Quote:

Jim Jackson said:
This logic has already been shot down by r3x.

Gay people work and raise children.



Gay people working was never the issue. The fact that they have no chance of having kids without preparing for them adequately beforehand means your argument is full of shit. And what's more, the ones that aren't adequately repaired get help by the government anyway.

Quote:

And many str8 marrieds do not raise children.



Stop trying to create averages that aren't there. "Many" straights who don't raise children aren't the majority of straights who do. And also, those "many" straights still mainly hone the ability to have potential families. Which is one of the larger reasons for benefits among straights.

Quote:

Now, by your logic, those str8s who are married but have no children should be compelled to divorce or have their marriages legally annulled because they do not meet one of your criteria for being married.



No. As I said before, you're creating averages that aren't there. This is system is based on majority. Maximum efficiency. In the case of straights, such a marriage is a finagle. Not illegal.

Quote:

Further, those str8s who are married but struggle with their "consumerists abilities" should be compelled to divorce or have their marriages legally annulled because they do not meet one of your criteria for being married.



The criteria consists of ability to have kids.