Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
WSJ: Sondland testified that it was a quid pro quo

I've noticed that some conservatives are making the argument that Trump needs to stop trying to argue that it wasn't a quid pro quo because it obviously was and the House has the evidence. The argument should be that it's not an impeachable offense. Such a gross corrupt use of power though still leaves Trump getting impeached.


You so desperately want it to be true. Kurt Volker's testimony, and texts, already disproved this before it was even alleged.

The Next Revolution, Steve Hilton Sunday, 10-27-2019


This is just pure vindictive Democrat politics, with a few never-Trumpers from the establishment Right piling on. But wishful thinking by Dems won't make it true. Hilton's commentary 20 minutes in rips apart the argument you'd like to believe.