“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.
Our legal process either finds someone "guilty" or "not guilty".
That is a verdict of insufficient evidence, and therefore "not guilty".
You would like to twist the legal system and have Trump proven not innocent, and guilty until proven innocent.
“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
Again, that is a "not guilty" verdict.
You like Trump are pushing a false narrative of Mueller 's investigation WB. And Trump is at this very moment having his Justice Department investigate that investigation. This is the same JD that found nothing of value when the IG went to them with the whistleblower complaint and tried to keep it hidden.
No, I'm absolutely not pushing a false narrative. Theree previous federal investigations, and then a $30 million-dollar Mueller special investigation loaded with 17 partisan Democrats who hated Trump's guts and did everything they could to destroy him, ultimately came to the conclusion that Trump was
not guilty.
Period. The end. Despite some weaselly language in the Mueller report that left the door open for House Democrats to open still more pointless investigations. But if it couldn't be found with the unlimited legal resources of a Mueller special investigation, there is no evidence to be found. This is all partisan Democrat theatre, to try and smear Trump in the court of public opinion, in the absence of real evidence.
Deception, slander, intimdation, threats and mob violence. The Democrat way. Whatever serves your Bolshevik revolution.
