quote:
Originally posted by Dave:
quote:
Originally posted by Dave the Wonder Boy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dave:

I read "tradition and policy" as "homophobia".
I read "homophobia" as daring to voice an intelligent opinion that bucks the opinion of the gay/liberal community, and being falsely labelled a "hater" of some kind, to undermine dismissively the logic and intelligence of those views.
No. You can challenge the opinions of the gay/liberal community as much as you like, and you can do it in a valid, fair, intelligent and even compassionate way.

But when you deny someone the right to do the same thing you can do, simply because they like having sex with someone of their same gender, then you are a homophobe.
Name-calling isn't usually your style, Dave.

I don't like being slapped with labels that undermine the logic of what I've said. I've quoted Biblical verses at length to show that the Bible and homosexuality are absolutely not compatible.
Gays have rights, up to the point that they choose to stomp on someone else's religion and lifestyle.
As I've said.
Repeatedly.

And after making my point logically, four posters ignoring the logic of what I've said come right back, ignoring the above, and call me a homophobe, or equivalent nonsense.

I already said, REPEATEDLY, as many here have ignored and forced me to repeat, that I support gays' right to have some kind of life-partner gay union equivalent of marriage, so long as they don't drape it in Christianity, and doing so attempt to pervert the meaning of Christianity and the Bible ITSELF.

Gays in a democratic society have a right to their lifestyle.
Christians in a democratic society have a right to their lifestyle.

But the concept of gay marriage interferes with that balance, and urinates on the basic teachings of Christianity. (and yes, yes, I know other religions and cultures have marriage traditions as well, and I already covered that as well, in detail, for those who will bother to read the last two topic pages.)

I don't expect insults and sweeping generalizations from you, Dave.

Although they're par for the course for OMEGA MAN (a.k.a. The SENSITIVE Gourmet, a.k.a. Wilder Midnight, a.k.a. Star-butted sneetch, a.k.a. Matt Kennedy.) His comments are, as usual, completely unworthy of response.

Matter Eater Man, and Danny, raise issues slightly less offensively, but still regurgitate the same sweeping statements about conservatives and Christians ( even as they bash Christians and conservatives with closed-minded "hate" stereotypes, for allegedly using the same type of sweeping generalizations they accuse Christians/conservatives of making about gays. The difference is, it has already been proven in this topic that gay ideology attempts to re-write and corrupt the Bible, and how this relates directly to the absurd concept of gay marriage, especially gay marriage dressed in a Christian mask)

I've answered those accusations in detail already, and disproven them.
As has Captain Sammitch in his posts.

I mean geez, why don't you guys actually read what we've said before making these kind of statements?