So this kid was covered under the current plan? Is this the very same plan that Bush isn't eliminating, cutting funding to, or in any way altering for the worse? Isn't this the same plan that he's wanting to prevent from being spread to families with higher incomes and accessibility to health care? I'm not going to bash this kid or his family, but I also don't see how trotting him out is proof that what Bush has done is evil. If that kid were to get sick today and not a year or so ago or whenever he was originally ill, he'd still be covered by the same plan.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."