Quote:

KrazyXXXDJ said:
Quote:

Pariah said:
Well, before I answer that question. I would like to hear from you first, how it is not. Please, I'd REALLY like to know exactly how it is JUST AS chancy as non-promiscuous straight sex.



? I'm not sure I understand the question there.


Your statement was that homosexuality and promiscuity can be viewed equally as dangerous, if i interpreted it right.
I just don't get how an monogamous (homosexual) relationship is just as dangerous as a promiscuous (heterosexual) one.

Non-promiscuous homosexual sex is the same as non-promiscuous heterosexual sex in risk factors, just as anything else that is non-promiscuous - homo or hetero doesn't matter in this case - it's the promiscuity that makes them both equally dangerous - right?



Nonononononono.

The physical differences between the sphincter and the vagina is the biggest factor here. One's WAY more fragile and accident prone than the other. Note that this reasoning is also based on the scenario of having no condoms and the usual uninformed (in the ways and dangers of homosexual intercourse) couples going at it. Another topper is the everpresent fact that anal sex damages no matter how careful you are. Despite what you're definition of damage may be, the fact is that it leaves a lasting unhealthy.....Groove (and worse) so to speak.