Quote:

Wednesday said:
That's what I wondered when you made your argument.

But to answer your question, nope, it isn't. It's a serious question since each vote COSTS the government money and allowing everyone to vote is economically inefficient.



This is a brilliant statement. It is economically ineffecient, temporally inefficient, and mechanically ineffecient. It is far more efficient to have fewer and fewer people voting. In fact, a totally centralized, singular power yields a greater (the greatest?) governmental efficiency (if "working from maximum efficiency" is your goal).

Thus, government, the more it works for the people, of the people, and by the people, is by DESIGN less than maximally efficient. In fact, efficiency is NOT the goal of a Republic form of government.

It's all about equal protection under the law, folks.

We all wear a green carnation.