The problem here is you define “evil” as both any viewpoint that conflicts in any substantive way and any activity, even if wholly legal, that might oppose your goals as such. And when you define something as “evil” you then adopt a draconian “ends justify the means” approach against anyone engaged in your definition of same.
Case in point: I’ve never advocated for violent insurrection or any attempt to overturn a legally cast vote. All I’ve done is argue there was nothing illegitimate about using constitutional means to challenge potentially illegal activity. For that, you advocate I should be forced into silence.
That attempt at quelling debate is, would submit , the true evil
