Quote:

Animalman said:
"Yes, it's true, it does require two components to create life.. However, there are so many heterosexual couples who are incapable of procreation for medical reasons."

Is it really that hard to see? I used one example to show that the argument was flawed.

By all means, though, continue avoiding the argument.



Animalman's technique:

A) Make broad statement.

B ) Pathetically argue it's validity.

C) After someone of his own political stance points out its stupidity, make a 180 and agree with said poster.

D) When feeling threatened after someone actually argues his points, he'll take apart his entire post and analyze it piece by piece so as to over-explain it and then destroy its original contextualization.

E) Spontateously agree with other posters who don't agree with whom he's arguing with.

F) Use volley upon volley of ad hominem when he realizes that no one's buying it.

G) Repeat.