That lawyer Trump tried to get to lie for him for example. (besides Cohen).
That again is another fishing eexpedition by the House Democrats.
And McGahn allegedly being instructed to obstruct is again another misrepresentation. In the worst light, the president voiced the desire to fire Mueller, but ultimately based on the advice of his lawyers, did not.
So what is Trump guilty of, a thoughtcrime?
There is no actual crime, Trump ultimately just explored his legal options.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/20/white-house-blocks-don-mcgahn-testimony/Again, FOUR investigations have found a lack of evidence, and concluded no collusion or obstruction. If the exhaustive $35 million Mueller probe didn't find anything, it is highly unlikely any other investigation will.
Rep. Nadler's new House investigation (and Maxine Waters, and I forget the others) are all engaged in a baseless and vindictive fishing expedition for Trump's IRS, business and bank records.
AGAIN: where there is no evidence of a crime, Democrats are in a desperate attempt, based on nothing, to manufacture a crime for Trump to be guilty of.
To smear him, to diminish him, to prevent his re-election by whatever malicious abuse of powers available.
I am far from the only one voicing this perspective. Among those who have voiced similar views of this Democrat over-reach, legal scholar (and liberal) Alan Dershowitz, liberal Geraldo Rivera, constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, and former DOJ official and lawyer Mark Levin.
