Here's an informative article on Lou Dobbs and available testing for Coronavirus.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ng-fewer-peopl/

Despite that I learned a lot, and it explores a lot that has nothing to do with Lou Dobbs, it annoys me that they label it as "mostly true" but never cite or even imply anything that Dobbs allegedly got wrong.
I watched Dobbs' interview with HHS Secretary Alex Azar, and I frankly thought Dobbs was a bit hard on the guy, end even a bit of a jerk to him, but he did make the point that the secretary was giving assurances of safety, without hard testing data to back up those assurances. Sometimes one has to rattle the person they're interviewing to get an honest answer, and that's what Dobbs did.



Here's a list of all the current Politifact articles related to Coronavirus:
https://www.politifact.com/coronavirus/

A lot of them are about anonymous comments on Facebook. Who would take a random opinion comment as "fact" worthy of factchecking?