It's difficult to make sense of everything we hear. I've seen just about as much that disagrees with those previous findings. Scientists are human beings too, and therefore there's an angle, however subtle, to what they observe and report. The trouble is that everything so far is descriptive evidence, various circumstances that have been observed. That's okay in and of itself, but when it's used as evidence of underlying factors without any conclusive supporting information that pertains directly to those underlying factors, you're still going out on a limb to say your side has THE ANSWER(tm).

go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ