you might be right, but thats why we live in a democracy, its what the majority chooses. if the majority chooses to make a marriage a union between man and woman then that is the law. its not right for a court to arbitrarily(sp?) decide it doesnt like it so it wont happen. if the majority decided divorces werent allowed id have to live with that as well. do you also find it ironic that the same people who argued the alabamba jusdge should follow the law and not his beliefs arent making the same case about these judges?