Apparently it isn't just a monkey
Apparently there's nothing to show that it isn't a monkey because it has no characteristics that make it
not a monkey. Otherwise, they wouldn't have been calling it a "monkey." The point here is that they're hopeful about being able to call it something else when they're finished looking at it.
What? It
is a primate, just in a very early stage. It's still in the process of evolving from other mammals.
Uh, yeah. No.
You probably graduated from high school around the early 90s because that's when evolutionary scientists were still clinging to the idea that since apes have a 97% similarity in DNA strain, that meant that we were related through primates when, in reality, they had no idea what it meant.
In which case, they later found out that apes had too many base letter discrepancies to truly be related to us. So they had to scrap the popular idea.
Oh dear. What do you think then? And please tell me you're not a creationist or something.
