Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
Sondland's testimony as well as others is evidence even if you don't want to admit it. And any obstruction article would certainly be worthy. Do you really think Trump is blocking records and testimony that he thinks would actually clear him? How would that even make sense?



Gordon Sondland had no proof!

Sondland basically said that is my opinion.
To which the Republican House member questioning him said: ""And that is nothing."

The next closest thing to actual evidence was David Holmes saying he overheard a portion of a cel-phone call of Sondland, a call that that was not on speaker-phone, where he could allegedly hear a portion of what Trump shouted over the phone. Which Trump made fun of, saying he has tried many times to overhear other's cel phone calls, and this was impossible. Even if Holmes had heard anything, it was at best only pieces of the total conversation. And I believe he is a partisan/deepstate Demcorat, just trying to damage Trump.
As is Fiona Hill.
As is Gregory Kent.
As is William Taylor.
As is, most obviously, Marie Yovanovich. Who actually held a Hillary Clinton victory party on election night 2016, in addition to pressing the Ukranian government with a list of Democrat-friendly compaanies they were instructed not to investigate for corruption. In addition to her being overheard by both Ukranian and State Department/embassy officials making pre- and post-election disparaging remarks about Trump.

Only opinions and speculation, and fourth-hand gossip were presented at the impeachment hearings, no actual "evidence". And then Republicans were not allowed to call their own witnesses, present exculpatory evidence, and often were shut down by Schiff when they tried to ask cross-examination questions!

Mark Levin last night on his Life Liberty Levin program cited that the U.S. Constitution was based on the British Magna Carta, and that Schiff broke not only Donald Trump's Constitutional rights, but every one of the Magna Carta rights that existed prior to the U.S. Constitution for 500 years!

Trunp does not have the right to face his accuser, the right to even know who his accuser is (the whistleblower/rat, Eric Ciaramella), does not have the basic right to call witnesses in his defense, does not have the right to cross examine witnesses presented by his opposition, does not have the right to present exculatory evidence proving his innocence... everything is controlled by Adam Schiff and the other Democrats, and when House Republicans like Nunes, Jordan, Stefanik, Ratcliffe, Turner, Wenstrup and others asked questions that exposed the truth, Schiff raised his voice and shut them down.

But even through all these layers of Democrat hijacking of the process and deception, the American public ses through it, and that is already showing up in the polls, in Trump's favor.