Pretty Little Distractions: Alexis Ren

more photos

where's the nude pics.

Probably a Maxim layout is as close to nude as she'll get.

She's beautiful enough I'm not complaining.

I just noticed I accidentally wrote "igorgeous" instead of gorgeous.

My apologies to anyone who clicked here hoping to see a beautiful hunchbacked bikini model!

And here I was thinking Apple had invented its own version of gorgeousness.

Oh well, apples, melons, either or.

I'd love to get my hands on some imellons...

is all good

Indeed. Great body.

That open-legs shot where she's posing with two other girls is just hypnotic.

Alexis Ren
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mV9BSOkeNmA&list=UUSoKaD27LRI9nBPJ2KB1lnQ&index=13

Very pretty but a little jailbaitish

I looked her up.
Born November 23, 1996.

So she'll be 19 in a few months. I actually thought she was older. But still, she's over 18.

But your initial post was in July 2013. Meaning she was only 17.

Granted, in a lot of places 17 is legal. But in other places she would definitely have been jailbait.

And that assumes that some of the pictures from the initial post weren't taken even earlier.

*sigh*

Can't we just enjoy photos of an attractive girl, who chooses to earn her living as a high-profile attractive girl?


I mean, it's not like everyone here hasn't enjoyed the looks of teenage girls, even if we'd never qualify ourselves for a statutory rape charge by indulging those desires.
I mean really, even when she was under 18, was there ever seriously any chance that I (or anyone here or elsewhere enjoying her photos) would have illegal sex with her as a minor, just by enjoying her photos?

She, no doubt with the consent of professionals and her parents, markets herself as a sexy bikini model. I don't see the harm in enjoying what she probably earns a fortune to give us photos of.

That kind of talk leads to charges of book researching', if you know what I mean.

But, seriously, I'm not trying to argue with you or accuse you of bad intent. It isn't like she's nude or doing porn. I'm just pointing out that my concern about her looking underaged was borne out. She was underaged.

Okay, point taken.
And yeah, she was under 18 when I initially posted her photos.

Before checking, I 'd have guessed her to be somewhere around 20-23.
It's a good thing I was looking and not touching.