that proved everything, Democrats and the DNC Newspeak media would still pretend it didn't exist. They pretend what was already known doesn't exist and portray it as insignificant.
My complaint isn't that the evidence of Democrat/FBI/DOJ/Russian collusion doesn't exist, it's that the latest "memo" added to the stack of evidence was simply overhyped to a be smoking gun that it wasn't. At least not as dramatic a smoking gun as was promised in the hype.
