Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 13 of 24 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 23 24
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
But you're now trying to cast this solely in terms of the behavior of the executives and ignore the flawed policies of the White House that allowed the behavior in the first place.

The fact they didn't do take the loophole is irrelevant to whether or not it was a mistake to create the loophole in the first place which is the point I was addressing from the beginning.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
its a hypocrisy issue. the white house talks tough bashing executives and leading the uneducated into believing they are capping excessive paychecks on the public's dime. then in secret backroom deals they create loopholes so that these guys get huge paydays on the backs of our tax dollars.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
But you're now trying to cast this solely in terms of the behavior of the executives and ignore the flawed policies of the White House that allowed the behavior in the first place.

The fact they didn't do take the loophole is irrelevant to whether or not it was a mistake to create the loophole in the first place which is the point I was addressing from the beginning.


I didn't expect Bush to make everything loophole free, did you?


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
 Quote:
I didn't expect Bush to make everything loophole free, did you?


I wasn't in favor of the bailout when Bush proposed it either. In fact, you will note that I've been casting this largely as a "White House" decision during our recent discussion precisely because two presidents have now dropped the ball on this issue.

So how is your question regarding what I did or did not expect Bush to have done relevant?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
 Quote:
I didn't expect Bush to make everything loophole free, did you?


I wasn't in favor of the bailout when Bush proposed it either. In fact, you will note that I've been casting this largely as a "White House" decision during our recent discussion precisely because two presidents have now dropped the ball on this issue.

So how is your question regarding what I did or did not expect Bush to have done relevant?


You seemed to be holding the government responsible for loopholes. I didn't ask if you were in favor of the bailout when Bush proposed it. I asked it you expected Bush to make everything loophole free? (and you didn't answer the question)


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
In other words, you're trying to make this solely Bush's fault(TM) when it's the fault of both Bush and Obama.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Once again I answer questions while you dodge them. If you can participate in a discussion at some point let me know.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
I said Bush was fucking this up months ago. I said the same about Obama. You want to assign partisan blame while I want to discuss the folly of the plan itself. I think the record very clearly reflects who is trying to change the subject here and avoid actual dialogue.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
...

I didn't expect Bush to make everything loophole free, did you?


Fair play!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Bush never tried to pretend to be against CEO's making millions from the bailouts, Obama does in speeches, then provides loopholes to allow them if the company wants to use them.

Bush and Obama do share blame for this but it doesn't exonerate Obama just because Bush screwed up first.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
Bush never tried to pretend to be against CEO's making millions from the bailouts, Obama does in speeches, then provides loopholes to allow them if the company wants to use them.


If they hadn't created the caps the ceos would have just been able to get the money, what am I suppose to be upset about again?

 Quote:
Bush and Obama do share blame for this but it doesn't exonerate Obama just because Bush screwed up first.


While I think they're efforts haven't been perfect in this crisis I still think it's better than letting everything just fall apart and imagining that everything will be all better when the dust settles.


Fair play!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
Bush never tried to pretend to be against CEO's making millions from the bailouts, Obama does in speeches, then provides loopholes to allow them if the company wants to use them.


If they hadn't created the caps the ceos would have just been able to get the money, what am I suppose to be upset about again?



Obama didn't really create caps is the point. If you put rules in place to cap taxpayer money being spent on large salaries and bonuses, then include on purpose workarounds it isn't a real cap. You really don't understand that or are you just playing around?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
Bush never tried to pretend to be against CEO's making millions from the bailouts, Obama does in speeches, then provides loopholes to allow them if the company wants to use them.


If they hadn't created the caps the ceos would have just been able to get the money, what am I suppose to be upset about again?



Obama didn't really create caps is the point. If you put rules in place to cap taxpayer money being spent on large salaries and bonuses, then include on purpose workarounds it isn't a real cap. You really don't understand that or are you just playing around?


Yeah we know you hate Obama and the caps are not perfect but it's better than not having them. Case in point what is currently being discussed. If the caps were not there the CEOS probably would have just gotten the money by now. Instead it looks like they can't use their loophole. Again what am I suppose to be upset about in this case?


Fair play!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
They don't exist, its not a cap if there is a loophole.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
They don't exist, its not a cap if there is a loophole.


It must be frustrating for you reading any news where they call them caps

So for those that didn't recieve the usual pile of cash because of the nonexistent caps, what do you think caused that? Magic?


Fair play!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
are you high again?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
I'm high again.


Fair play!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
http://www.gantdaily.com/news/11/ARTICLE/52041/2009-05-19.html

 Quote:
Washington, D.C. (AHN) - The Senate votes Tuesday on a bill adding consumer protections in the credit card industry. The American Bankers Association and some Republicans have warned that the new rules may worsen the credit crisis.

Lawmakers convene at 10:00 am to resume consideration of "any pending germane amendments," according to the schedule released by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). The final vote will be held before the weekly party luncheons.

Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT), the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee had announced last week that he had reached an agreement with Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) on provisions of the bill.

The measure requires that payments from cardholders be applied first to the balance with the highest interest rate. It prohibits credit card companies from increasing rates in the first year after the account is opened. Card issuers thereafter are required to give a 45-day notice before increasing rates.

Companies must also mail statements at least 21 days before the bill is due, and must not charge interest on paid-off balances from the previous billing cycle, also known as double-cycle billing.

The House approved its own version of the measure about three weeks ago by a 357-70 vote. All except one of the 70 votes against the bill had come from Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, a group of House conservatives.

House Republicans had said that the bill would only make it more difficult for middle class Americans to use a credit card and ultimately exacerbate the credit crunch plaguing the economy.

The American Bankers Association has also warned that the "new rules may increase the cost of credit and make it less available for consumers and small businesses."

The group had also written Dodd and Shelby saying, "Lenders of all sizes have already taken extensive efforts to comply with these sweeping reforms, and if confronted by new requirements, will have even more difficulty serving their customers at a time their customers most need it."

President Barack Obama is seeking to raise consumer confidence and get credit flowing amid a deepening recession and rising unemployment rate, which went from 8.5 percent in March to 8.9 percent in April, the highest since September 1983.

Consumer credit also fell by 5.2 percent or $11.1 billion in March, the biggest drop since 1990, according to the Federal Reserve. Revolving credit in the first quarter declined by 6.5 percent.

The Fed had issued new credit card regulations last December, but those rules will take effect in July 2010.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
This is why I find bailouts mind numbing. The President and Congress tell us that the banks need an infusion of money because their balances are low, then they propose taking revenue from the banks. WTF?

I like these credit card reforms that isn't an issue with me. But since the President has decided banks need x amount of public money, if you take $50 billion from their balance sheets wont they need another $50 billion in public money to make up for the loss from this? They are chasing their tail.

Same with the auto industry. They keep saddling them with higher $ regulations and wondering why nobody is buying.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,203
Likes: 80
I like the credit card reforms too. It's reasonable and fair.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,958
Likes: 6
Yeah, based on the article, me too.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
rex Offline
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
Its the government putting more restrictions on private business. That's how this whole mess started. Its good to see that retardation on both sides still exists.


November 6th, 2012: Americas new Independence Day.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
A beam of sunshine must have broken through the armor of old quilts hung over the basement windows and brightened up the room enough for rex to realize how miserable and pathetic his life truly is.


whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
rex Offline
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
I don't need a beam of sunlight to realize that.


November 6th, 2012: Americas new Independence Day.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
Yet, it is still an unwelcome foe.


whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
I like the credit card reforms too. It's reasonable and fair.


But how do you feel about us having to replace the lost revenue for the banks with tax money? Now that we have determined the banks need to be at a certain capital level every dollar below is being funded by the tax payer. Isn't it time to stop bailing out the banks that cant achieve this level? Or do you believe we should pump money into them to replace this?

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: rex
Its the government putting more restrictions on private business. That's how this whole mess started. Its good to see that retardation on both sides still exists.


I don't see this as restrictions as much as eliminating deceptive practices.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
rex Offline
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
If you don't like the way they do business don't get credit cards through them. If enough people stop using them they will change their ways. The free market would change things, not the government. I thought people like you and thedoctor would agree with me on something like this.


November 6th, 2012: Americas new Independence Day.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Likes: 1
I'm never against making a business forthcoming and honest. The government shouldn't be mandating every aspect of a business, but it should have the power to make sure that the business is being open and fair. It's no different from when the government told the banks that they can't advertise a checking account as 'free checking' unless it actually was free checking and didn't have a shitload of hidden fees.


whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: rex
If you don't like the way they do business don't get credit cards through them. If enough people stop using them they will change their ways. The free market would change things, not the government. I thought people like you and thedoctor would agree with me on something like this.


I would if it was the case in the credit card industry but it's not. Historically all credit card companies operate this way. There is nothing wrong with making rates and fees more transparent.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
rex Offline
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
Even if its the government forcing them to?


November 6th, 2012: Americas new Independence Day.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
im against excessive regulation, but the constitution does provide for regulating interstate commerce. as long as it is in moderation i dont have a problem with it.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Punishing false advertising makes sense. I certainly agree with that. But from what I can tell, the government actually wants to control the credit card rates. That's ludicrous.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
There is nothing in there to regulate rates, they just have to be clear and up front. They cant lend you money at a certain rate, then up the rate after you borrowed it. That is a bait and switch.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Okay. What if they say up front that they reserve the right to raise rates after the card is purchased? Would that in and of itself be considered not up front?

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Um that's what this bill is doing.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
Then that's my problem with it. If they say that you're signing up with a card that's rates are subject to change then it's not false advertising. They were given forewarning that the company could do something it has the prerogative to do.

I'm sure it makes life harder and makes signing up with credit card companies more dangerous, but the government has no right to fuck with it.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
They have a constitutional right to fuck with it, what rights are you talking about?

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
It's a policy within a private industry!

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
It's a nation of laws imposed on private businesses and citizens, where have you been? Did you fall asleep watching the Road Warrior?

Page 13 of 24 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 23 24

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0